Preferences for Risks and Benefits of Treatment Outcomes for Chronic Low Back Pain: Choice-Based Conjoint Measure Development and Discrete Choice Experiment.


Journal

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1934-1563
Titre abrégé: PM R
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101491319

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Dec 2023
Historique:
revised: 10 10 2023
received: 10 05 2023
accepted: 16 11 2023
medline: 2 12 2023
pubmed: 2 12 2023
entrez: 1 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Understanding patient preferences for chronic low back pain (cLBP) outcomes is essential for targeting available therapeutic options. We developed and tested a choice-based conjoint (CBC) measure to elicit what outcomes cLBP patients want to achieve and avoid. We developed a survey based CBC measure to allow patients to make risk/benefit trade-off choices between possible treatment outcomes. After extensive literature, clinician, and patient input, our measure included seven attributes: fatigue, anxiety/depression, difficulty thinking/making decisions, pain intensity, physical abilities, change in pain, and ability to enjoy life despite pain. Each subject responded to 14 pairs of the same 7 attributes consisting of randomly selected levels within each attribute. Random-parameters logit models were used to estimate strength of preferences and latent class analysis was used to identify patient characteristics associated with distinct preference. Online study using the Sawtooth™ web-based platform. 211 individuals with cLBP recruited from online advertising and academic and private clinical sites. Not applicable. The most valued outcome was the highest level of physical activity (β=1.6-1.98;p<0.001), followed by avoiding cognitive difficulties (β=-1.48;p<0.001). Avoidance of severe pain was comparable to avoiding constant fatigue and near-constant depression/anxiety (β=-0.99,-1.02);p<0001). There was an association between preferences and current pain/disability status; patients with higher pain had a stronger preference to avoid severe pain, whereas those with higher disability stronger preferences for achieving physical activity. The latent class analysis identified two distinct groups: (1) more risk-seeking and willing to accept worse outcomes (56%); and (2) more risk-averse with a stronger preference for achieving maximum benefits (44%). Our study illuminated the heterogenous cLBP patient preferences for treatment outcomes. Patients stressed the importance of reaching high physical activity and avoiding cognitive declines, even over a desire to avoid pain. More work is needed to understand patient preferences. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38040670
doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13112
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Leslie Wilson (L)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

Alina Denham (A)

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Yelena Ionova (Y)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

Conor O'Neill (C)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

Carol M Greco (CM)

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Afton L Hassett (AL)

Associate Professor Anesthesiology., University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI.

Janel Hanmer (J)

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Sana Shaikh (S)

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Wolf M (W)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

Sigurd Bervin (S)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

David Williams (D)

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Yanlei Ma (Y)

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Jeffrey Lotz (J)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

Patricia Zheng (P)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.

Classifications MeSH