Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Burkina Faso: a modelling study.


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 14 06 2023
accepted: 06 11 2023
medline: 4 12 2023
pubmed: 2 12 2023
entrez: 1 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Africa has some of the highest cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates globally. Burkina Faso launched a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme for 9-year-old girls in 2022 with support from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (Gavi). An economic evaluation of HPV vaccination is required to help sustain investment and inform decisions about optimal HPV vaccine choices. We used a proportionate outcomes static cohort model to evaluate the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination for 9-year-old girls over a ten-year period (2022-2031) in Burkina Faso. The primary outcome measure was the cost (2022 US$) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted from a limited societal perspective (including all vaccine costs borne by the government and Gavi, radiation therapy costs borne by the government, and all other direct medical costs borne by patients and their families). We evaluated four vaccines (CERVARIX®, CECOLIN®, GARDASIL-4®, GARDASIL-9®), comparing each to no vaccination (and no change in existing cervical cancer screening and treatment strategies) and to each other. We combined local estimates of HPV type distribution, healthcare costs, vaccine coverage and costs with GLOBOCAN 2020 disease burden data and clinical trial efficacy data. We ran deterministic and probabilistic uncertainty analyses. HPV vaccination could prevent 37-72% of cervical cancer cases and deaths. CECOLIN® had the most favourable cost-effectiveness (cost per DALY averted < 0.27 times the national gross domestic product [GDP] per capita). When cross-protection was included, CECOLIN® remained the most cost-effective (cost per DALY averted < 0.20 times the national GDP per capita), but CERVARIX® provided greater health benefits (66% vs. 48% reduction in cervical cancer cases and deaths) with similar cost-effectiveness (cost per DALY averted < 0.28 times the national GDP per capita, with CECOLIN® as the comparator). We estimated the annual cost of the vaccination programme at US$ 2.9, 4.1, 4.4 and 19.8 million for CECOLIN®, GARDASIL-4®, CERVARIX® and GARDASIL-9®, respectively. A single dose strategy reduced costs and improved cost-effectiveness by more than half. HPV vaccination is cost-effective in Burkina Faso from a limited societal perspective. A single dose strategy and/or alternative Gavi-supported HPV vaccines could further improve cost-effectiveness.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Africa has some of the highest cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates globally. Burkina Faso launched a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme for 9-year-old girls in 2022 with support from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (Gavi). An economic evaluation of HPV vaccination is required to help sustain investment and inform decisions about optimal HPV vaccine choices.
METHODS METHODS
We used a proportionate outcomes static cohort model to evaluate the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination for 9-year-old girls over a ten-year period (2022-2031) in Burkina Faso. The primary outcome measure was the cost (2022 US$) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted from a limited societal perspective (including all vaccine costs borne by the government and Gavi, radiation therapy costs borne by the government, and all other direct medical costs borne by patients and their families). We evaluated four vaccines (CERVARIX®, CECOLIN®, GARDASIL-4®, GARDASIL-9®), comparing each to no vaccination (and no change in existing cervical cancer screening and treatment strategies) and to each other. We combined local estimates of HPV type distribution, healthcare costs, vaccine coverage and costs with GLOBOCAN 2020 disease burden data and clinical trial efficacy data. We ran deterministic and probabilistic uncertainty analyses.
RESULTS RESULTS
HPV vaccination could prevent 37-72% of cervical cancer cases and deaths. CECOLIN® had the most favourable cost-effectiveness (cost per DALY averted < 0.27 times the national gross domestic product [GDP] per capita). When cross-protection was included, CECOLIN® remained the most cost-effective (cost per DALY averted < 0.20 times the national GDP per capita), but CERVARIX® provided greater health benefits (66% vs. 48% reduction in cervical cancer cases and deaths) with similar cost-effectiveness (cost per DALY averted < 0.28 times the national GDP per capita, with CECOLIN® as the comparator). We estimated the annual cost of the vaccination programme at US$ 2.9, 4.1, 4.4 and 19.8 million for CECOLIN®, GARDASIL-4®, CERVARIX® and GARDASIL-9®, respectively. A single dose strategy reduced costs and improved cost-effectiveness by more than half.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
HPV vaccination is cost-effective in Burkina Faso from a limited societal perspective. A single dose strategy and/or alternative Gavi-supported HPV vaccines could further improve cost-effectiveness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38041075
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10283-3
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-10283-3
pmc: PMC10693094
doi:

Substances chimiques

Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18 0
Papillomavirus Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1338

Subventions

Organisme : PATH, United States
ID : KFW.0888-38-01710369-SUB
Organisme : PATH, United States
ID : KFW.0888-38-01710369-SUB
Organisme : PATH, United States
ID : KFW.0888-38-01710369-SUB
Organisme : PATH, United States
ID : KFW.0888-38-01710369-SUB
Organisme : PATH, United States
ID : KFW.0888-38-01710369-SUB
Organisme : PATH, United States
ID : KFW.0888-38-01710369-SUB

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Saudi Med J. 2022 May;43(5):538
pubmed: 35537734
Lancet. 2009 Jul 25;374(9686):301-14
pubmed: 19586656
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e712-23
pubmed: 26475018
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 10;356(19):1928-43
pubmed: 17494926
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 15;63(4):519-27
pubmed: 27230391
Vaccine. 2008 Jul 29;26(32):4080-93
pubmed: 18550229
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 20;16(12):e0260808
pubmed: 34928971
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jul;2(7):e406-14
pubmed: 25103394
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Apr;22(4):361-73
pubmed: 25651922
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):100-10
pubmed: 22075170
J Infect Dis. 2009 Apr 1;199(7):926-35
pubmed: 19236279
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 09;5:CD009069
pubmed: 29740819
Euro Surveill. 2010 Nov 25;15(47):
pubmed: 21144444
Lancet. 2007 Jun 2;369(9576):1861-1868
pubmed: 17544766
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Dec 1;94(12):925-930
pubmed: 27994285
NEJM Evid. 2022 Jun;1(5):EVIDoa2100056
pubmed: 35693874
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;10(11):
pubmed: 36423008
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009 Apr 10;84(15):118-31
pubmed: 19360985
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Feb 1;112(2):145-153
pubmed: 31086947
Int J Cancer. 2016 Jun 15;138(12):2867-74
pubmed: 26856527
Vaccine. 2022 Mar 31;40 Suppl 1:A85-A93
pubmed: 34303563
Int J Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;147(11):3037-3048
pubmed: 32449157
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593

Auteurs

Joël Arthur Kiendrébéogo (JA)

Department of Public Health, University Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. jkiendre@gmail.com.
Recherche pour la santé et le développement (RESADE), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. jkiendre@gmail.com.
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. jkiendre@gmail.com.

Annick Raissa O Sidibe (ARO)

Directorate of Prevention through Immunization, Ministry of Health, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Jhpiego, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Ghislain Bertrand Compaoré (GB)

Radiotherapy Center of Bogodogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Relwendé Nacanabo (R)

Institute of Health Sciences and Research (IRSS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Orokia Sory (O)

Recherche pour la santé et le développement (RESADE), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Issa Ouédraogo (I)

Directorate of Prevention through Immunization, Ministry of Health, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Saira Nawaz (S)

PATH, Seattle, USA.

Anne E Schuind (AE)

PATH, Seattle, USA.

Andrew Clark (A)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH