Factors influencing the difference in dissolved ion inputs to the forest floor between deciduous and coniferous stands: comparison under high and low atmospheric deposition conditions.

Atmospheric deposition Canopy budget model Canopy exchange Dry deposition Phenology

Journal

Environmental monitoring and assessment
ISSN: 1573-2959
Titre abrégé: Environ Monit Assess
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8508350

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 09 06 2023
accepted: 10 11 2023
medline: 4 12 2023
pubmed: 2 12 2023
entrez: 2 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

It is necessary to clear the relationship between physical and vegetation factors on the processes governing dissolved ion inputs to the forest floor to estimate correctly the values of atmospheric input to the forest. This study identified the factors influencing the differences in dissolved ion inputs to the forest floor between coniferous evergreen and broad-leaved deciduous species by analyzing the phenological variations of dry deposition and canopy exchange calculated by the canopy budget model under a high-deposition site near the city of Tokyo and a low-deposition site 84 km further away. At low-deposition site, vegetation factors such as capture efficiency did not explain the differences in Na

Identifiants

pubmed: 38041704
doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-12132-6
pii: 10.1007/s10661-023-12132-6
pmc: PMC10693530
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1

Subventions

Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 20K15563
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 24658133
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 22780139

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Oecologia. 1983 Sep;59(2-3):216-223
pubmed: 28310235
Environ Pollut. 2003;124(2):179-221
pubmed: 12713921
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2014 Dec 15;28(23):2539-49
pubmed: 25366401
Oecologia. 2015 Jan;177(1):5-15
pubmed: 25407620
Environ Pollut. 2003;124(3):379-88
pubmed: 12758019
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 May;187(5):270
pubmed: 25893759
Science. 2003 Dec 5;302(5651):1716-9
pubmed: 14657488
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Jul 15;365(1-3):154-66
pubmed: 16616318
Environ Pollut. 2017 Oct;229:607-620
pubmed: 28689149
Environ Pollut. 2004 Sep;131(1):93-105
pubmed: 15210279
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Jul 15;430:48-58
pubmed: 22621811
Oecologia. 2009 Feb;159(1):1-13
pubmed: 18975011
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Dec;21(12):4613-26
pubmed: 26146936
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 17;5(1):1596
pubmed: 27652169
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 10;842:156947
pubmed: 35753456
Oecologia. 2007 Sep;153(3):663-74
pubmed: 17629749
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Mar 15;420:168-82
pubmed: 22325986
Environ Pollut. 2008 Mar;152(1):1-10
pubmed: 17658672

Auteurs

Naohiro Imamura (N)

Hokkaido Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. nimamura@ffpri.affrc.go.jp.

Nobuhito Ohte (N)

Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan.

Nobuaki Tanaka (N)

Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo Hokkaido Forest, The University of Tokyo Forests, Furano, Hokkaido, Japan.

Articles similaires

Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Semiconductors Photosynthesis Polymers Carbon Dioxide Bacteria
Fragaria Light Plant Leaves Osmosis Stress, Physiological
India Carbon Sequestration Environmental Monitoring Carbon Biomass

Classifications MeSH