Prospective comparison between a peristaltic pump and vacuum containers for paracentesis: Time, resources and safety.

Ascites Paracentesis Peristaltic pump Vacuum Wall suction

Journal

Clinical imaging
ISSN: 1873-4499
Titre abrégé: Clin Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8911831

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 06 08 2023
revised: 01 11 2023
accepted: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 3 12 2023
medline: 3 12 2023
entrez: 2 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To meet the increasing demand for radiology departments to perform paracenteses, this study was done to compare the operational, financial and clinical impact of draining ascites with a peristaltic pump versus conventional vacuum containers. Prospective cohort study of 157 paracenteses (56 subjects) drained with ACCEL® evacuated drainage bottles (B. Braun Interventional Systems, Bethlehem, PA) and 159 paracenteses (53 subjects) drained with the RenovaRP® pump (Laborie Medical Technologies Corp., Portsmouth, NH). A short elective questionnaire was then distributed to the procedure staff and the subjects drained by both methods. Mean volume drained with the pump (5 L) was comparable to that drained by vacuum containers (4.9 L, p = 0.77). Mean time to drain subjects with the pump (18.6 min) was 9.1 min shorter and 3.8 min less variable than subjects drained with vacuum containers (27.7 min). This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01) and clinically important (effect size = 0.73). Flow rate with the pump (4 min/L) was significantly faster (p < 0.05) than vacuum containers flow rate (6.6 min/L). No adverse events occurred in either group. Use of the pump increased the average cost by 21% and reduced earnings by 3%. All assistants (n = 6) and patients (n = 10) that responded to the questionnaire recommended the use of the pump over vacuum containers. The peristaltic pump safely drains ascites significantly faster and with less variability in time than vacuum containers. While use of the pump slightly increases cost per paracentesis, it was recommended by all paired subjects undergoing a paracentesis and all personnel assisting in the procedure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38042055
pii: S0899-7071(23)00253-X
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.110033
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110033

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Auteurs

Paul Bennett Lewis (PB)

Interventional Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America. Electronic address: paul@lewismd.com.

Classifications MeSH