Effects of nursery production methods on fungal community diversity within soil and roots of Abies alba Mill.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Dec 2023
02 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
19
05
2023
accepted:
21
11
2023
medline:
4
12
2023
pubmed:
3
12
2023
entrez:
2
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to elucidate how different nursery production methods influence the composition of and relationship between soil and root community levels of Abies alba. In the Międzylesie Forest District, we quantified the responses of samples of both community-level fine roots and surrounding soil to environmental changes evoked by various seedling production methods. Fungi levels were identified based on their ITS 1 region and 5.8 S rDNA component. Analysis was conducted using Illumina SBS technology, and the obtained sequences were compared with reference samples deposited in the UNITE. Chemical analysis of the soil was also performed. Different nursery production methods resulted in a strong decoupling in the responses of fungal community levels between soil and roots. Changes in growth conditions imposed by production methods were significant in determining species composition. We found differences in fungal communities among functional groups of samples. In the soil, the dominant species of mycorrhizal fungi were Tylospora asterophora, Amanita rubescens, and Russula ionochlora. Mycorrhizal fungi in roots included Tuber anniae, Thelephoraceae sp., and Acephala applanata. Specific soil substrate conditions significantly influenced fungal community composition, leading to an increase in abundance of mycorrhizal fungi, specifically T. anniae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38042872
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48047-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-48047-y
pmc: PMC10693611
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21284Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42865
pubmed: 22900058
Front Microbiol. 2018 Apr 13;9:707
pubmed: 29755421
Mycorrhiza. 2009 Feb;19(2):99-111
pubmed: 18941804
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D259-D264
pubmed: 30371820
Curr Genet. 1990 Oct;18(3):277-80
pubmed: 2249259
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):16219-24
pubmed: 25349387
New Phytol. 2007;174(2):430-440
pubmed: 17388905
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D633-42
pubmed: 24288368
Plants (Basel). 2022 May 05;11(9):
pubmed: 35567249
Mycorrhiza. 2018 Aug;28(5-6):509-521
pubmed: 29948411
Mycorrhiza. 2016 Jan;26(1):57-65
pubmed: 26071873
Stud Mycol. 2018 Oct 11;92:195-225
pubmed: 31998413
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 29;10(1):7198
pubmed: 32350351
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 03;7:10516
pubmed: 26839246
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 19;8(7):e69048
pubmed: 23894406
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 1;6(27):
pubmed: 32937432
Mycorrhiza. 2015 Oct;25(7):517-31
pubmed: 25694036
Mycorrhiza. 2005 Dec;16(1):33-41
pubmed: 16177926
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 05;10:214
pubmed: 30891052
J Exp Bot. 2021 Jul 28;72(15):5766-5776
pubmed: 34114621
Methods Ecol Evol. 2015 Aug;6(8):973-980
pubmed: 27570615
ISME J. 2017 Apr;11(4):863-874
pubmed: 28085155
Fungal Biol. 2018 May;122(5):345-352
pubmed: 29665960