Temporal integration of sound motion: Motion-onset response and perception.
Delayed motion
Direction identification
Integration time
Minimal audible movement angle
Motion onset response
Journal
Hearing research
ISSN: 1878-5891
Titre abrégé: Hear Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7900445
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Nov 2023
29 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
10
01
2023
revised:
14
11
2023
accepted:
20
11
2023
medline:
4
12
2023
pubmed:
4
12
2023
entrez:
3
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The purpose of our study was to estimate the time interval required for integrating the acoustical changes related to sound motion using both psychophysical and EEG measures. Healthy listeners performed direction identification tasks under dichotic conditions in the delayed-motion paradigm. Minimal audible movement angle (MAMA) has been measured over the range of velocities from 60 to 360 deg/s. We also measured minimal duration of motion, at which the listeners could identify its direction. EEG was recorded in the same group of subjects during passive listening. Motion onset responses (MOR) were analyzed. MAMA increased linearly with motion velocity. Minimum audible angle (MAA) calculated from this linear function was about 2 deg. For higher velocities of the delayed motion, we found 2- to 3-fold better spatial resolution than the one previously reported for motion starting at the sound onset. The time required for optimal discrimination of motion direction was about 34 ms. The main finding of our study was that both direction identification time obtained in the behavioral task and cN1 latency behaved like hyperbolic functions of the sound's velocity. Direction identification time decreased asymptotically to 8 ms, which was considered minimal integration time for the instantaneous shift detection. Peak latency of cN1 also decreased with increasing velocity and asymptotically approached 137 ms. This limit corresponded to the latency of response to the instantaneous sound shift and was 37 ms later than the latency of the sound-onset response. The direction discrimination time (34 ms) was of the same magnitude as the additional time required for motion processing to be reflected in the MOR potential. Thus, MOR latency can be viewed as a neurophysiological index of temporal integration. Based on the findings obtained, we may assume that no measurable MOR would be evoked by slowly moving stimuli as they would reach their MAMAs in a time longer than the optimal integration time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38043403
pii: S0378-5955(23)00234-4
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108922
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108922Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.