Clinical Decision Support System in laboratory medicine.
clinical decision support
clinical decision support system
clinical laboratory
laboratory medicine
laboratory test
Journal
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
ISSN: 1437-4331
Titre abrégé: Clin Chem Lab Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9806306
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Dec 2023
05 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
01
11
2023
accepted:
24
11
2023
medline:
4
12
2023
pubmed:
4
12
2023
entrez:
4
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) have been implemented in almost all healthcare settings. Laboratory medicine (LM), is one of the most important structured health data stores, but efforts are still needed to clarify the use and scope of these tools, especially in the laboratory setting. The aim is to clarify CDSS concept in LM, in the last decade. There is no consensus on the definition of CDSS in LM. A theoretical definition of CDSS in LM should capture the aim of driving significant improvements in LM mission, prevention, diagnosis, monitoring, and disease treatment. We identified the types, workflow and data sources of CDSS. The main applications of CDSS in LM were diagnostic support and clinical management, patient safety, workflow improvements, and cost containment. Laboratory professionals, with their expertise in quality improvement and quality assurance, have a chance to be leaders in CDSS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38044692
pii: cclm-2023-1239
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-1239
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Références
Berner, ES. Clinical decision support systems: theory and practice [Internet] , 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer; 1999:61–74 pp. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4757-3903-9_3 [cited 30 May 2023].
Cresswell, K, Callaghan, M, Khan, S, Sheikh, Z, Mozaffar, H, Sheikh, A. Investigating the use of data-driven artificial intelligence in computerised decision support systems for health and social care: a systematic review. Health Inf J 2020;26:2138–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219900452 .
doi: 10.1177/1460458219900452
Salinas, M, López-Garrigós, M, Flores, E, Martín, E, Leiva-Salinas, C. The clinical laboratory: a decision maker hub. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1634–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0421 .
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0421
Salinas, M, López-Garrigós, M, Flores, E, Lugo, J, Leiva-Salinas, C, Massa-Dominguez, B, et al.. Laboratory computer-based interventions for better adherence to guidelines in the diagnosis and monitoring of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther 2019;10:995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0600-z .
doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0600-z
Radišić Biljak, V, Honović, L, Matica, J, Krešić, B, Šimić Vojak, S, joint working group of Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine and Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists for Laboratory Diagnostics in Chronic Kidney Disease . How well do Croatian laboratories adhere to national recommendations for laboratory diagnostics of chronic kidney disease (CKD)? Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:202–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0486 .
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0486
Salinas, M, Flores, E, Lopez-Garrigós, M, Salinas, CL. Artificial intelligence: a step forward in the clinical laboratory, a decision maker hub. Clin Biochem 2022;105–106:23–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.05.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.05.005
Huang, M, Han, H, Wang, H, Li, L, Zhang, Y, Bhatti, UA. A clinical decision support framework for heterogeneous data sources. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf 2018;22:1824–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2018.2846626 .
doi: 10.1109/jbhi.2018.2846626
Osheroff, J, Teich, JM, Levick, D, Saldana, L, Velasco, F, Sittig, DF, et al.. Improving outcomes with clinical decision support: an implementer’s guide [Internet] , 2nd ed. Chicago: CRC Press; 2012:323 p. https://www.routledge.com/Improving-Outcomes-with-Clinical-Decision-Support-An-Implementers-Guide/Osheroff-Teich-Levick-Saldana-Velasco-Sittig-Rogers-Jenders/p/book/9780984457731 [cited 26 Jun 2023].
Campbell, JR. The five rights of clinical decision support: CDS tools helpful for meeting meaningful use. J AHIMA 2013;84:42–7.
Flores, E, Salinas, JM, Blasco, Á, López-Garrigós, M, Torreblanca, R, Carbonell, R, et al.. Clinical decision support systems: a step forward in establishing the clinical laboratory as a decision maker hub. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023;22:27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2023.08.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.08.006
Plebani, M, Aita, A, Padoan, A, Sciacovelli, L. Decision support and patient safety. Clin Lab Med 2019;39:231–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2019.01.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2019.01.003
Hughes, AEO, Jackups, R. Clinical decision support for laboratory testing. Clin Chem 2022;68:402–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab201 .
doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab201
Peleg, M. Guidelines and workflow models. In: Clinical decision support . MA, USA: Academic Press; 2007:281–306 pp.
Wasylewicz, ATM, Scheepers-Hoeks, AMJW. Clinical Decision Support Systems. In: Kubben, P, Dumontier, M, Dekker, A, editors. Fundamentals of Clinical Data Science . Cham (CH): Springer Open; 2019:153–69 pp.
Sutton, RT, Pincock, D, Baumgart, DC, Sadowski, DC, Fedorak, RN, Kroeker, KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med 2020;3:17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y .
doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
Marco-Ruiz, L, Moner, D, Maldonado, JA, Kolstrup, N, Bellika, JG. Archetype-based data warehouse environment to enable the reuse of electronic health record data. Int J Med Inf 2015;84:702–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.016 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.016
Punchoo, R, Bhoora, S, Pillay, N. Applications of machine learning in the chemical pathology laboratory. J Clin Pathol 2021;74:435–42. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207393 .
doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207393
Kurstjens, S, van der Horst, A, Herpers, R, Geerits, MWL, Kluiters-De Hingh, YCM, Göttgens, EL, et al.. Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at the emergency department using routine testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1587–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0593 .
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0593
Worachartcheewan, A, Shoombuatong, W, Pidetcha, P, Nopnithipat, W, Prachayasittikul, V, Nantasenamat, C. Predicting metabolic syndrome using the random forest method. Sci World J 2015;2015:581501. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/581501 .
doi: 10.1155/2015/581501
Su, M, Guo, J, Chen, H, Huang, J. Developing a machine learning prediction algorithm for early differentiation of urosepsis from urinary tract infection. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;61:521–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1006 .
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1006
Canovas-Segura, B, Campos, M, Morales, A, Juarez, JM, Palacios, F. Clinical decision support using antimicrobial susceptibility test results. Adv Artif Intell, CAEPIA 2016;9868:251–60.
Wang, F, Mellett, J, Bauer, KA, Prier, B. Pharmacist-driven initiative for management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia using a clinical decision support system ; 2018. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85047734134&doi=10.2146%2Fajhp170087&partnerID=40&md5=2d4fa56c7e526b09f6cec18f6bbfb461 .
Rudolf, J, Baron, J, Dighe, A. Order indication solicitation to assess clinical laboratory test utilization: D-dimer order patterns as an illustrative case. J Pathol Inf 2019;10:36. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_46_19 .
doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_46_19
Comito, C, Forestiero, A, Papuzzo, G. A clinical decision support framework for automatic disease diagnoses. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM) . New York: ACM Digital Library; 2019:933–6 pp.
Saegerman, C, Gilbert, A, Donneau, AF, Gangolf, M, Diep, AN, Meex, C, et al.. Clinical decision support tool for diagnosis of COVID-19 in hospitals. PLoS One 2021;16:e0247773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247773 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247773
Demirci, F, Akan, P, Kume, T, Sisman, AR, Erbayraktar, Z, Sevinc, S. Artificial neural network approach in laboratory test reporting. Am J Clin Pathol 2016;146:227–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqw104 .
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw104
Baron, JM, Mermel, CH, Lewandrowski, KB, Dighe, AS. Detection of preanalytic laboratory testing errors using a statistically guided protocol. Am J Clin Pathol 2012;138:406–13. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpqirib3ct1ejv .
doi: 10.1309/ajcpqirib3ct1ejv
Bellodi, E, Vagnoni, E, Bonvento, B, Lamma, E. Economic and organizational impact of a clinical decision support system on laboratory test ordering ; 2017. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85038951721&doi=10.1186%2Fs12911-017-0574-6&partnerID=40&md5=f1cd860efb6e363a96dea3f60ed43f70 .
Piessens, V, Delvaux, N, Heytens, S, Aertgeerts, B, De Sutter, A. Downstream activities after laboratory testing in primary care: an exploratory outcome of the ELMO cluster randomised trial (Electronic laboratory medicine ordering with evidence-based order sets in primary care). BMJ Open 2022;12:e059261. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059261 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059261
Procop, GW, Keating, C, Stagno, P, Kottke-Marchant, K, Partin, M, Tuttle, R, et al.. Reducing duplicate testing a comparison of two clinical decision support tools. Am J Clin Pathol 2015;143:623–6. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpjoj3hkebd3tu .
doi: 10.1309/ajcpjoj3hkebd3tu
Procop, GW, Yerian, LM, Wyllie, R, Harrison, AM, Kottke-Marchant, K. Duplicate laboratory test reduction using a clinical decision support tool. Am J Clin Pathol 2014;141:718–23. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpowhoizbz3frw .
doi: 10.1309/ajcpowhoizbz3frw
Delvaux, N, Piessens, V, Burghgraeve, TD, Mamouris, P, Vaes, B, Stichele, RV, et al.. Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci 2020;15:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01059-y .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01059-y
Delvaux, N, De Sutter, A, de Velde, S, Ramaekers, D, Fieuws, S, Aertgeerts, B. Electronic laboratory medicine ordering with evidence-based order sets in primary care (ELMO study): protocol for a cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci 2017;12:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0685-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0685-6
Strockbine, VL, Gehrie, EA, Zhou, QP, Guzzetta, CE. Reducing unnecessary phlebotomy testing using a clinical decision support system. J Healthc Qual 2020;42:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1097/jhq.0000000000000245 .
doi: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000245
Baron, JM, Huang, R, McEvoy, D, Dighe, AS. Use of machine learning to predict clinical decision support compliance, reduce alert burden, and evaluate duplicate laboratory test ordering alerts. JAMIA Open 2021;4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab006 .
doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab006
Van de Velde, S, Heselmans, A, Delvaux, N, Brandt, L, Marco-Ruiz, L, Spitaels, D, et al.. A systematic review of trials evaluating success factors of interventions with computerised clinical decision support. Implement Sci 2018;13:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0790-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0790-1
Lundberg, GD. Adding outcome as the 10th step in the brain-to-brain laboratory test loop. Am J Clin Pathol 2014;141:767–9. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcp5ksxwti2dmcc .
doi: 10.1309/ajcp5ksxwti2dmcc
van Walraven, C, Naylor, CD. Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? JAMA 1998;280:550. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.6.550 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.280.6.550
Kalra, J. Medical errors: impact on clinical laboratories and other critical areas. Clin Biochem 2004;37:1052–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.08.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.08.009
Salinas, M. Laboratory medicine: from just testing to saving lives . Germany: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine; 2023.