Comparison of proximal row carpectomy with RCPI® versus proximal row carpectomy with Eaton's capsular interposition in the management of advanced wrist osteoarthritis.
RCPI
SLAC wrist
SNAC wrist
Wrist osteoarthritis
Journal
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
ISSN: 1877-0568
Titre abrégé: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101494830
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Dec 2023
02 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
20
03
2023
revised:
15
11
2023
accepted:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
5
12
2023
medline:
5
12
2023
entrez:
4
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is one of the recommended techniques for managing wrist osteoarthritis, it implies the integrity of the lunate fossa of the radius and the proximal pole of the capitate. If PRC is not possible, it is suggested to consider combining it with a capsule interposition (such as Eaton's flap) or opting for intra- or radiocarpal arthrodesis. Another alternative is to combine capitate resurfacing with a pyrocarbon implant (RCPi®). The aims of this study was to assessed the results between proximal PRC+Eaton and those associated PRC+RCPi® for advanced wrist osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that there would be no differences in clinical or functional outcome between proximal row carpectomy associated with RCPI® and those associated with Eaton capsular flap. It is a monocentric, retrospective, multi-operator study involving 83 wrists with osteoarthritis, included between January 2000 and December 2020 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Thirty-nine patients underwent PRC+Eaton and 44 patients underwent RCPI® resurfacing. Data such as pain, flexion, extension and strength as well as functional scores (PRWE, Mayo and quick DASH) were collected from the patient files at the last check-up. Results were comparable between the two groups in terms pain (VAS), mobility (flexion and extension), strength (GRASP) and functional scores (PRWE, Mayo and quick DASH). Carpal height was better preserved in the PRC+RCPI® group, with a Youm and McMurtry index evaluated at 0.3 in the PRC+Eaton group compared to 0.4 in the PRC+RCPI® group (p-value<0.001). Radiocarpal arthrodesis was required in 16% of the PRC+Eaton group and 6.8% of the PRC+RCPI® group, with a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.023). This study reports clinical and functional results that suggest RCPI® is an interesting alternative and can be associated with proximal row carpectomy in advanced wrist osteoarthritis. IV; retrospective study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38048904
pii: S1877-0568(23)00335-3
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103783
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103783Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.