Clinical phenotypes of cardiogenic shock survivors: insights into late host responses and long-term outcomes.

Biomarkers Cardiogenic shock Latent profile analysis Post intensive care syndrome (PICS) Post-ICU outcomes Precision medicine Predictive enrichment Prognostic enrichment

Journal

ESC heart failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Titre abrégé: ESC Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669191

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Dec 2023
Historique:
revised: 13 10 2023
received: 26 08 2023
accepted: 07 11 2023
medline: 5 12 2023
pubmed: 5 12 2023
entrez: 5 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

An elevated risk of adverse events persists for years in cardiogenic shock (CS) survivors with high mortality rate and physical/mental disability. This study aims to link clinical CS-survivor phenotypes with distinct late host-response patterns at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge and long-term outcomes using model-based clustering. In the original prospective, observational, international French and European Outcome Registry in Intensive Care Units (FROG-ICU) study, ICU patients with CS on admission were identified (N = 228). Among them, 173 were discharged alive from the ICU and included in the current study. Latent class analysis was applied to identify distinct CS-survivor phenotypes at ICU discharge using 15 readily available clinical and laboratory variables. The primary endpoint was 1 year of mortality after ICU discharge. Secondary endpoints were readmission and physical/mental disability [short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36) score] within 1 year after ICU discharge. Two distinct phenotypes at ICU discharge were identified (A and B). Patients in Phenotype B (38%) were more anaemic and had higher circulating levels of lactate, sustained kidney injury, and persistent elevation in plasma markers of inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, and endothelial dysfunction compared with Phenotype A. They had also a higher rate of non-ischaemic origin of CS and right ventricular dysfunction on admission. CS survivors in Phenotype B had higher 1 year of mortality compared with Phenotype A (P = 0.045, Kaplan-Meier analysis). When adjusted for traditional risk factors (i.e. age, severity of illness, and duration of ICU stay), Phenotype B was independently associated with 1 year of mortality [adjusted hazard ratio = 2.83 (95% confidence interval 1.21-6.60); P = 0.016]. There was a significantly lower physical quality of life in Phenotype B patients at 3 months (i.e. SF-36 physical component score). A phenotype with sustained inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, and endothelial dysfunction at ICU discharge was identified from readily available data and was independently associated with poor long-term outcomes in CS survivors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38050658
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14596
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Programme Hospitalier de la Recherche Clinique
ID : AON 10-216
Organisme : Société Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.

Références

Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, Charbonnier B, Schiele F, Lefèvre T, et al. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: A report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2535-2543. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs264
Lauridsen MD, Rørth R, Butt JH, Strange JE, Schmidt M, Kristensen SL, et al. Need for home care or nursing home admission after myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and/or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2022;9:707-715. doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac084
Kastrati A, Colleran R, Ndrepepa G. Cardiogenic shock: How long does the storm last? J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:748-750. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.004
Jentzer JC, Rayfield C, Soussi S, Berg DD, Kennedy JN, Sinha SS, et al. Advances in the staging and phenotyping of cardiogenic shock. JACC: Advances 2022;1:100120.
Jentzer JC, Rayfield C, Soussi S, Berg DD, Kennedy JN, Sinha SS, et al. Machine learning approaches for phenotyping in cardiogenic shock and critical illness. JACC: Advances 2022;1:100126.
Soussi S, Collins GS, Jüni P, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Le Manach Y. Evaluation of biomarkers in critical care and perioperative medicine: A clinician's overview of traditional statistical methods and machine learning algorithms. Anesthesiology 2021;134:15-25. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003600
Gayat E, Cariou A, Deye N, Vieillard-Baron A, Jaber S, Damoisel C, et al. Determinants of long-term outcome in ICU survivors: Results from the FROG-ICU study. Crit Care 2018;22:8. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1922-8
Mebazaa A, Casadio MC, Azoulay E, Guidet B, Jaber S, Levy B, et al. Post-ICU discharge and outcome: Rationale and methods of the The French and euRopean Outcome reGistry in Intensive Care Units (FROG-ICU) observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2015;15:143. doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0129-2
Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, Burkhoff D, Hall SA, Henry TD, et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019;94:29-37. doi:10.1002/ccd.28329
Herridge MS, Chu LM, Matte A, Tomlinson G, Chan L, Thomas C, et al. The RECOVER program: Disability risk groups and 1-year outcome after 7 or more days of mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194:831-844. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2304264
Zweck E, Thayer KL, Helgestad OKL, Kanwar M, Ayouty M, Garan AR, et al. Phenotyping cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e020085. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.020085
Soussi S, Sharma D, Jüni P, Lebovic G, Brochard L, Marshall JC, et al. Identifying clinical subtypes in sepsis-survivors with different one-year outcomes: A secondary latent class analysis of the FROG-ICU cohort. Crit Care 2022;26:114. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03972-8
Visser I, Speekenbrink M. Package ‘depmixS4’. Dependent mixture models-Hidden Markov models of GLMs and other distributions in S4. 2021. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/depmixS4/index.html. Accessed August 8, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2022.101609
Sarma D, Jentzer JC, Soussi S. Cardiogenic shock: A major challenge for the clinical trialist. Curr Opin Crit Care 2023;29:371-380. doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001066
Zweck E, Kanwar M, Li S, Sinha SS, Garan AR, Hernandez-Montfort J, et al. Clinical course of patients in cardiogenic shock stratified by phenotype. JACC Heart Fail 2023;S2213-1779:00239-00231. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2023.05.007
Jentzer JC, Soussi S, Lawler PR, Kennedy JN, Kashani KB. Validation of cardiogenic shock phenotypes in a mixed cardiac intensive care unit population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022;99:1006-1014. doi:10.1002/ccd.30103
Arrigo M, Price S, Baran DA, Pöss J, Aissaoui N, Bayes-Genis A, et al. Optimising clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A statement from the 2020 Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:1192-1202. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00172-7
Soussi S, Dos Santos C, Jentzer JC, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Pöss J, et al. Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: A narrative review. Intensive Care Med Exp 2023;11:50. doi:10.1186/s40635-023-00531-5
Ong S-B, Hernández-Reséndiz S, Crespo-Avilan GE, Mukhametshina RT, Kwek X-Y, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, et al. Inflammation following acute myocardial infarction: Multiple players, dynamic roles, and novel therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol Ther 2018;186:73-87. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.001
Mebazaa A, Soussi S. Precision medicine in cardiogenic shock: We are almost there! JACC Heart Fail 2023;S2213-1779:377-373. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.024

Auteurs

Sabri Soussi (S)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Room McL2-405, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada.
Inserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Mojtaba Ahmadiankalati (M)

Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Jacob C Jentzer (JC)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.

John C Marshall (JC)

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, St Michael's Hospital, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 36 Queen St E, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.

Patrick R Lawler (PR)

McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Margaret Herridge (M)

Department of Medicine, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Toronto General Research Institute, Institute of Medical Science, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Alexandre Mebazaa (A)

Inserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, Lariboisière - Saint-Louis Hospitals, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Etienne Gayat (E)

Inserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care, Lariboisière - Saint-Louis Hospitals, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Zihang Lu (Z)

Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Claudia C Dos Santos (CC)

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, St Michael's Hospital, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 36 Queen St E, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.

Classifications MeSH