The effect of clinical face shields on aerosolized particle exposure.

COVID-19 aerosol generating procedure aerosolized particles contamination face shield personal protective equipment (PPE)

Journal

Journal of 3D printing in medicine
ISSN: 2059-4763
Titre abrégé: J 3D Print Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101716116

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 14 07 2022
accepted: 16 11 2022
medline: 6 12 2023
pubmed: 6 12 2023
entrez: 5 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Face shields protect healthcare workers (HCWs) from fluid and large droplet contamination. Their effect on smaller aerosolized particles is unknown. An ultrasonic atomizer was used to simulate particle sizes equivalent to human breathing and forceful cough. Particles were measured at positions correlating to anesthetic personnel in relation to a patient inside an operating theatre environment. The effect of the application of face shields on HCW exposure was measured. Significant reductions in particle concentrations were measured after the application of vented and enclosed face shields. Face shields appear to reduce the concentration of aerosolized particles that HCWs are exposed to, thereby potentially conferring further protection against exposure to aerosolized particles in an operating theatre environment. Face shields protect health workers from splash contamination. We do not know if they protect against smaller invisible aerosol drops that can carry diseases like coronavirus 2019/COVID-19. The authors tested whether face shields can stop floating droplets using different types of face shields. This included one that was designed and made by a 3D printer, and traditional face shields. The shields were tested in a hospital operating room. A machine was designed that made invisible saltwater droplets. A monitor was used to measure the droplets present at a doctor's or nurse's mouth and then if this changed when a face shield was used. The face shield might be helpful in stopping health workers from catching diseases by stopping the flow of aerosol drops.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Face shields protect healthcare workers (HCWs) from fluid and large droplet contamination. Their effect on smaller aerosolized particles is unknown.
Materials & methods UNASSIGNED
An ultrasonic atomizer was used to simulate particle sizes equivalent to human breathing and forceful cough. Particles were measured at positions correlating to anesthetic personnel in relation to a patient inside an operating theatre environment. The effect of the application of face shields on HCW exposure was measured.
Results & Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Significant reductions in particle concentrations were measured after the application of vented and enclosed face shields. Face shields appear to reduce the concentration of aerosolized particles that HCWs are exposed to, thereby potentially conferring further protection against exposure to aerosolized particles in an operating theatre environment.
Face shields protect health workers from splash contamination. We do not know if they protect against smaller invisible aerosol drops that can carry diseases like coronavirus 2019/COVID-19. The authors tested whether face shields can stop floating droplets using different types of face shields. This included one that was designed and made by a 3D printer, and traditional face shields. The shields were tested in a hospital operating room. A machine was designed that made invisible saltwater droplets. A monitor was used to measure the droplets present at a doctor's or nurse's mouth and then if this changed when a face shield was used. The face shield might be helpful in stopping health workers from catching diseases by stopping the flow of aerosol drops.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Face shields protect health workers from splash contamination. We do not know if they protect against smaller invisible aerosol drops that can carry diseases like coronavirus 2019/COVID-19. The authors tested whether face shields can stop floating droplets using different types of face shields. This included one that was designed and made by a 3D printer, and traditional face shields. The shields were tested in a hospital operating room. A machine was designed that made invisible saltwater droplets. A monitor was used to measure the droplets present at a doctor's or nurse's mouth and then if this changed when a face shield was used. The face shield might be helpful in stopping health workers from catching diseases by stopping the flow of aerosol drops.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38051985
doi: 10.2217/3dp-2022-0016
pmc: PMC9870239
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

3DP2

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Références

Pediatr Res. 1997 Nov;42(5):721-7
pubmed: 9357949
J Infect Dis. 2022 May 4;225(9):1561-1568
pubmed: 32301491
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May - Jun;27(4):789-791
pubmed: 32247882
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):793-798
pubmed: 32221523
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;71(9):2311-2313
pubmed: 32628269
Anaesthesia. 2020 Nov;75(11):1437-1447
pubmed: 32516833
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):411-412
pubmed: 32105638
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Oct;64(2):100-14
pubmed: 16916564
Anaesthesia. 2021 Feb;76(2):182-188
pubmed: 33047327
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1837-1838
pubmed: 32215590
Br J Anaesth. 2020 May;124(5):497-501
pubmed: 32115186
Indoor Air. 2010 Feb;20(1):31-9
pubmed: 20028433
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 2;117(22):11875-11877
pubmed: 32404416
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13(4):235-42
pubmed: 26558413
Anaesthesia. 2020 Dec;75(12):1587-1595
pubmed: 32559315
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(8):509-18
pubmed: 24467190
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35797
pubmed: 22563403
Anaesthesia. 2020 Aug;75(8):1086-1095
pubmed: 32311771
Med J Aust. 2020 Sep;213(6):251-252.e1
pubmed: 32865245
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(7):443-9
pubmed: 22651099
Anaesthesia. 2021 Feb;76(2):174-181
pubmed: 33022093
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):914-924
pubmed: 32717211

Auteurs

Ian Chao (I)

Department of Anaesthesia, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Sarah Lee (S)

Department of Anaesthesia, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, 3128, Australia.

Jason Brenker (J)

Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, 3800, Australia.

Derrick Wong (D)

Department of Anaesthesia, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Caitlin Low (C)

Department of Anaesthesia, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Mathilde Desselle (M)

Herston Biofabrication Institute, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Herston, Queensland, 4029, Australia.

Anne Bernard (A)

QCIF Facility for Advanced Bioinformatics, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.

Tuncay Alan (T)

Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, 3800, Australia.

Zoe Keon-Cohen (Z)

Department of Anaesthesia, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Jasamine Coles-Black (J)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, 3085, Australia.

Classifications MeSH