Accurate image derived input function in [
Image derived input function
Mouse
Non-negative matrix factorization
[18F]SynVesT-1
Journal
EJNMMI physics
ISSN: 2197-7364
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101658952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Dec 2023
06 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
24
07
2023
accepted:
28
11
2023
medline:
6
12
2023
pubmed:
6
12
2023
entrez:
5
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Kinetic modeling in positron emission tomography (PET) requires measurement of the tracer plasma activity in the absence of a suitable reference region. To avoid invasive blood sampling, the use of an image derived input function has been proposed. However, an accurate delineation of the blood pool region in the PET image is necessary to obtain unbiased blood activity. Here, to perform brain kinetic modeling in [ In isoflurane anesthetized mice, the difference between ABS and NMF-IDIF activity (+ 12.8 [Formula: see text] 11%, p = 0.0023) was smaller than with IDIF (+ 16.4 [Formula: see text] 9.8%, p = 0.0008). For ketamine-xylazine anesthetized mice the reduction in difference was larger (NMF-IDIF: 16.9 [Formula: see text] 10%, p = 0.0057, IDIF: 56.3 [Formula: see text] 14%, p < 0.0001). Correlation coefficient between isoflurane AV-shunt time activity curves and NMF-IDIF (0.97 [Formula: see text] 0.01) was higher than with IDIF (0.94 [Formula: see text] 0.03). The brain regional 2TCM wsMAPE was improved using NMF-IDIF compared with IDIF, in isoflurane (NMF-IDIF: 1.24 [Formula: see text] 0.24%, IDIF: 1.56 [Formula: see text] 0.30%) and ketamine-xylazine (NMF-IDIF: 1.40 [Formula: see text] 0.24, IDIF: 2.62 [Formula: see text] 0.27) anesthetized mice. Finally, brain V Image derived left ventricle blood activity calculated with NMF improves absolute activity quantification, and reduces the error in the kinetic modeling fit. These improvements are more pronounced in ketamine-xylazine than in isoflurane anesthetized mice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Kinetic modeling in positron emission tomography (PET) requires measurement of the tracer plasma activity in the absence of a suitable reference region. To avoid invasive blood sampling, the use of an image derived input function has been proposed. However, an accurate delineation of the blood pool region in the PET image is necessary to obtain unbiased blood activity. Here, to perform brain kinetic modeling in [
RESULTS
RESULTS
In isoflurane anesthetized mice, the difference between ABS and NMF-IDIF activity (+ 12.8 [Formula: see text] 11%, p = 0.0023) was smaller than with IDIF (+ 16.4 [Formula: see text] 9.8%, p = 0.0008). For ketamine-xylazine anesthetized mice the reduction in difference was larger (NMF-IDIF: 16.9 [Formula: see text] 10%, p = 0.0057, IDIF: 56.3 [Formula: see text] 14%, p < 0.0001). Correlation coefficient between isoflurane AV-shunt time activity curves and NMF-IDIF (0.97 [Formula: see text] 0.01) was higher than with IDIF (0.94 [Formula: see text] 0.03). The brain regional 2TCM wsMAPE was improved using NMF-IDIF compared with IDIF, in isoflurane (NMF-IDIF: 1.24 [Formula: see text] 0.24%, IDIF: 1.56 [Formula: see text] 0.30%) and ketamine-xylazine (NMF-IDIF: 1.40 [Formula: see text] 0.24, IDIF: 2.62 [Formula: see text] 0.27) anesthetized mice. Finally, brain V
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Image derived left ventricle blood activity calculated with NMF improves absolute activity quantification, and reduces the error in the kinetic modeling fit. These improvements are more pronounced in ketamine-xylazine than in isoflurane anesthetized mice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38052966
doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00599-8
pii: 10.1186/s40658-023-00599-8
pmc: PMC10697927
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
78Subventions
Organisme : Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
ID : G0A8517N
Organisme : Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
ID : 1229721N
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Front Neurol. 2018 Jun 29;9:516
pubmed: 30013509
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2005 Oct;52(5):1311-1315
pubmed: 26478599
Mol Imaging Biol. 2020 Aug;22(4):854-863
pubmed: 31792838
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015 Jun 15;308(12):H1525-9
pubmed: 25862835
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022 Oct;42(10):1867-1878
pubmed: 35570828
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Jan;60(1):63-71
pubmed: 23060316
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023 Sep;43(9):1612-1624
pubmed: 37113068
J Nucl Med. 2015 Oct;56(10):1615-21
pubmed: 26272811
Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 25;16:796129
pubmed: 35401097
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Mar;36(3):463-71
pubmed: 19030855
MAGMA. 2004 Dec;17(3-6):157-61
pubmed: 15609036
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 Sep;27(9):1533-9
pubmed: 17519979
EJNMMI Res. 2011 Aug 10;1(1):13
pubmed: 22214227
Mathematics (Basel). 2021 Nov 2;9(22):
pubmed: 35694180
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Mar;53(3):601-6
pubmed: 15723407
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020 May 06;6(4):045001
pubmed: 33444262
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2003;14(3):534-43
pubmed: 18238037
J Nucl Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):330-6
pubmed: 16455640
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2023 Jun 15;2023:5366733
pubmed: 37362614
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Nov;60(11):3103-12
pubmed: 23797213