A quantitative analysis of human rights-related attitude changes towards people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities following completion of the WHO QualityRights e-training in Ghana.
Ghana
Human rights
People with disability
Training
World Health Organization
Journal
International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Dec 2023
05 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
06
11
2022
accepted:
27
10
2023
medline:
6
12
2023
pubmed:
6
12
2023
entrez:
5
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite growing recognition of essential human rights, people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities' rights are known to be frequently violated in mental healthcare worldwide, with common use of coercive practices and limited recognition of people's right to exercise their legal capacity and make decisions for themselves on treatment and other issues affecting them. To tackle this issue, Ghana adopted the WHO QualityRights Initiative in 2019. This aims to introduce a right-based, person-centred recovery approach within the mental health care system, protecting and promoting the rights of people with mental health conditions, psychosocial, cognitive, and intellectual disabilities in the healthcare context and community. E-training (capacity-building) was provided in Ghana across a broad array of stakeholder groups including healthcare professionals, carers, and people with lived experience. The training covered legal capacity, coercion, community inclusion, recovery approach, service environment, and the negative attitudes commonly held by stakeholder groups; it was completed by 17,000 people in Ghana as of December 2021. We assessed the impact of the e-training on attitudes through comparing trainees' pre- and post-questionnaire responses on 17 items, each measured on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree), such that higher scores indicated negative attitudes towards persons with mental health conditions and psychosocial disabilities as rights holders. Analyses were conducted on two main groups: matched pairs (417 pairs of baseline and follow-up questionnaire responses matched to a high degree of certainty), and the unmatched group (4299 individual completed questionnaire responses). We assessed the impact of the WHO QualityRights e-training on attitudes: training resulted in highly significant attitude changes towards alignment with human rights, with scores changing by approximately 40% between baseline and follow-up. In particular, attitude changes were seen in items representing treatment choice, legal capacity, and coercion. This change was not affected by age, gender, or background experience. The QualityRights e-training programme is effective in changing people's (especially healthcare professionals') attitudes towards people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities: this is a step towards mental healthcare being more with human rights-based worldwide.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite growing recognition of essential human rights, people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities' rights are known to be frequently violated in mental healthcare worldwide, with common use of coercive practices and limited recognition of people's right to exercise their legal capacity and make decisions for themselves on treatment and other issues affecting them. To tackle this issue, Ghana adopted the WHO QualityRights Initiative in 2019. This aims to introduce a right-based, person-centred recovery approach within the mental health care system, protecting and promoting the rights of people with mental health conditions, psychosocial, cognitive, and intellectual disabilities in the healthcare context and community.
METHODS
METHODS
E-training (capacity-building) was provided in Ghana across a broad array of stakeholder groups including healthcare professionals, carers, and people with lived experience. The training covered legal capacity, coercion, community inclusion, recovery approach, service environment, and the negative attitudes commonly held by stakeholder groups; it was completed by 17,000 people in Ghana as of December 2021. We assessed the impact of the e-training on attitudes through comparing trainees' pre- and post-questionnaire responses on 17 items, each measured on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree), such that higher scores indicated negative attitudes towards persons with mental health conditions and psychosocial disabilities as rights holders. Analyses were conducted on two main groups: matched pairs (417 pairs of baseline and follow-up questionnaire responses matched to a high degree of certainty), and the unmatched group (4299 individual completed questionnaire responses).
RESULTS
RESULTS
We assessed the impact of the WHO QualityRights e-training on attitudes: training resulted in highly significant attitude changes towards alignment with human rights, with scores changing by approximately 40% between baseline and follow-up. In particular, attitude changes were seen in items representing treatment choice, legal capacity, and coercion. This change was not affected by age, gender, or background experience.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The QualityRights e-training programme is effective in changing people's (especially healthcare professionals') attitudes towards people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities: this is a step towards mental healthcare being more with human rights-based worldwide.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38053116
doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00609-3
pii: 10.1186/s13033-023-00609-3
pmc: PMC10698997
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
46Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;25(6):486-91
pubmed: 22992549
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2008 Jan-Mar;17(1):10-3
pubmed: 18444451
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Jan 1;98(1):52-58
pubmed: 31902962
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;45(9):913-5
pubmed: 7989024
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):34-41
pubmed: 30600630
Health Law J. 2009;17:139-94
pubmed: 20608318
Schizophr Bull. 2009 May;35(3):646-54
pubmed: 18448478
Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;132(5):778-822
pubmed: 16910754
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):639
pubmed: 35366832
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jan 25;8(1):e31
pubmed: 35076357
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):43-44
pubmed: 30600615
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jun;18(1):263-276
pubmed: 27781015
Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1664-75
pubmed: 22008426
Br Med Bull. 2010;95:105-19
pubmed: 20501486
World Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;6(3):168-76
pubmed: 18188442
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):163-178
pubmed: 32669798
World Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;1(1):16-20
pubmed: 16946807
J Health Soc Policy. 1995;7(2):61-8
pubmed: 10154511
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Nov 11;16(1):28
pubmed: 27836014
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Feb;4(2):e89-e96
pubmed: 30446416
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;4(11):826-827
pubmed: 28711282
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014 May 04;8:16
pubmed: 24817908
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 30;:1-3
pubmed: 35049475
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):69-75
pubmed: 32669790
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;218(4):185-195
pubmed: 32847633
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(1):15-22
pubmed: 8146705