Expectations of clients, insurers, and providers: a qualitative responsiveness assessment among private health insurance sector in Kampala-Uganda.
Client
Expectations
Insurer
Private health insurance
Provider
Responsiveness
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Dec 2023
05 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
19
03
2023
accepted:
27
11
2023
medline:
7
12
2023
pubmed:
6
12
2023
entrez:
5
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is less attention to assessing how health services meet the expectations of private health insurance (PHI) actors, clients, insurers, and providers in developing countries. Interdependently, the expectations of each actor are stipulated during contract negotiations (duties, obligations, and privileges) in a PHI arrangement. Complementary service roles performed by each actor significantly contribute to achieving their expectations. This study assessed the role of PHI in meeting the expectations of clients, insurers, and providers in Kampala. Lessons from this study may inform possible reviews and improvements in Uganda's proposed National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to ensure NHIS service responsiveness. This study employed a qualitative case-study design. Eight (8) focus group discussions (FGDs) with insured clients and nine (9) key informant interviews (KIIs) with insurer and provider liaison officers between October 2020 and February 2021 were conducted. Participants were purposively selected from eligible institutions. Thematic analysis was employed, and findings were presented using themes with corresponding anonymized narratives and quotes. Client-Provider, Client-Insurer, and Provider-Insurer expectations were generally not met. Client-provider expectations: Although most facilities were clean with a conducive care environment, clients experienced low service care responsiveness characterized by long waiting times. Both clients and providers received inadequate feedback about services they received and delivered respectively, in addition to prompt care being received by a few clients. For client-insurer expectations, under unclear service packages, clients received low-quality medicines. Lastly, for provider-insurer expectations, delayed payments, selective periodic assessments, and inadequate orientation of clients on insurance plans were most reported. Weak coordination between the client-provider and insurer did not support delivery processes for responsive service. Health care service responsiveness was generally low. There is a need to commit resources to support the setting up of clearer service package orientation programs, and efficient monitoring and feedback platforms. Uganda's proposed National Health Insurance Act may use these findings to: Inform its design initiatives focusing on operating under realistic expectations, investment in quality improvement systems and coordination, and efficient and accountable client care relationships.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is less attention to assessing how health services meet the expectations of private health insurance (PHI) actors, clients, insurers, and providers in developing countries. Interdependently, the expectations of each actor are stipulated during contract negotiations (duties, obligations, and privileges) in a PHI arrangement. Complementary service roles performed by each actor significantly contribute to achieving their expectations. This study assessed the role of PHI in meeting the expectations of clients, insurers, and providers in Kampala. Lessons from this study may inform possible reviews and improvements in Uganda's proposed National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to ensure NHIS service responsiveness.
METHODS
METHODS
This study employed a qualitative case-study design. Eight (8) focus group discussions (FGDs) with insured clients and nine (9) key informant interviews (KIIs) with insurer and provider liaison officers between October 2020 and February 2021 were conducted. Participants were purposively selected from eligible institutions. Thematic analysis was employed, and findings were presented using themes with corresponding anonymized narratives and quotes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Client-Provider, Client-Insurer, and Provider-Insurer expectations were generally not met. Client-provider expectations: Although most facilities were clean with a conducive care environment, clients experienced low service care responsiveness characterized by long waiting times. Both clients and providers received inadequate feedback about services they received and delivered respectively, in addition to prompt care being received by a few clients. For client-insurer expectations, under unclear service packages, clients received low-quality medicines. Lastly, for provider-insurer expectations, delayed payments, selective periodic assessments, and inadequate orientation of clients on insurance plans were most reported. Weak coordination between the client-provider and insurer did not support delivery processes for responsive service.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Health care service responsiveness was generally low. There is a need to commit resources to support the setting up of clearer service package orientation programs, and efficient monitoring and feedback platforms. Uganda's proposed National Health Insurance Act may use these findings to: Inform its design initiatives focusing on operating under realistic expectations, investment in quality improvement systems and coordination, and efficient and accountable client care relationships.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38053178
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10386-x
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-10386-x
pmc: PMC10698989
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1358Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e917-e933
pubmed: 30426557
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 01;13:502
pubmed: 24289045
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0160479
pubmed: 27579731
Health Aff (Millwood). 1988 Summer;7(3):197-208
pubmed: 3215617
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):
pubmed: 33893142
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr 19;11:85
pubmed: 21504599
BMC Nurs. 2019 Dec 03;18:61
pubmed: 31827387
Reprod Health. 2014 Aug 02;11:59
pubmed: 25086444
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):1002-1006
pubmed: 30261797
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov;86(11):857-63
pubmed: 19030691
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Aug 1;91(8):602-11
pubmed: 23940408
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Oct;23(5):503-9
pubmed: 21715557
Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):657-75
pubmed: 3292851
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020417
pubmed: 30356805
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0192973
pubmed: 29470545
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Oct 31;2(4):e000486
pubmed: 29225953
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 28;14(8):e0221649
pubmed: 31461495
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076
pubmed: 32369511
BMC Nurs. 2019 Feb 11;18:4
pubmed: 30792611
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jul 14;9:117
pubmed: 19602290
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0241311
pubmed: 33119666
Health Econ Rev. 2012 Jul 23;2(1):13
pubmed: 22828034