Movement predictability modulates sensorimotor processing.

SEP = somatosensory evoked potential TMS co-activation predictability sensory attenuation sensory feedback sensory gating short afferent inhibition

Journal

Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 13 06 2023
accepted: 30 10 2023
medline: 6 12 2023
pubmed: 6 12 2023
entrez: 6 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

An important factor for optimal sensorimotor control is how well we are able to predict sensory feedback from internal and external sources during movement. If predictability decreases due to external disturbances, the brain is able to adjust muscle activation and the filtering of incoming sensory inputs. However, little is known about sensorimotor adjustments when predictability is increased by availability of additional internal feedback. In the present study we investigated how modifications of internal and external sensory feedback influence the control of muscle activation and gating of sensory input. Co-activation of forearm muscles, somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and short afferent inhibition (SAI) were assessed during three object manipulation tasks designed to differ in the predictability of sensory feedback. These included manipulation of a shared object with both hands (predictable coupling), manipulation of two independent objects without (uncoupled) and with external interference on one of the objects (unpredictable coupling). We found a task-specific reduction in co-activation during the predictable coupling compared to the other tasks. Less sensory gating, reflected in larger subcortical SEP amplitudes, was observed in the unpredictable coupling task. SAI behavior was closely linked to the subcortical SEP component indicating an important function of subcortical sites in predictability related SEP gating and their direct influence on M1 inhibition. Together, these findings suggest that the unpredictable coupling task cannot only rely on predictive forward control and is compensated by enhancing co-activation and increasing the saliency for external stimuli by reducing sensory gating at subcortical level. This behavior might serve as a preparatory step to compensate for external disturbances and to enhance processing and integration of all incoming external stimuli to update the current sensorimotor state. In contrast, predictive forward control is accurate in the predictable coupling task due to the integrated sensory feedback from both hands where sensorimotor resources are economized by reducing muscular co-activation and increasing sensory gating.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38053650
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1237407
pmc: PMC10694232
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1237407

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Altermatt, Thomas and Wenderoth.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Nature. 1975 Nov 27;258(5533):321-4
pubmed: 1196355
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(1):77-86
pubmed: 10550505
J Physiol. 2002 Oct 15;544(2):617-29
pubmed: 12381831
Neuroscience. 2016 Oct 1;333:104-13
pubmed: 27425210
Neuroreport. 2014 Dec 17;25(18):1429-32
pubmed: 25340563
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Apr;27(7):1867-75
pubmed: 18371084
Science. 2003 Jul 11;301(5630):187
pubmed: 12855800
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Dec;67(6):537-48
pubmed: 2445546
Elife. 2019 Sep 16;8:
pubmed: 31524600
Neuron. 2011 Nov 3;72(3):425-42
pubmed: 22078503
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 15;38(33):7237-7247
pubmed: 29976624
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986 Mar;65(2):118-29
pubmed: 2419100
Neuroreport. 2000 Aug 3;11(11):R11-6
pubmed: 10943682
Nature. 2001 Nov 22;414(6862):446-9
pubmed: 11719805
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Apr;25(4):948-58
pubmed: 24122137
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2253-2259
pubmed: 24775920
Brain. 1981 Sep;104(3):465-91
pubmed: 7272711
J Neurophysiol. 2001 May;85(5):2236-44
pubmed: 11353038
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 May;68(3):187-201
pubmed: 2436878
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Jul;62(4):252-65
pubmed: 2408872
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Apr 1;121(4):1162-1170
pubmed: 30726158
Pain. 2021 Jul 1;162(7):2060-2069
pubmed: 33863857
J Neurol. 1982;228(1):39-47
pubmed: 6184457
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Mar;217(1):53-66
pubmed: 22169978
J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 15;18(18):7511-8
pubmed: 9736669
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep;104(5):402-10
pubmed: 9344076
Brain Stimul. 2011 Oct;4(4):202-9
pubmed: 22032735
J Physiol. 2000 Mar 1;523 Pt 2:503-13
pubmed: 10699092
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;116(11):2592-8
pubmed: 16221561
Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 11;4:172
pubmed: 23596429
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Mar;69(3):943-52
pubmed: 8385202
Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(1):59-71
pubmed: 3416958
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Aug;119(8):1705-1719
pubmed: 18486546
Neuroimage. 1999 Oct;10(4):408-16
pubmed: 10493899
Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2
pubmed: 7569931
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1997 Sep;7(3):179-86
pubmed: 20719703
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 26;5(10):e13601
pubmed: 21049061
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 19;36(42):10803-10812
pubmed: 27798135
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Sep;11(5):551-9
pubmed: 10511643
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Nov;240(11):2923-2937
pubmed: 36123539
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 13;8(1):5959
pubmed: 29654286
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981 Oct;44(10):942-9
pubmed: 7310412
Cogn Process. 2013 Nov;14(4):411-27
pubmed: 23744445
Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Oct;18(8):2396-402
pubmed: 14622202
Neuroreport. 2001 Jul 3;12(9):1879-84
pubmed: 11435916
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug 1;116(2):637-44
pubmed: 27226451

Auteurs

Miriam Altermatt (M)

Neural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Felix Alexander Thomas (FA)

Neural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Nicole Wenderoth (N)

Neural Control of Movement Lab, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH