Successful restoration of failed Achilles tendon surgery with semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft: a case report.

Achilles tendon gracilis tendon graft partial tear semitendinosus tendon graft surgery

Journal

Frontiers in surgery
ISSN: 2296-875X
Titre abrégé: Front Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101645127

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 02 06 2023
accepted: 17 10 2023
medline: 6 12 2023
pubmed: 6 12 2023
entrez: 6 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This case presentation aims to highlight the challenges and outcomes associated with a partial tear of the Achilles tendon (AT) in an elite marathon runner. The objective was to restore tendon anatomy and optimize strength recovery through surgical intervention. We present the case of a marathon runner who suffered a partial AT tear and underwent an initial surgery that failed. A revision surgery was then performed using a semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft. The patient underwent surgery 14 weeks after the initial AT injury, but unfortunately experienced a complete AT tear after 6 months. However, the novel aspect of this case is the successful restoration of the failed double-row suture technique through the utilization of a semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft. Notably, the graft remained intact even under high tendon loading during the 2-year follow-up period. Differential diagnosis should consider partial tears of the AT as a possible diagnosis in the patients with heel pain. Furthermore, it is crucial to prioritize a well-paced post-surgical rehabilitation process in AT surgeries. In cases of failed AT surgery, the utilization of gracilis and semitendinosus tendon grafts can serve as viable options for repairing reruptures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38053719
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1233502
pmc: PMC10694234
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

1233502

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Hung, Alizargar, Alizargar, Hung, Chen and Pan.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Open Orthop J. 2017 Jul 31;11:697-703
pubmed: 28979583
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 May 25;6(5):2325967118774302
pubmed: 29854862
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2020 Jul;37(3):553-568
pubmed: 32471618
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Oct;26(5):513-9
pubmed: 25261286
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jul;30(7):2477-2484
pubmed: 35396938
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499019832717
pubmed: 30808253
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Nov 26;6(11):2325967118808238
pubmed: 30505872
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;110(6):
pubmed: 33301587
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Jul;35(7):699-705
pubmed: 24722009
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):668-9
pubmed: 26622031
Br J Sports Med. 2022 May;56(9):515-520
pubmed: 35144918
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 21;9(10):
pubmed: 33096900
Balkan Med J. 2016 May;33(3):258-66
pubmed: 27308069

Auteurs

Yu-Tun Hung (YT)

Department of Medicine, Hualien Armed Forces General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

Elaheh Alizargar (E)

Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Javad Alizargar (J)

School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.

Kun-Chin Hung (KC)

Department of Medicine, Kwan Hua Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.

Chien-Min Chen (CM)

Department of Neurosurgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.

Ru-Yu Pan (RY)

Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

Classifications MeSH