Severe infections requiring intensive care unit admission in patients receiving ibrutinib for hematological malignancies: a groupe de recherche respiratoire en réanimation onco-hématologique (GRRR-OH) study.
Ibrutinib
Intensive care
Lymphoproliferative disease
Opportunistic infections
Targeted drugs
Journal
Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Dec 2023
06 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
12
09
2023
accepted:
22
11
2023
medline:
6
12
2023
pubmed:
6
12
2023
entrez:
6
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the last decade, Ibrutinib has become the standard of care in the treatment of several lymphoproliferative diseases such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and several non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Beyond Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition, Ibrutinib shows broad immunomodulatory effects that may promote the occurrence of infectious complications, including opportunistic infections. The infectious burden has been shown to vary by disease status, neutropenia, and prior therapy but data focusing on severe infections requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission remain scarce. We sought to investigate features and outcomes of severe infections in a multicenter cohort of 69 patients receiving ibrutinib admitted to 10 French intensive care units (ICU) from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2020. Median time from ibrutinib initiation was 6.6 [3-18] months. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) accounted for 19% (n = 13/69) of severe infections, including 9 (69%; n = 9/13) invasive aspergillosis, 3 (23%; n = 3/13) Pneumocystis pneumonia, and 1 (8%; n = 1/13) cryptococcosis. Most common organ injury was acute respiratory failure (ARF) (71%; n = 49/69) and 41% (n = 28/69) of patients required mechanical ventilation. Twenty (29%; n = 20/69) patients died in the ICU while day-90 mortality reached 55% (n = 35/64). In comparison with survivors, decedents displayed more severe organ dysfunctions (SOFA 7 [5-11] vs. 4 [3-7], p = 0.004) and were more likely to undergo mechanical ventilation (68% vs. 31%, p = 0.010). Sixty-three ibrutinib-treated patients were matched based on age and underlying malignancy with 63 controls receiving conventional chemotherapy from an historic cohort. Despite a higher median number of prior chemotherapy lines (2 [1-2] vs. 0 [0-2]; p < 0.001) and higher rates of fungal [21% vs. 8%, p = 0.001] and viral [17% vs. 5%, p = 0.027] infections in patients receiving ibrutinib, ICU (27% vs. 38%, p = 0.254) and day-90 mortality (52% vs. 48%, p = 0.785) were similar between the two groups. In ibrutinib-treated patients, severe infections requiring ICU admission were associated with a dismal prognosis, mostly impacted by initial organ failures. Opportunistic agents should be systematically screened by ICU clinicians in this immunocompromised population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the last decade, Ibrutinib has become the standard of care in the treatment of several lymphoproliferative diseases such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and several non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Beyond Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition, Ibrutinib shows broad immunomodulatory effects that may promote the occurrence of infectious complications, including opportunistic infections. The infectious burden has been shown to vary by disease status, neutropenia, and prior therapy but data focusing on severe infections requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission remain scarce. We sought to investigate features and outcomes of severe infections in a multicenter cohort of 69 patients receiving ibrutinib admitted to 10 French intensive care units (ICU) from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2020.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Median time from ibrutinib initiation was 6.6 [3-18] months. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) accounted for 19% (n = 13/69) of severe infections, including 9 (69%; n = 9/13) invasive aspergillosis, 3 (23%; n = 3/13) Pneumocystis pneumonia, and 1 (8%; n = 1/13) cryptococcosis. Most common organ injury was acute respiratory failure (ARF) (71%; n = 49/69) and 41% (n = 28/69) of patients required mechanical ventilation. Twenty (29%; n = 20/69) patients died in the ICU while day-90 mortality reached 55% (n = 35/64). In comparison with survivors, decedents displayed more severe organ dysfunctions (SOFA 7 [5-11] vs. 4 [3-7], p = 0.004) and were more likely to undergo mechanical ventilation (68% vs. 31%, p = 0.010). Sixty-three ibrutinib-treated patients were matched based on age and underlying malignancy with 63 controls receiving conventional chemotherapy from an historic cohort. Despite a higher median number of prior chemotherapy lines (2 [1-2] vs. 0 [0-2]; p < 0.001) and higher rates of fungal [21% vs. 8%, p = 0.001] and viral [17% vs. 5%, p = 0.027] infections in patients receiving ibrutinib, ICU (27% vs. 38%, p = 0.254) and day-90 mortality (52% vs. 48%, p = 0.785) were similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In ibrutinib-treated patients, severe infections requiring ICU admission were associated with a dismal prognosis, mostly impacted by initial organ failures. Opportunistic agents should be systematically screened by ICU clinicians in this immunocompromised population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38055081
doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01219-5
pii: 10.1186/s13613-023-01219-5
pmc: PMC10700278
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
123Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Blood. 2020 Sep 3;136(10):1134-1143
pubmed: 32688395
Am J Hematol. 2021 Dec 1;96(12):1679-1705
pubmed: 34625994
Ann Oncol. 2021 Jan;32(1):23-33
pubmed: 33091559
Blood. 2004 Aug 15;104(4):1191-7
pubmed: 15117762
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1367-1376
pubmed: 31802125
Blood. 2018 Nov 1;132(18):1869-1870
pubmed: 30385492
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):80-7
pubmed: 26182309
Am J Hematol. 2019 Dec;94(12):1353-1363
pubmed: 31512258
Blood. 2018 Apr 26;131(17):1955-1959
pubmed: 29437588
EMBO Mol Med. 2015 Jan 30;7(3):240-58
pubmed: 25637383
Blood. 2015 Nov 5;126(19):2213-9
pubmed: 26337493
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7629-7640
pubmed: 34558211
Blood. 2018 Nov 1;132(18):1985-1988
pubmed: 30021784
J Leukoc Biol. 2021 Jan;109(1):49-53
pubmed: 32640487
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 27;379(26):2517-2528
pubmed: 30501481
Cancer Cell. 2017 Jun 12;31(6):833-843.e5
pubmed: 28552327
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 17;373(25):2425-37
pubmed: 26639149
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 1;31(22):2810-8
pubmed: 23752112
Eur J Haematol. 2018 Apr;100(4):325-334
pubmed: 29285806
Am J Infect Control. 1988 Jun;16(3):128-40
pubmed: 2841893
Hematol Oncol. 2023 Feb;41(1):128-138
pubmed: 36265128
Haematologica. 2020 Jan 31;105(2):478-489
pubmed: 31171644
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Oct;18(10):648-657.e15
pubmed: 30061088
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2016;393:67-105
pubmed: 26341110
Leuk Res. 2021 Mar;102:106520
pubmed: 33611131
Blood. 2019 Mar 21;133(12):1298-1307
pubmed: 30642919
Leukemia. 2019 Oct;33(10):2527-2530
pubmed: 31086260
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):213-23
pubmed: 24881631
Blood. 2014 Mar 20;123(12):1957-60
pubmed: 24652965
Blood Adv. 2022 Jun 14;6(11):3440-3450
pubmed: 35377947
J Immunol. 2017 Feb 15;198(4):1740-1747
pubmed: 28077600
Blood. 2020 Oct 29;136(18):2038-2050
pubmed: 32731259
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Oct 27;13:3843-3851
pubmed: 33149629
Immunology. 2021 Dec;164(4):722-736
pubmed: 34534359
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Apr;42:1-15
pubmed: 35561299
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 25;75(2):334-337
pubmed: 34893821
Blood Rev. 2016 May;30(3):233-44
pubmed: 26776345
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):241-250
pubmed: 27956157
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):687-692
pubmed: 29509845
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 24;9(5):ofac104
pubmed: 35493119
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;39(31):3441-3452
pubmed: 34310172
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(1):140-148
pubmed: 29029010
Am J Hematol. 2021 Feb 1;96(2):258-269
pubmed: 33368476
Target Oncol. 2022 Jan;17(1):69-84
pubmed: 34905129