Determinants of congenital syphilis in Fortaleza, Brazil: A retrospective case-control study.
Journal
PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
25
05
2023
accepted:
23
10
2023
medline:
6
12
2023
pubmed:
6
12
2023
entrez:
6
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Congenital syphilis (CS) is a significant public health problem in Brazil. Despite efforts to increase syphilis testing and treatment among pregnant women, rates of CS in the country remain high. We conducted a retrospective case-control study to identify potential associations between the mothers' sociodemographic characteristics, clinical factors related to the current and previous pregnancies, and the occurrence of CS among newborns in Fortaleza, a populous city with one of the highest incidences of CS in Brazil. Data from newborns diagnosed with CS between 2017 and 2020 were extracted from SINAN, the national database for notifiable diseases. Data from women who had delivered an infant with CS were extracted from SINASC, the national database for registration of live births, and linked with their infant's data. CS cases and non-CS controls were matched by year of birth at a ratio of 1:3 respectively. Potential associations were estimated using a multivariate regression model accounting for sociodemographic, obstetric, and antenatal care-related factors. Epidemiological data from 8,744 live births were included in the analysis, including 2,186 cases and 6,588 controls. The final multivariate regression model identified increased odds of delivering an infant with CS among pregnant women and girls aged below 20 years (OR 1.29), single women (OR 1.48), women who had less than 8 years of formal education (OR 2.42), women who delivered in a public hospital (OR 6.92), women who had more than 4 previous pregnancies (OR 1.60), and women who had one or more prior fetal loss (OR 1.19). The odds of delivering an infant with CS also increased as the number of antenatal visits decreased. Women who did not attend any antenatal visits had 3.94 times the odds of delivering an infant with CS compared to women who attended 7 or more visits. Our study found that increased odds of delivering an infant with CS were highly associated with factors related to socioeconomic vulnerability. These determinants not only affect the access to essential antenatal care services, but also the continuity and quality of such preventive measures. Future policies aimed at reducing the incidence of CS should not only target those pregnant women and adolescents with identifiable risk factors for testing, but also assure high quality care, treatment and follow-up for this group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38055689
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002626
pii: PGPH-D-23-01012
pmc: PMC10699632
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0002626Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Etti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019 Mar 15;43:e31
pubmed: 31093255
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 18;:
pubmed: 37604180
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Mar 14;7:100233
pubmed: 36777655
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Jun;82(6):424-30
pubmed: 15356934
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 24;19(1):65
pubmed: 30678672
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231029
pubmed: 32271807
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;29(3):268-74
pubmed: 27078816
Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):301-302
pubmed: 32738942
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021 Mar 15;30(spe1):e2020616
pubmed: 33729409
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020312
pubmed: 31656601
Birth Defects Res. 2017 Mar 15;109(5):347-352
pubmed: 28398683
Cien Saude Colet. 2009 Sep-Oct;14(5):1773-9
pubmed: 19851589
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0211720
pubmed: 30811406
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40756
pubmed: 22808252
Rev Saude Publica. 2013 Feb;47(1):147-56; discussion 157
pubmed: 23703141
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Dec 27;7:100163
pubmed: 36777651
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 8;21(1):616
pubmed: 34496791
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:3
pubmed: 25741656