Inaccessibility, unresponsiveness, inconsistency, and invisibility of informal caregivers of older persons with cognitive impairment: community-based participatory research.
Caregivers
Cognitive impairment
Family caregiver
Informal caregiver
Japan
Older persons
Traditional caregiver
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Dec 2023
06 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
26
05
2023
accepted:
30
11
2023
medline:
11
12
2023
pubmed:
7
12
2023
entrez:
6
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Studies on informal caregivers in Japan have been limited to family caregivers and largely conducted where family caregivers generally gather. Family caregivers who do not visit such places or non-family caregivers are generally overlooked, and data on these informal caregivers remains scant. Consequently, a framework is needed through which healthcare professionals can approach the informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons. Therefore, this study approaches such informal caregivers and proposes a classification system for them from the starting point of older persons living in the community with cognitive impairment. In 2016, we conducted an epidemiological survey of 7000 + community-dwelling older persons and identified 198 residents with Mini-mental state examination scores less than 23. A team of healthcare professionals contacted them regularly. By 2022, 92 people were still living in the community, and we systematically asked them about their informal caregivers. After approaching the caregivers and obtaining informed consent, we mailed separate questionnaires to older persons and informal caregivers. Among the caregivers, 59%, 34%, and 3% were the child, spouse, and sibling of the older person, while the remaining 4% were non-family caregivers. Except for two daughters-in-laws, all children were biological children of the older person. Male caregivers (46%) tended to have full-time jobs, whereas female caregivers (54%) tended to face financial difficulties. Only 3% of the caregivers had joined a family caregivers' association. Caregivers' reason for not joining such organizations was a lack of time and knowledge. A 3-tiered classification system was developed for these informal caregivers: (1) the household form, (2) accessibility, and (3) the reciprocal awareness of caregiving. Furthermore, family caregivers who lived with the older person or visited them more than once a week with reciprocal awareness of caring and being cared, or "traditional caregivers," accounted for 68% of the caregivers in this study. Core family caregivers can be easily approached at places where such caregivers generally gather. However, there also exists a group of informal caregivers who are sometimes inaccessible, unresponsive, and invisible to healthcare professionals. Moreover, their awareness of caregiving is sometimes inconsistent.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Studies on informal caregivers in Japan have been limited to family caregivers and largely conducted where family caregivers generally gather. Family caregivers who do not visit such places or non-family caregivers are generally overlooked, and data on these informal caregivers remains scant. Consequently, a framework is needed through which healthcare professionals can approach the informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons. Therefore, this study approaches such informal caregivers and proposes a classification system for them from the starting point of older persons living in the community with cognitive impairment.
METHODS
METHODS
In 2016, we conducted an epidemiological survey of 7000 + community-dwelling older persons and identified 198 residents with Mini-mental state examination scores less than 23. A team of healthcare professionals contacted them regularly. By 2022, 92 people were still living in the community, and we systematically asked them about their informal caregivers. After approaching the caregivers and obtaining informed consent, we mailed separate questionnaires to older persons and informal caregivers.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the caregivers, 59%, 34%, and 3% were the child, spouse, and sibling of the older person, while the remaining 4% were non-family caregivers. Except for two daughters-in-laws, all children were biological children of the older person. Male caregivers (46%) tended to have full-time jobs, whereas female caregivers (54%) tended to face financial difficulties. Only 3% of the caregivers had joined a family caregivers' association. Caregivers' reason for not joining such organizations was a lack of time and knowledge. A 3-tiered classification system was developed for these informal caregivers: (1) the household form, (2) accessibility, and (3) the reciprocal awareness of caregiving. Furthermore, family caregivers who lived with the older person or visited them more than once a week with reciprocal awareness of caring and being cared, or "traditional caregivers," accounted for 68% of the caregivers in this study.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Core family caregivers can be easily approached at places where such caregivers generally gather. However, there also exists a group of informal caregivers who are sometimes inaccessible, unresponsive, and invisible to healthcare professionals. Moreover, their awareness of caregiving is sometimes inconsistent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38057710
doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04542-5
pii: 10.1186/s12877-023-04542-5
pmc: PMC10702127
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
812Subventions
Organisme : Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant
ID : 22GB0301
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Jun;20(6):564-570
pubmed: 32291907
Psychol Aging. 2003 Jun;18(2):250-67
pubmed: 12825775
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2021;58(2):255-265
pubmed: 34039802
Clin Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;27(1):12-34
pubmed: 27864478
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 14;:
pubmed: 33055092
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2004 Apr;51(4):240-51
pubmed: 15162970
Psychogeriatrics. 2022 May;22(3):332-342
pubmed: 35199417
SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Jul 22;7:23779608211029073
pubmed: 35155770
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2016;63(4):179-89
pubmed: 27181345
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 17;20(1):68
pubmed: 32066387
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Oct;14(10):1334-1343
pubmed: 30293575