Prehospital COVID-19 patients discharged at the scene - an observational study.
Covid-19
Emergency Medical Services
Non-conveyance
Prehospital
Journal
BMC emergency medicine
ISSN: 1471-227X
Titre abrégé: BMC Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Dec 2023
06 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
13
09
2023
accepted:
28
11
2023
medline:
11
12
2023
pubmed:
7
12
2023
entrez:
6
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emergency medical services (EMS) were the first point of contact for many COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the non-conveyance decision of a COVID-19 patient was more frequently associated with a new EMS call than direct ambulance transport to the hospital. All confirmed COVID-19 patients with an EMS call within 14 days of symptom onset were included in the study. Patients were compared based on their prehospital transport decision (transport vs. non-conveyance). The primary endpoint was a new EMS call within 10 days leading to ambulance transport. A total of 1 286 patients met the study criteria; of these, 605 (47.0%) were male with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 50.5 (SD 19.3) years. The most common dispatch codes were dyspnea in 656 (51.0%) and malaise in 364 (28.3%) calls. High-priority dispatch was used in 220 (17.1%) cases. After prehospital evaluation, 586 (45.6%) patients were discharged at the scene. Oxygen was given to 159 (12.4%) patients, of whom all but one were transported. A new EMS call leading to ambulance transport was observed in 133 (10.3%) cases; of these, 40 (30.1%) were in the group primarily transported and 93 (69.9%) were among the patients who were primarily discharged at the scene (p<.001). There were no significant differences in past medical history, presence of abnormal vital signs, or total NEWS score. Supplemental oxygen was given to 33 (24.8%) patients; 3 (2.3%) patients received other medications. Nearly half of all prehospital COVID-19 patients could be discharged at the scene. Approximately every sixth of these had a new EMS call and ambulance transport within the following 10 days. No significant deterioration was seen among patients primarily discharged at the scene. EMS was able to safely adjust its performance during the first pandemic wave to avoid ED overcrowding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Emergency medical services (EMS) were the first point of contact for many COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the non-conveyance decision of a COVID-19 patient was more frequently associated with a new EMS call than direct ambulance transport to the hospital.
METHODS
METHODS
All confirmed COVID-19 patients with an EMS call within 14 days of symptom onset were included in the study. Patients were compared based on their prehospital transport decision (transport vs. non-conveyance). The primary endpoint was a new EMS call within 10 days leading to ambulance transport.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 1 286 patients met the study criteria; of these, 605 (47.0%) were male with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 50.5 (SD 19.3) years. The most common dispatch codes were dyspnea in 656 (51.0%) and malaise in 364 (28.3%) calls. High-priority dispatch was used in 220 (17.1%) cases. After prehospital evaluation, 586 (45.6%) patients were discharged at the scene. Oxygen was given to 159 (12.4%) patients, of whom all but one were transported. A new EMS call leading to ambulance transport was observed in 133 (10.3%) cases; of these, 40 (30.1%) were in the group primarily transported and 93 (69.9%) were among the patients who were primarily discharged at the scene (p<.001). There were no significant differences in past medical history, presence of abnormal vital signs, or total NEWS score. Supplemental oxygen was given to 33 (24.8%) patients; 3 (2.3%) patients received other medications.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Nearly half of all prehospital COVID-19 patients could be discharged at the scene. Approximately every sixth of these had a new EMS call and ambulance transport within the following 10 days. No significant deterioration was seen among patients primarily discharged at the scene. EMS was able to safely adjust its performance during the first pandemic wave to avoid ED overcrowding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38057712
doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00915-6
pii: 10.1186/s12873-023-00915-6
pmc: PMC10701921
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
145Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Public Health Rep. 2022 Jul-Aug;137(4):796-802
pubmed: 35642664
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7
pubmed: 18064739
BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e070379
pubmed: 35858689
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Jul 14;7(1):e534
pubmed: 32685173
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 May;66(5):625-633
pubmed: 35170028
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1212-1217
pubmed: 32546823
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1763-1770
pubmed: 32442528
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):115
pubmed: 34627138
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Aug;30(8):2197-2205
pubmed: 36974739
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:260-266
pubmed: 33008702
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 29;26(1):91
pubmed: 30373652
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;42:1-8
pubmed: 33429185
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 29;28(1):45
pubmed: 32471460
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Jul-Aug;20(4):539-49
pubmed: 26836060
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 19;29(1):95
pubmed: 34281612
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 May;61(5):549-556
pubmed: 28374471