A phase II/III randomised, comparative study evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of Biological E's live, attenuated Measles-Rubella vaccine in 9-12 month old healthy infants.
Congenital rubella syndrome
Immunogenicity
Measles
Rubella
Sero-protection
Journal
Contemporary clinical trials communications
ISSN: 2451-8654
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials Commun
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101671157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
28
07
2023
revised:
01
11
2023
accepted:
12
11
2023
medline:
7
12
2023
pubmed:
7
12
2023
entrez:
7
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Measles is a major cause of childhood mortality and one-third of the world's Measles deaths occur in India. Rubella causes lifelong birth defects (Congenital Rubella Syndrome). Although neither condition has a cure, the MR vaccination can successfully prevent both diseases. The safety of Biological E's live attenuated MR vaccine (BE-MR) was established in 4-5-year-old healthy children. This phase-2/3 study was conducted to assess the safety and immunogenicity of BE-MR in 9-12 month old healthy infants. Overall, 600 subjects were enrolled and equally randomized to receive either BE-MR (n = 300) or the comparator vaccine, SII MR-Vac™ (n = 300). Safety profile of BE-MR vaccine was comparable to SII MR-Vac™ with no severe or serious adverse events (AEs) reported across the study groups. The primary objective of demonstrating non inferiority by BE-MR vaccine compared to SIIL's-MR Vac™ was met. The proportion of subjects with ≥ 2-fold and ≥ 4-fold increase in antibody titre against Measles and Rubella in both the study groups was comparable. Overall, BE-MR vaccine elicited robust and protective immune response as demonstrated by high proportion of sero-protected subjects and a large increase in anti-Measles and anti-Rubella antibodies at day 42 and can be administered safely to infants below one-year of age. This study was prospectively registered with the clinical trial registry of India- CTRI/2016/07/007109.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38058513
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101232
pii: S2451-8654(23)00178-3
pmc: PMC10696430
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101232Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Employees of Biological E Limited do not have any stock options or incentives.
Références
Vaccine. 2020 May 19;38(24):4016-4023
pubmed: 32331806
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):360-361
pubmed: 33589823
Indian J Med Res. 1994 Oct;100:155-9
pubmed: 7851964
Indian J Med Res. 2023 Apr;157(4):250-258
pubmed: 37102515
Indian Pediatr. 2018 May 15;55(5):405-407
pubmed: 29428921
Indian J Med Res. 2003 Nov;118:183-6
pubmed: 14723482
Indian J Med Res. 2011 Sep;134:302-6
pubmed: 21985812
Vaccine. 2014 Jun 30;32(31):4001-5
pubmed: 24837773
Vaccine. 2000 Jul 15;18(27):3134-40
pubmed: 10856793
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Nov 25;71(47):1489-1495
pubmed: 36417303
Indian Pediatr. 2019 Sep 15;56(9):723-724
pubmed: 31638000
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Nov;8(11):e1399-e1407
pubmed: 33069300
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):1884-1888
pubmed: 31334150
Lancet. 2022 Apr 2;399(10332):1336-1346
pubmed: 35367004
Lancet. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2297-307
pubmed: 25576992
J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1;189 Suppl 1:S116-22
pubmed: 15106100
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;19(4):402-409
pubmed: 30833160
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1127-1128
pubmed: 34183836
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2490-2502
pubmed: 28673424