Proteome of spores from biological indicators in sterilization processes: Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus atrophaeus.

Bacillus atrophaeus DSM675 Bacillus pumilus DSM492 bioindicators proteome spores

Journal

Proteomics
ISSN: 1615-9861
Titre abrégé: Proteomics
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101092707

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Dec 2023
Historique:
revised: 16 11 2023
received: 31 07 2023
accepted: 17 11 2023
medline: 7 12 2023
pubmed: 7 12 2023
entrez: 7 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Bacillus atrophaeus and Bacillus pumilus spores are widely used as biological indicators to assess the effectiveness of decontamination procedures. Spores are intricate, multi-layered cellular structures primarily composed of proteins, which significantly contribute to their extreme resistance. Therefore, conducting a comprehensive proteome analysis of spores is crucial to identify the specific proteins conferring spore resistance. Here, we employed a high-throughput shotgun proteomic approach to compare the spore proteomes of B. atrophaeus DSM675 and B. pumilus DSM492, identifying 1312 and 1264 proteins, respectively. While the overall number of proteins found in both strains is roughly equivalent, a closer examination of a subset of 54 spore-specific proteins revealed noteworthy distinctions. Among these 54 proteins, 23 were exclusively detected in one strain, while others were shared between both. Notably, of the 31 proteins detected in both strains, 10 exhibited differential abundance levels, including key coat layer morphogenetic proteins. The exploration of these 54 proteins, considering their presence, absence, and differential abundance, provides a unique molecular signature that may elucidate the differences in sensitivity/resistance profiles between the two strains.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38059874
doi: 10.1002/pmic.202300293
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2300293

Subventions

Organisme : Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
ID : 21001028

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Proteomics published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Références

Boyce, J. M. (2016). Modern technologies for improving cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces in hospitals. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 5, 10.
Skåra, T., & Rosnes, J. T. (2016). Innovation and future trends in food manufacturing and supply chain technologies (C. E. Leadley, Ed., pp. 151-172). Woodhead Publishing.
Kim, Y., Ma, L., Huang, K., & Nitin, N. (2023). Bio-based antimicrobial compositions and sensing technologies to improve food safety. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 79, 102871.
ISO 11138-2:2017(en), Sterilization of health care products - Biological indicators - Part 2: Biological indicators for ethylene oxide sterilization processes n.d.
Jildeh, Z. B., Wagner, P. H., & Schöning, M. J. (2021). Sterilization of objects, products, and packaging surfaces and their characterization in different fields of industry: The Status in 2020. Physica Status Solidi (a), 218, 2000732.
Prince, H. N. (1976). Stability of Bacillus pumilus spore strips used for monitoring radiation sterilization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 31, 999-1000.
Nakamura, L. K. (1989). Taxonomic relationship of black-pigmented Bacillus subtilis strains and a proposal for Bacillus atrophaeus sp. nov. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 39, 295-300.
Burke, S. A., Wright, J. D., Robinson, M. K., Bronk, B. V., & Warren, R. L. (2004). Detection of molecular diversity in Bacillus atrophaeus by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 2786-2790.
Riley, E. P., Schwarz, C., Derman, A. I., & Lopez-Garrido, J. (2020). Milestones in Bacillus subtilis sporulation research. Microbial Cell, 8, 1-16.
Setlow, P. (2014). Germination of spores of Bacillus species: What we know and do not know. Journal of Bacteriology, 196, 1297-1305.
Setlow, P. (2014). Spore resistance properties. Microbiology Spectrum, 2(5), 2.5.11.
Setlow, P., & Christie, G. (2023). New thoughts on an old topic: Secrets of bacterial spore resistance slowly being revealed. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 87, e00080-22.
Cho, W.-I., & Chung, M.-S. (2020). Bacillus spores: A review of their properties and inactivation processing technologies. Food Science and Biotechnology, 29, 1447-1461.
Stewart, G. C. (2015). The exosporium layer of bacterial spores: a connection to the environment and the infected host. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 79, 437-457.
Leggett, M. J., Mcdonnell, G., Denyer, S. P., Setlow, P., & Maillard, J.-Y. (2012). Bacterial spore structures and their protective role in biocide resistance. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113, 485-498.
Mckenney, P. T., & Eichenberger, P. (2012). Dynamics of spore coat morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Microbiology, 83, 245-260.
Popham, D. L., & Bernhards, C. B. (2015). Spore Peptidoglycan. Microbiology Spectrum, 3(6), https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.tbs-0005-2012
Fernández, A., Ocio, M. J., Fernández, P. S, Rodrigo, M., & Martinez, A. (1999). Application of nonlinear regression analysis to the estimation of kinetic parameters for two enterotoxigenic strains of Bacillus cereus spores. Food Microbiology, 16, 607-613.
Hartmann, E. M., & Armengaud, J. (2014). Shotgun proteomics suggests involvement of additional enzymes in dioxin degradation by Sphingomonas wittichii   RW1. Environmental Microbiology, 16, 162-176.
Christie-Oleza, J. A., Fernandez, B., Nogales, B., Bosch, R., & Armengaud, J. (2012). Proteomic insights into the lifestyle of an environmentally relevant marine bacterium. The ISME Journal, 6, 124-135.
Cogne, Y., Almunia, C., Gouveia, D., Pible, O., François, A., Degli-Esposti, D., Geffard, O., Armengaud, J., & Chaumot, A. (2019). Comparative proteomics in the wild: Accounting for intrapopulation variability improves describing proteome response in a Gammarus pulex field population exposed to cadmium. Aquatic Toxicology, 214, 105244.
Swarge, B., Abhyankar, W., Jonker, M., Hoefsloot, H., Kramer, G., Setlow, P., Brul, S., & de Koning, L. J. (2020). Integrative analysis of proteome and transcriptome dynamics during Bacillus subtilis spore revival. mSphere, 5, e00463-20.
Mubeen, S., Tom Kodamullil, A., Hofmann-Apitius, M., & Domingo-Fernández, D. (2022). On the influence of several factors on pathway enrichment analysis. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23, bbac143.
Mappa, C., Pible, O., Armengaud, J., & Alpha-Bazin, B. (2021). Assessing the ratio of Bacillus spores and vegetative cells by shotgun proteomics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28, 25107-25115.
Tu, Z. R., Abhyankar, W. N., Swarge, B., Van Der Wel, N., Kramer, G., Brul, S., & de Koning, L. J. (2020). Artificial Sporulation Induction (ASI) by kinA overexpression affects the proteomes and properties of Bacillus subtilis Spores. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, 4315.
Whittaker, J. W. (2012). Non-heme manganese catalase-the ‘other’ catalase. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 525, 111-120.
Clair, G., Esbelin, J., Malléa, S., Bornard, I., & Carlin, F. (2020). The spore coat is essential for Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to pulsed light, and pulsed light treatment eliminates some spore coat proteins. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 323, 108592.

Auteurs

Imed Dorbani (I)

INRAE, Avignon Université, UMR SQPOV, Avignon, France.
Claranor SA, Avignon, France.

Jean Armengaud (J)

Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Université Paris Saclay, CEA, INRAE, Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France.

Frédéric Carlin (F)

INRAE, Avignon Université, UMR SQPOV, Avignon, France.

Catherine Duport (C)

Avignon Université, INRAE, UMR SQPOV, Avignon, France.

Classifications MeSH