The effect of deep learning-based lesion segmentation on failure load calculations of metastatic femurs using finite element analysis.

Bone fracture risk Deep learning Femur Finite element Lesion segmentation

Journal

Bone
ISSN: 1873-2763
Titre abrégé: Bone
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8504048

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 21 07 2023
revised: 29 11 2023
accepted: 04 12 2023
medline: 8 12 2023
pubmed: 8 12 2023
entrez: 7 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Bone ranks as the third most frequent tissue affected by cancer metastases, following the lung and liver. Bone metastases are often painful and may result in pathological fracture, which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. To quantify fracture risk, finite element (FE) analysis has shown to be a promising tool, but metastatic lesions are typically not specifically segmented and therefore their mechanical properties may not be represented adequately. Deep learning methods potentially provide the opportunity to automatically segment these lesions and change the mechanical properties more adequately. In this study, our primary focus was to gain insight into the performance of an automatic segmentation algorithm for femoral metastatic lesions using deep learning methods and the subsequent effects on FE outcomes. The aims were to determine the similarity between manual segmentation and automatic segmentation; the differences in predicted failure load between FE models with automatically segmented osteolytic and mixed lesions and the models with CT-based lesion values (the gold standard); and the effect on the BOne Strength (BOS) score (failure load adjusted for body weight) and subsequent fracture risk assessments. From two patient cohorts, a total number of 50 femurs with osteolytic and mixed metastatic lesions were included in this study. The femurs were segmented from CT images and transferred into FE meshes. The material behavior was implemented as non-linear isotropic. These FE models were considered as gold standard (Finite Element no Segmented Lesion: FE-no-SL), whereby the local calcium equivalent density of both femur and metastatic lesion was extracted from CT-values. Lesions in the femur were manually segmented by two biomechanical experts after which final lesion segmentation for each femur was obtained based on consensus of opinions between two observers. Subsequently, a self-configuring variant of the popular deep learning model U-Net known as nnU-Net was used to automatically segment metastatic lesions within the femur. For these models with segmented lesions (Finite Element with Segmented Lesion: FE-with-SL), the calcium equivalent density within the metastatic lesions was set to zero after being segmented by the neural network, simulating absence of load-bearing capacity of these lesions. The models (either with or without automatically segmented lesions) were loaded incrementally in axial direction until failure was simulated. Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the similarity of the manual and automatic segmentation. Mean calcium equivalent density values within the automatically segmented lesions were calculated. Failure loads and patterns were determined. Furthermore, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for both groups by comparing the predictions to the occurrence or absence of actual fracture within the patient cohorts. The automatic segmentation algorithm performed in a none-robust manner. Dice coefficients describing the similarity between consented manual and automatic segmentations were relatively low (mean 0.45 ± standard deviation 0.33, median 0.54). Failure load difference between the FE-no-SL and FE-with-SL groups varied from 0 % to 48 % (mean 6.6 %). Correlation analysis of failure loads between the two groups showed a strong relationship (R

Identifiants

pubmed: 38061504
pii: S8756-3282(23)00320-4
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116987
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

116987

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Ali Ataei (A)

Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Ali.Ataei@radboudumc.nl.

Florieke Eggermont (F)

Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Nico Verdonschot (N)

Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Laboratory for Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Nikolas Lessmann (N)

Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Esther Tanck (E)

Orthopaedic Research Lab, Radboud university medical center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH