A simpler diagnostic algorithm of the Japan Esophageal Society classification for Barrett's esophagus-related superficial neoplasia.
Barrett’s esophagus
Endoscopic classification
Japan Esophageal Society
Magnifying endoscopy
Narrow band imaging
Journal
Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society
ISSN: 1612-9067
Titre abrégé: Esophagus
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101206627
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Dec 2023
08 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
17
07
2023
accepted:
03
11
2023
medline:
8
12
2023
pubmed:
8
12
2023
entrez:
8
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We previously developed a Japan Esophageal Society Barrett's Esophagus (JES-BE) magnifying endoscopic classification for superficial BE-related neoplasms (BERN) and validated it in a nationwide multicenter study that followed a diagnostic flow chart based on mucosal and vascular patterns (MP, VP) with nine diagnostic criteria. Our present post hoc analysis aims to further simplify the diagnostic criteria for superficial BERN. We used data from our previous study, including 10 reviewers' assessments for 156 images of high-magnifying narrow-band imaging (HM-NBI) (67 dysplastic and 89 non-dysplastic histology). We statistically analyzed the diagnostic performance of each diagnostic criterion of MP (form, size, arrangement, density, and white zone), VP (form, caliber change, location, and greenish thick vessels [GTV]), and all their combinations to achieve a simpler diagnostic algorithm to detect superficial BERN. Diagnostic accuracy values based on the MP of each single criterion or combined criteria showed a marked trend of being higher than those based on VP. In reviewers' assessments of visible MPs, the combination of irregularity for form, size, or white zone had the highest diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 91% for dysplastic histology; in the assessments of invisible MPs, GTV had the highest diagnostic performance among the VP of each single criterion and all combinations of two or more criteria (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 92%). The present post hoc analysis suggests the feasibility of further simplifying the diagnostic algorithm of the JES-BE classification. Further studies in a practical setting are required to validate these results.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
We previously developed a Japan Esophageal Society Barrett's Esophagus (JES-BE) magnifying endoscopic classification for superficial BE-related neoplasms (BERN) and validated it in a nationwide multicenter study that followed a diagnostic flow chart based on mucosal and vascular patterns (MP, VP) with nine diagnostic criteria. Our present post hoc analysis aims to further simplify the diagnostic criteria for superficial BERN.
METHODS
METHODS
We used data from our previous study, including 10 reviewers' assessments for 156 images of high-magnifying narrow-band imaging (HM-NBI) (67 dysplastic and 89 non-dysplastic histology). We statistically analyzed the diagnostic performance of each diagnostic criterion of MP (form, size, arrangement, density, and white zone), VP (form, caliber change, location, and greenish thick vessels [GTV]), and all their combinations to achieve a simpler diagnostic algorithm to detect superficial BERN.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Diagnostic accuracy values based on the MP of each single criterion or combined criteria showed a marked trend of being higher than those based on VP. In reviewers' assessments of visible MPs, the combination of irregularity for form, size, or white zone had the highest diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 91% for dysplastic histology; in the assessments of invisible MPs, GTV had the highest diagnostic performance among the VP of each single criterion and all combinations of two or more criteria (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 92%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The present post hoc analysis suggests the feasibility of further simplifying the diagnostic algorithm of the JES-BE classification. Further studies in a practical setting are required to validate these results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38064022
doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01029-5
pii: 10.1007/s10388-023-01029-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.
Références
Desai TK, Krishnan K, Samala N, et al. The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett’s oesophagus: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2012;61:970–6.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300730
pubmed: 21997553
Hongo M, Nagasaki Y, Shoji T. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer: Orient to Occident. Effects of chronology, geography and ethnicity. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:729–35.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05824.x
pubmed: 19646015
Wang Z, Shaheen NJ, Whiteman DC, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with reduced risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an analysis of the Barrett’s and esophageal adenocarcinoma consortium. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1148–55.
doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0070-3
pubmed: 29880962
Mansour NM, Groth SS, Anandasabapathy S. Esophageal adenocarcinoma: screening, surveillance, and management. Annu Rev Med. 2017;68:213–27.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050715-104218
pubmed: 27618753
Abe S, Ishihara R, Takahashi H, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection and metachronous cancer after endoscopic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:1120–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.010
pubmed: 30576649
Oyama T, Inoue H, Arima M, et al. Prediction of the invasion depth of superficial squamous cell carcinoma based on microvessel morphology: magnifying endoscopic classification of the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus. 2017;14:105–12.
doi: 10.1007/s10388-016-0527-7
pubmed: 28386209
Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:526–33.
doi: 10.1111/den.12644
pubmed: 26927367
Yao K, Anagnostopoulos GK, Ragunath K. Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosing and delineating early gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2009;41:462–7.
doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214594
pubmed: 19418401
Singh M, Bansal A, Curvers WL, et al. Observer agreement in the assessment of narrowband imaging system surface patterns in Barrett’s esophagus: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:745–51.
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256631
pubmed: 21833901
Silva FB, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Vieth M, et al. Endoscopic assessment and grading of Barrett’s esophagus using magnification endoscopy and narrow-band imaging: accuracy and interobserver agreement of different classification systems (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:7–14.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.023
pubmed: 21184868
Curvers WL, Bohmer CJ, Mallant-Hent RC, et al. Mucosal morphology in Barrett’s esophagus: interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging. Endoscopy. 2008;40:799–805.
doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077596
pubmed: 18828075
Baldaque-Silva F, Marques M, Lunet N, et al. Endoscopic assessment and grading of Barrett’s esophagus using magnification endoscopy and narrow band imaging: impact of structured learning and experience on the accuracy of the Amsterdam classification system. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:160–7.
doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.746392
pubmed: 23215965
Goda K, Fujisaki J, Ishihara R, et al. Newly developed magnifying endoscopic classification of the Japan Esophageal Society to identify superficial Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasms. Esophagus. 2018;15:153–9.
doi: 10.1007/s10388-018-0623-y
pubmed: 29923024
pmcid: 6021472
Goda K, Takeuchi M, Ishihara R, et al. Diagnostic utility of a novel magnifying endoscopic classification system for superficial Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasms: a nationwide multicenter study. Esophagus. 2021;18:713–23.
doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00841-1
pubmed: 34052965
pmcid: 8387266
Kato M, Goda K, Shimizu Y, et al. Image assessment of Barrett’s esophagus using the simplified narrow band imaging classification. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:466–75.
doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1239-4
pubmed: 27448208
Furuhashi H, Goda K, Shimizu Y, et al. Feasibility of a simplified narrow-band imaging classification system for Barrett’s esophagus for novice endoscopists. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:587–96.
doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-01537-7
pubmed: 30603885
Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251–5.
doi: 10.1136/gut.47.2.251
pubmed: 10896917
pmcid: 1728018
Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32–5.
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3
pubmed: 15405679
Shan G. Improved confidence intervals for the Youden index. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0127272.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127272
pubmed: 26132806
pmcid: 4488538
ASGE Technology Committee, Thosani N, Abu Dayyeh BK, et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta- analysis assessing the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations thresholds for adopting real-time imaging-assisted endoscopic targeted biopsy during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:684-98.e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007
Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc. 2020;32:452–93.
doi: 10.1111/den.13654
pubmed: 32072683
Ikenoyama Y, Tanaka K, Umeda Y, et al. Effect of adding acetic acid when performing magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for diagnosis of Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endosc Int Open. 2022;10:E1528–36.
doi: 10.1055/a-1948-2910
pubmed: 36531673
pmcid: 9754883
Kara MA, Ennahachi M, Fockens P, et al. Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology) in Barrett’s esophagus by using narrow band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:155–66.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.049
pubmed: 16860062
Sharma P, Bansal A, Mathur S, et al. The utility of a novel narrow band imaging endoscopy system in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:167–75.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.10.044
pubmed: 16860063
Goda K, Tajiri H, Ikegami M, et al. Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for the detection of specialized intestinal metaplasia in columnar-lined esophagus and Barrett’s adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:36–46.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.938
pubmed: 17185078
Anagnostopoulos GK, Yao K, Kaye P, et al. Novel endoscopic observation in Barrett’s oesophagus using high resolution magnification endoscopy and narrow band imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:501–7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03374.x
pubmed: 17635385
Azuma N, Endo T, Arimura Y, et al. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus and expression of mucin antigens detected by a panel of monoclonal antibodies in Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:583–92.
doi: 10.1007/s005350070057
pubmed: 10955596
Curvers WL, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, et al. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1523–30.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.171
pubmed: 20461069