Novel Hematological Parameters in the Assessment of the Extent of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infections.

cardiac implantable electronic device-related infections extension of CIED-related infections hematological parameters vegetations

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 03 11 2023
revised: 29 11 2023
accepted: 30 11 2023
medline: 9 12 2023
pubmed: 9 12 2023
entrez: 9 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patients with infectious complications related to the presence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) constitute a heterogeneous group, ranging from local pocket infection (PI) to lead-related infectious endocarditis (LRIE) infection spreading along the leads to the endocardium. The detection of isolated LRIE and the assessment of the spread of infection in a patient with PI is often difficult and requires complex imaging and microbiological tests. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the usefulness of new simple hematological parameters in detecting infectious complications in patients with CIED, differentiating vegetation and vegetation-like masses, and assessing the extent of infections in patients with PI. A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 2909 patients (36.37% with CIED-related infections), undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures in three high-volume centres in the years 2006-2020, was conducted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), and lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (LPR) in the diagnosis of CIED infections, evaluate the spread of the infectious process in patients with PI and differentiate additional structures related to the presence of lead. The values of NLR and NPR were significantly higher in infectious patients than non-infectious controls (3.07 vs. 2.59; Novel hematological markers (NLR and NPR) are characterized by high specificity in the initial diagnosis of CIED infections, with optimal cut-off values of 3.06 and 0.02. NLR is also useful in the assessment of the spread of infection in patients with PI, with a calculated optimal cut-off value of 3.13. NPR may be helpful in the differentiation of vegetation and vegetation-like masses with an optimal cut-off value of 0.03.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with infectious complications related to the presence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) constitute a heterogeneous group, ranging from local pocket infection (PI) to lead-related infectious endocarditis (LRIE) infection spreading along the leads to the endocardium. The detection of isolated LRIE and the assessment of the spread of infection in a patient with PI is often difficult and requires complex imaging and microbiological tests. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the usefulness of new simple hematological parameters in detecting infectious complications in patients with CIED, differentiating vegetation and vegetation-like masses, and assessing the extent of infections in patients with PI.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 2909 patients (36.37% with CIED-related infections), undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures in three high-volume centres in the years 2006-2020, was conducted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), and lymphocyte-to-platelet ratio (LPR) in the diagnosis of CIED infections, evaluate the spread of the infectious process in patients with PI and differentiate additional structures related to the presence of lead.
RESULTS RESULTS
The values of NLR and NPR were significantly higher in infectious patients than non-infectious controls (3.07 vs. 2.59;
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Novel hematological markers (NLR and NPR) are characterized by high specificity in the initial diagnosis of CIED infections, with optimal cut-off values of 3.06 and 0.02. NLR is also useful in the assessment of the spread of infection in patients with PI, with a calculated optimal cut-off value of 3.13. NPR may be helpful in the differentiation of vegetation and vegetation-like masses with an optimal cut-off value of 0.03.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38068550
pii: jcm12237498
doi: 10.3390/jcm12237498
pmc: PMC10707215
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Oct 18;:
pubmed: 37851461
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Feb;70(2):325-59
pubmed: 25355810
J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Dec;18(12):599-601
pubmed: 17197710
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Apr 9;167(7):669-75
pubmed: 17420425
J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 Sep;23(5):617-23
pubmed: 25799712
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 6;11(17):e025600
pubmed: 36000421
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 4;9(1):9646
pubmed: 31273274
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Dec 19;9(12):
pubmed: 36547464
Infection. 2017 Jun;45(3):299-307
pubmed: 27995553
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Jun;34(6):679-83
pubmed: 21303389
Europace. 2012 Jul;14(7):994-1001
pubmed: 22247274
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2017 Sep 29;127(9):597-607
pubmed: 28724879
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Mar;74(3):238-246
pubmed: 32471719
Egypt Heart J. 2019 Sep 18;71(1):13
pubmed: 31659520
Europace. 2012 Jun;14(6):903-10
pubmed: 22310151
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;33(9):1601-8
pubmed: 24791953
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(1):11-16
pubmed: 31280549
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Sep;44(9):1233-1242
pubmed: 34302377
Europace. 2020 Jul 1;22(7):1062-1070
pubmed: 32390046
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Apr;25(4):521-5
pubmed: 25341467
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5575-81
pubmed: 25987782
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 1;41(21):2012-2032
pubmed: 32101604
Int Surg. 2012 Oct-Dec;97(4):299-304
pubmed: 23294069
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2019 Jun;20(6):372-378
pubmed: 30950985
J Clin Pathol. 2004 Sep;57(9):950-5
pubmed: 15333656
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jul;24(7):803-7
pubmed: 21493040
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016;14(5):573-7
pubmed: 26878164
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Jan;20(1):19-22
pubmed: 24639310
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;6(10):1075-1086
pubmed: 24011775
Europace. 2009 Nov;11(11):1510-6
pubmed: 19684037
Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R192
pubmed: 21034463
Ann Lab Med. 2013 Mar;33(2):105-10
pubmed: 23482854
Mediators Inflamm. 2020 Nov 27;2020:8586418
pubmed: 33354163

Auteurs

Maciej Polewczyk (M)

Institute of Medical Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.
Department of Acute Cardiac Care, Świetokrzyskie Cardiology Center, 25-736 Kielce, Poland.

Wojciech Jacheć (W)

2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.

Dorota Szczęśniak-Stańczyk (D)

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.

Anna Polewczyk (A)

Institute of Medical Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Świetokrzyskie Cardiology Center, 25-736 Kielce, Poland.

Andrzej Tomaszewski (A)

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.

Wojciech Brzozowski (W)

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.

Dorota Nowosielecka (D)

Department of Cardiology, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamość, Poland.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamość, Poland.

Andrzej Kutarski (A)

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.

Classifications MeSH