A 2-Year Outcomes and Complications of Various Techniques of Lumbar Discectomy: A Multicentric Prospective Study.

destandau’s technique endoscopic interlaminar discectomy lumbar discectomy microdiscectomy microtubular microdiscectomy multicentric study open discectomy oswestry disability index visual analogue score

Journal

Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 10 12 2023
pubmed: 10 12 2023
entrez: 9 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Prospective Study. There are numerous techniques for performing lumbar discectomy, each with its own rationale and stated benefits. The authors set out to evaluate and compare the perioperative variables, results, and complications of each treatment in a group of patients provided by ten hospitals and operated on by experienced surgeons. This prospective study comprised of 591 patients operated between February-2017 to February-2019. The procedures included open discectomy, microdiscectomy, tubular microdiscectomy, interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy, transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and Destandau techniques with a follow-up of minimum 2 years. VAS (Visual Analogue Score) for back and leg pain, ODI (Oswestry Disability Index), duration of surgery, hospital stay, length of scar, operative blood loss and peri-operative complications were recorded in each group. Post-operatively, there was a significant improvement in the VAS score for back pain as well as leg pain, and ODI scores spanning all groups, with no significant distinction amongst them. When compared to open procedures (open discectomy and microdiscectomy), minimally invasive surgeries (tubular discectomy, interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy, transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, and Destandau techniques) reported shorter operative time, duration of hospital stays, better cosmesis, and lower blood loss. Overall, the complication rate was reported to be 8.62%. Complication rates differed slightly across approaches. Minimally invasive surgeries have citable advantages over open approaches in terms of perioperative variables. However, all approaches are successful and provide comparable pain relief with similar functional outcomes at long term follow up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38069636
doi: 10.1177/21925682231220042
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

21925682231220042

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Praveen Goparaju (P)

Department of Orthopaedics, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Pritem A Rajamani (PA)

Department of Orthopaedics, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Arvind G Kulkarni (AG)

Department of Orthopaedics, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Mumbai Spine, Scoliosis and Disc Replacement Centre, Mumbai, India.

Priyambada Kumar (P)

Department of Orthopaedics, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Yogesh M Adbalwad (YM)

Department of Orthopaedics, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Shekhar Bhojraj (S)

P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Abhay Nene (A)

P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

S Rajasekaran (S)

Department of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India.

Shankar Acharya (S)

Department of Spine Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Arun Bhanot (A)

Department of Spine Services, Columbia Asian Hospital, Gurugram, India.

Pramod Lokhande (P)

Department of Orthopaedics, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, India.

Priyank Patel (P)

Department of Orthopaedics, Jupiter Hospital, Thane, India.

Paresh Chandra Dey (P)

Modern Orthopedic Clinic, Bhubaneshwar, India.

Harvinder Singh Chhabra (HS)

Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, India.

Achimuthu Rajamani (A)

Preetams Spine Surgery Centre, Madurai, India.

Bharat Rajendraprasad Dave (B)

Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, India.
Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Ajay Krishnan (A)

Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Classifications MeSH