Fluid suppression in amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) CEST imaging: New theoretical insights and clinical benefits.
APTw CEST imaging
MTRasym
fluid suppression
post-processing
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Dec 2023
10 Dec 2023
Historique:
revised:
17
10
2023
received:
07
06
2023
accepted:
18
10
2023
medline:
11
12
2023
pubmed:
11
12
2023
entrez:
11
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI at 3T provides a unique contrast for brain tumor imaging. However, APTw imaging suffers from hyperintensities in liquid compartments such as cystic or necrotic structures and provides a distorted APTw signal intensity. Recently, it has been shown that heuristically motivated fluid suppression can remove such artifacts and significantly improve the readability of APTw imaging. In this work, we show that the fluid suppression can actually be understood by the known concept of spillover dilution, which itself can be derived from the Bloch-McConnell equations in comparison to the heuristic approach. Therefore, we derive a novel post-processing formula that efficiently removes fluid artifact, and explains previous approaches. We demonstrate the utility of this APTw assessment in silico, in vitro, and in vivo in brain tumor patients acquired at MR scanners from different vendors. Our results show a reduction of the CEST signals from fluid environments while keeping the APTw-CEST signal intensity almost unchanged for semi-solid tissue structures such as the contralateral normal appearing white matter. This further allows us to use the same color bar settings as for conventional APTw imaging. Fluid suppression has considerable value in improving the readability of APTw maps in the neuro-oncological field. In this work, we derive a novel post-processing formula from the underlying Bloch-McConnell equations that efficiently removes fluid artifact, and explains previous approaches which justify the derivation of this metric from a theoretical point of view, to reassure the scientific and medical field about its use.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : ZA 814/5-1
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : ZA 814/7-1
Organisme : Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
Zhou J, Payen JF, Wilson DA, Traystman RJ, van Zijl PCM. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nat Med. 2003;9:1085-1090. doi:10.1038/nm907
Zhou J, Zaiss M, Knutsson L, et al. Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: application to brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88:546-574. doi:10.1002/mrm.29241
Sotirios B, Demetriou E, Topriceanu CC, Zakrzewska Z. The role of APT imaging in gliomas grading: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2020;133:109353. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109353
Nichelli L, Casagranda S. Current emerging MRI tools for radionecrosis and pseudoprogression diagnosis. Curr Opin Oncol. 2021;33:597-607. doi:10.1097/CCO.0000000000000793
Sartoretti E, Sartoretti T, Wyss M, et al. Amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging based radiomics allows for the differentiation of gliomas from metastases. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5506. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85168-8
Lingl JP, Wunderlich A, Goerke S, et al. The value of APTw CEST MRI in routine clinical assessment of human brain tumor patients at 3T. Diagnostics. 2022;12:490. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020490
Keupp J TO. Magnetization Transfer Ratio based Metric for APTw or CESTw MRI Suppressing Signal from Fluid Compartments-Initial Application to Glioblastoma Assessment. https://archive.ismrm.org/2018/3156.html. Published June 16, 2018. Accessed February 28, 2023. https://cds.ismrm.org/protected/18MProceedings/PDFfiles/3156.html.
Mancini L, Casagranda S, Gautier G, et al. CEST MRI provides amide/amine surrogate biomarkers for treatment-naïve glioma sub-typing. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:2377-2391. doi:10.1007/s00259-022-05676-1
Casagranda S, Mancini L, Gautier G, et al. Fluid suppression in CEST imaging affects predominantly IDH-mutant 1p/19q retained gliomas with T2-FLAIR mismatch. 2020. Accessed February 28, 2023. https://hal.science/hal-03241436.
Nichelli L. (ISMRM 2022) Predicting radionecrosis and recurrent disease through Amide Proton Transfer weighted imaging in brain metastases ISMRM 2022. Accessed May 24, 2023. https://archive.ismrm.org/2022/0126.html.
Spencer RGS, Horska A, Ferretti JA, Weiss GH. Spillover and incomplete saturation in kinetic measurements. J Magn Reson B. 1993;101:294-296. doi:10.1006/jmrb.1993.1045
Horská A, Spencer GS. Correctly accounting for radiofrequency spillover in saturation transfer experiments: application to measurement of the creatine kinase reaction rate in human forearm muscle. Magma. 1997;5:159-163. doi:10.1007/BF02592247
Baguet E, Roby C. Off-resonance irradiation effect in steady-state NMR saturation transfer. J Magn Reson. 1997;128:149-160. doi:10.1006/jmre.1997.1230
Sun PZ, van Zijl PCM, Zhou J. Optimization of the irradiation power in chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer experiments. J Magn Reson. 2005;175:193-200. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2005.04.005
Sun PZ, Zhou J, Huang J, van Zijl P. Simplified quantitative description of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging during acute ischemia. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57:405-410. doi:10.1002/mrm.21151
Sun PZ, Sorensen AG. Imaging pH using the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI: correction of concomitant RF irradiation effects to quantify CEST MRI for chemical exchange rate and pH. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:390-397. doi:10.1002/mrm.21653
Zaiss M, Xu J, Goerke S, et al. Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for spillover-, MT-, and T1-corrected steady-state pulsed CEST-MRI-application to pH-weighted MRI of acute stroke. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:240-252. doi:10.1002/nbm.3054
Zaiss M, Windschuh J, Goerke S, et al. Downfield-NOE-suppressed amide-CEST-MRI at 7 tesla provides a unique contrast in human glioblastoma. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77:196-208. doi:10.1002/mrm.26100
Goerke S, Soehngen Y, Deshmane A, et al. Relaxation-compensated APT and rNOE CEST-MRI of human brain tumors at 3 T. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82:622-632. doi:10.1002/mrm.27751
McConnell HM. Reaction rates by nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys. 1958;28:430-431. doi:10.1063/1.1744152
Jin T, Autio J, Obata T, Kim SG. Spin-locking versus chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI for investigating chemical exchange process between water and labile metaboliteprotons. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:1448-1460. doi:10.1002/mrm.22721
Zaiss M, Zu Z, Xu J, et al. A combined analytical solution for chemical exchange saturation transfer and semi-solid magnetization transfer. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:217-230. doi:10.1002/nbm.3237
Zaiss M, Angelovski G, Demetriou E, McMahon MT, Golay X, Scheffler K. QUESP and QUEST revisited-fast and accurate quantitative CEST experiments. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:1708-1721. doi:10.1002/mrm.26813
Sun PZ, Wang Y, Dai Z, Xiao G, Wu R. Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer (qCEST) MRI-RF spillover effect-corrected omega plot for simultaneous determination of labile proton fraction ratio and exchange rate. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2014;9:268-275. doi:10.1002/cmmi.1569
Zaiss M, Jin T, Kim SG, Gochberg DF. Theory of chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI in the context of different magnetic fields. NMR Biomed. 2022;35:e4789. doi:10.1002/nbm.4789
Herz K, Mueller S, Perlman O, et al. Pulseq-CEST: towards multi-site multi-vendor compatibility and reproducibility of CEST experiments using an open-source sequence standard. Magn Reson Med. 2021;86:1845-1858. doi:10.1002/mrm.28825
Sedykh M. Exchange Rate and Concentration Quantification by CEST MR Fingerprinting. Master's Thesis. Friedrich Alexander Universität; 2022.
Roberts NT, Hinshaw LA, Colgan TJ, Ii T, Hernando D, Reeder SB. B0 and B1 inhomogeneities in the liver at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85:2212-2220. doi:10.1002/mrm.28549
Stefano C, Papageorgakis S, Romdhane F, et al. Principal Component selections and filtering by spatial information criteria for multi-acquisition CEST MRI denoising. Proceedings of Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB & ISMRT 31st Annual Meeting; London. 2022. Abstract #2080.
Buckheit J, Chen S, Donoho D, Johnstone I, Scargle J. AboutWaveLab. 2005 https://statweb.stanford.edu/∼wavelab/Wavelab_850/AboutWaveLab.pdf
Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JPW. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:196-205. doi:10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616
Papageorgakis C, Firippi E, Gy B, et al. Fast WASABI post-processing: Access to rapid B0 and B1 correction in clinical routine for CEST MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2023.06.001
Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ, Graham SJ. Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review. NMR Biomed. 2001;14:57-64. doi:10.1002/nbm.683
Wang M, Hong X, Chang CF, et al. Simultaneous detection and separation of hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral ischemia using amide proton transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74:42-50. doi:10.1002/mrm.25690
Zaiss M, Bachert P. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR Z-spectroscopy in vivo: a review of theoretical approaches and methods. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:R221-R269. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/R221
Togao O, Keupp J, Yamashita K, Kikuchi K, Wada T, Ishigami K. Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI of brain tumors with fluid & solid compartment corrections using background magnetization transfer effects. https://submissions.mirasmart.com/ISMRM2023/ViewSubmissionFile.aspx?mode=video&validate=false&sbmID=1803. Published August 17, 2023. Accessed August 17, 2023. https://submissions.mirasmart.com/ISMRM2023/ViewSubmissionFile.aspx?mode=video&validate=false&sbmID=1803.