Adherence to Modern Contraceptives Among Female Refugee Adolescents in Northern Uganda: A Prospective Single Cohort Study.

adolescents contraceptive adherence contraceptive discontinuation refugees teenage pregnancy

Journal

Open access journal of contraception
ISSN: 1179-1527
Titre abrégé: Open Access J Contracept
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101700100

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 15 07 2023
accepted: 18 11 2023
medline: 11 12 2023
pubmed: 11 12 2023
entrez: 11 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Contraceptive adherence is the current and consistent use of a contraceptive method as prescribed by a health worker or family planning provider so as to prevent pregnancy. Globally, adherence is lowest among adolescents. This has greatly contributed to the high burden of adolescent pregnancies. Adherence and reasons for discontinuation among refugee adolescents are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the rates and predictors of adherence to modern contraceptives among female refugee adolescents in northern Uganda. This was a prospective single cohort study, nested into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of peer counselling on acceptance of modern contraceptives. The RCT was conducted among female refugee adolescents in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda. The study involved 272 new starters of modern contraceptives who were followed up for six months from May 2019 to January 2020. The outcome was measured at one, three, and six months after receiving a contraceptive method, and the predictors of adherence were determined using Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). Data were analysed using STATA version 14.0. Adherence rates were low and reduced over time. By the end of the six months, only 44% of the participants were using a contraceptive method. Participants using long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) were more likely to adhere compared to those who were using short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARC) (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.914-5.937, Adherence to modern contraceptives was low, leaving adolescents at risk of unintended pregnancies. Participants using LARC were more likely to adhere than those using SARC. Interventions addressing fear of side effects and partner prohibition should be studied and implemented to enable adherence to modern contraceptives.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Contraceptive adherence is the current and consistent use of a contraceptive method as prescribed by a health worker or family planning provider so as to prevent pregnancy. Globally, adherence is lowest among adolescents. This has greatly contributed to the high burden of adolescent pregnancies. Adherence and reasons for discontinuation among refugee adolescents are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the rates and predictors of adherence to modern contraceptives among female refugee adolescents in northern Uganda.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This was a prospective single cohort study, nested into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of peer counselling on acceptance of modern contraceptives. The RCT was conducted among female refugee adolescents in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda. The study involved 272 new starters of modern contraceptives who were followed up for six months from May 2019 to January 2020. The outcome was measured at one, three, and six months after receiving a contraceptive method, and the predictors of adherence were determined using Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). Data were analysed using STATA version 14.0.
Results UNASSIGNED
Adherence rates were low and reduced over time. By the end of the six months, only 44% of the participants were using a contraceptive method. Participants using long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) were more likely to adhere compared to those who were using short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARC) (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.914-5.937,
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Adherence to modern contraceptives was low, leaving adolescents at risk of unintended pregnancies. Participants using LARC were more likely to adhere than those using SARC. Interventions addressing fear of side effects and partner prohibition should be studied and implemented to enable adherence to modern contraceptives.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38076392
doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S430813
pii: 430813
pmc: PMC10700036
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

169-180

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Bakesiima et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Professor Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson reports personal fees from Organon7MsD, Bayer, Gedeon Richter, Mithra, Natural Cycles, MedinCell, ObsEva, and Cirqle, outside the submitted work. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests for this work.

Références

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Dec;29(6):659-667
pubmed: 27386754
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):363-371
pubmed: 21252751
Stud Fam Plann. 2002 Jun;33(2):127-40
pubmed: 12132634
Reprod Health. 2020 May 20;17(1):67
pubmed: 32434523
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Oct 17;147:w14504
pubmed: 29039629
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256479
pubmed: 34473750
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 26;13(9):e0204327
pubmed: 30256821
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):510-516
pubmed: 30217474
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7
pubmed: 20541171
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;36(3):731-46
pubmed: 2660094
Drugs. 2011 May 28;71(8):969-80
pubmed: 21668037
J Adolesc Health Care. 1984 Jan;5(1):1-6
pubmed: 6693340
J Contracept Stud. 2016 Jan 26;1(1):
pubmed: 28317036
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Jun;35(2):63-71
pubmed: 19620090
Contraception. 2002 Aug;66(2):81-5
pubmed: 12204779
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017 Feb;30(1):53-57
pubmed: 27423766

Auteurs

Ritah Bakesiima (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson (K)

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
WHO Collaborating Centre, Division of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mulago Specialised Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.

Amanda Cleeve (A)

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
WHO Collaborating Centre, Division of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Women´s Health, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Elin C Larsson (EC)

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
WHO Collaborating Centre, Division of Women's Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Rose Chalo Nabirye (R)

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.

Classifications MeSH