Diclofenac for acute postoperative pain in children.
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Dec 2023
11 Dec 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
11
12
2024
medline:
11
12
2023
pubmed:
11
12
2023
entrez:
11
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many children undergo various surgeries, which often lead to acute postoperative pain. This pain influences recovery and quality of life. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), specifically cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors such as diclofenac, can be used to treat pain and reduce inflammation. There is uncertainty regarding diclofenac's benefits and harms compared to placebo or other drugs for postoperative pain. To assess the efficacy and safety of diclofenac (any dose) for acute postoperative pain management in children compared with placebo, other active comparators, or diclofenac administered by different routes (e.g. oral, rectal, etc.) or strategies (e.g. 'as needed' versus 'as scheduled'). We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and trial registries on 11 April 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children under 18 years of age undergoing surgery that compared diclofenac (delivered in any dose and route) to placebo or any active pharmacological intervention. We included RCTs comparing different administration routes of diclofenac and different strategies. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were: pain relief (PR) reported by the child, defined as the proportion of children reporting 50% or better postoperative pain relief; pain intensity (PI) reported by the child; adverse events (AEs); and serious adverse events (SAEs). We presented results using risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and standardised mean differences (SMD), with the associated confidence intervals (CI). We included 32 RCTs with 2250 children. All surgeries were done using general anaesthesia. Most studies (27) included children above age three. Only two studies had an overall low risk of bias; 30 had an unclear or high risk of bias in one or several domains. Diclofenac versus placebo (three studies) None of the included studies reported on PR or PI. We are very uncertain about the benefits and harms of diclofenac versus placebo on nausea/vomiting (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.80; 2 studies, 100 children) and any reported bleeding (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.34 to 26.45; 2 studies, 100 children), both very low-certainty evidence. None of the included studies reported SAEs. Diclofenac versus opioids (seven studies) We are very uncertain if diclofenac reduces PI at 2 to 24 hours postoperatively compared to opioids (median pain intensity 0.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.0 to 2.5) for diclofenac versus median 0.7 (IQR 0.1 to 2.4) in the opioid group; 1 study, 50 children; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported on PR or PI for other time points. Diclofenac probably results in less nausea/vomiting compared to opioids (41.0% in opioids, 31.0% in diclofenac; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96; 7 studies, 463 participants), and probably increases any reported bleeding (5.4% in opioids, 16.5% in diclofenac; RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.31 to 7.13; 2 studies, 222 participants), both moderate-certainty evidence. None of the included studies reported SAEs. Diclofenac versus paracetamol (10 studies) None of the included studies assessed child-reported PR. Compared to paracetamol, we are very uncertain if diclofenac: reduces PI at 0 to 2 hours postoperatively (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.15; 2 studies, 180 children); reduces PI at 2 to 24 hours postoperatively (SMD -0.64, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.39; 3 studies, 300 children); reduces nausea/vomiting (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.87; 5 studies, 348 children); reduces bleeding events (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.62; 5 studies, 332 participants); or reduces SAEs (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.22; 1 study, 60 children). The evidence certainty was very low for all outcomes. Diclofenac versus bupivacaine (five studies) None of the included studies reported on PR or PI. Compared to bupivacaine, we are very uncertain about the effect of diclofenac on nausea/vomiting (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.78; 3 studies, 128 children) and SAEs (RR 4.52, 95% CI 0.23 to 88.38; 1 study, 38 children), both very low-certainty evidence. Diclofenac versus active pharmacological comparator (10 studies) We are very uncertain about the benefits and harms of diclofenac versus any other active pharmacological comparator (dexamethasone, pranoprofen, fluorometholone, oxybuprocaine, flurbiprofen, lignocaine), and for different routes and delivery of diclofenac, due to few and small studies, no reporting of key outcomes, and very low-certainty evidence for the reported outcomes. We are unable to draw any meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. We remain uncertain about the efficacy of diclofenac compared to placebo, active comparators, or by different routes of administration, for postoperative pain management in children. This is largely due to authors not reporting on clinically important outcomes; unclear reporting of the trials; or poor trial conduct reducing our confidence in the results. We remain uncertain about diclofenac's safety compared to placebo or active comparators, except for the comparison of diclofenac with opioids: diclofenac probably results in less nausea and vomiting compared with opioids, but more bleeding events. For healthcare providers managing postoperative pain, diclofenac is a COX inhibitor option, along with other pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Healthcare providers should weigh the benefits and risks based on what is known of their respective pharmacological effects, rather than known efficacy. For surgical interventions in which bleeding or nausea and vomiting are a concern postoperatively, the risks of adverse events using opioids or diclofenac for managing pain should be considered.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Many children undergo various surgeries, which often lead to acute postoperative pain. This pain influences recovery and quality of life. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), specifically cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors such as diclofenac, can be used to treat pain and reduce inflammation. There is uncertainty regarding diclofenac's benefits and harms compared to placebo or other drugs for postoperative pain.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of diclofenac (any dose) for acute postoperative pain management in children compared with placebo, other active comparators, or diclofenac administered by different routes (e.g. oral, rectal, etc.) or strategies (e.g. 'as needed' versus 'as scheduled').
SEARCH METHODS
METHODS
We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and trial registries on 11 April 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
METHODS
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children under 18 years of age undergoing surgery that compared diclofenac (delivered in any dose and route) to placebo or any active pharmacological intervention. We included RCTs comparing different administration routes of diclofenac and different strategies.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
METHODS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were: pain relief (PR) reported by the child, defined as the proportion of children reporting 50% or better postoperative pain relief; pain intensity (PI) reported by the child; adverse events (AEs); and serious adverse events (SAEs). We presented results using risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and standardised mean differences (SMD), with the associated confidence intervals (CI).
MAIN RESULTS
RESULTS
We included 32 RCTs with 2250 children. All surgeries were done using general anaesthesia. Most studies (27) included children above age three. Only two studies had an overall low risk of bias; 30 had an unclear or high risk of bias in one or several domains. Diclofenac versus placebo (three studies) None of the included studies reported on PR or PI. We are very uncertain about the benefits and harms of diclofenac versus placebo on nausea/vomiting (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.80; 2 studies, 100 children) and any reported bleeding (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.34 to 26.45; 2 studies, 100 children), both very low-certainty evidence. None of the included studies reported SAEs. Diclofenac versus opioids (seven studies) We are very uncertain if diclofenac reduces PI at 2 to 24 hours postoperatively compared to opioids (median pain intensity 0.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.0 to 2.5) for diclofenac versus median 0.7 (IQR 0.1 to 2.4) in the opioid group; 1 study, 50 children; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported on PR or PI for other time points. Diclofenac probably results in less nausea/vomiting compared to opioids (41.0% in opioids, 31.0% in diclofenac; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96; 7 studies, 463 participants), and probably increases any reported bleeding (5.4% in opioids, 16.5% in diclofenac; RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.31 to 7.13; 2 studies, 222 participants), both moderate-certainty evidence. None of the included studies reported SAEs. Diclofenac versus paracetamol (10 studies) None of the included studies assessed child-reported PR. Compared to paracetamol, we are very uncertain if diclofenac: reduces PI at 0 to 2 hours postoperatively (SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.15; 2 studies, 180 children); reduces PI at 2 to 24 hours postoperatively (SMD -0.64, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.39; 3 studies, 300 children); reduces nausea/vomiting (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.87; 5 studies, 348 children); reduces bleeding events (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.62; 5 studies, 332 participants); or reduces SAEs (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.22; 1 study, 60 children). The evidence certainty was very low for all outcomes. Diclofenac versus bupivacaine (five studies) None of the included studies reported on PR or PI. Compared to bupivacaine, we are very uncertain about the effect of diclofenac on nausea/vomiting (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.78; 3 studies, 128 children) and SAEs (RR 4.52, 95% CI 0.23 to 88.38; 1 study, 38 children), both very low-certainty evidence. Diclofenac versus active pharmacological comparator (10 studies) We are very uncertain about the benefits and harms of diclofenac versus any other active pharmacological comparator (dexamethasone, pranoprofen, fluorometholone, oxybuprocaine, flurbiprofen, lignocaine), and for different routes and delivery of diclofenac, due to few and small studies, no reporting of key outcomes, and very low-certainty evidence for the reported outcomes. We are unable to draw any meaningful conclusions from the numerical results.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We remain uncertain about the efficacy of diclofenac compared to placebo, active comparators, or by different routes of administration, for postoperative pain management in children. This is largely due to authors not reporting on clinically important outcomes; unclear reporting of the trials; or poor trial conduct reducing our confidence in the results. We remain uncertain about diclofenac's safety compared to placebo or active comparators, except for the comparison of diclofenac with opioids: diclofenac probably results in less nausea and vomiting compared with opioids, but more bleeding events. For healthcare providers managing postoperative pain, diclofenac is a COX inhibitor option, along with other pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Healthcare providers should weigh the benefits and risks based on what is known of their respective pharmacological effects, rather than known efficacy. For surgical interventions in which bleeding or nausea and vomiting are a concern postoperatively, the risks of adverse events using opioids or diclofenac for managing pain should be considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38078559
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015087.pub2
pmc: PMC10712214
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD015087Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Références
Paediatr Anaesth. 2020 Oct;30(10):1083-1090
pubmed: 32777147
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Oct;27(10):851-7
pubmed: 20375902
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Mar;44(3):291-5
pubmed: 10714842
Anaesthesia. 1994 Jan;49(1):57-61
pubmed: 7906104
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Oct;77(10):1998-2003
pubmed: 31077671
Ophthalmology. 2000 Oct;107(10):1884-8
pubmed: 11013193
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Apr;74(4):374-7
pubmed: 20129679
BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):343-5
pubmed: 9487167
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;34(7):550-554
pubmed: 29782196
Anaesthesia. 1995 Sep;50(9):820-2
pubmed: 7573879
Anesthesiology. 2003 Jun;98(6):1497-502
pubmed: 12766664
Refract Corneal Surg. 1993 Nov-Dec;9(6):425-36
pubmed: 8117641
PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001388
pubmed: 23424288
Pain Med. 2017 May 1;18(5):947-958
pubmed: 28482098
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Oct;129(10):1086-9
pubmed: 14568792
BMJ. 2018 Sep 4;362:k3426
pubmed: 30181258
Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):143-57
pubmed: 16777328
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Gut. 2002 May;50 Suppl 3:III25-30
pubmed: 11953329
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1980 Nov-Dec;5(6):485-527
pubmed: 7002417
Paediatr Anaesth. 1998;8(5):403-7
pubmed: 9742535
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Dec;9(4):602-614
pubmed: 29314757
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:130-139
pubmed: 33476769
Am J Med. 1986 Apr 28;80(4B):70-80
pubmed: 3706353
Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):5-18
pubmed: 30180088
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Feb;88(2):227-33
pubmed: 11883386
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Jun;28(6):493-506
pubmed: 29635764
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 9;345(6):433-42
pubmed: 11496855
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1709-11
pubmed: 15470192
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):301-4
pubmed: 27212765
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1996 Jul;13(4):359-63
pubmed: 8842656
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2004 Jan-Feb;(1):54-7
pubmed: 15206315
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Sep;27(9):893-904
pubmed: 28707454
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Nov;9(16):2921-9
pubmed: 18937623
Paediatr Anaesth. 1997;7(3):221-6
pubmed: 9189968
Anaesthesia. 1990 Feb;45(2):156-8
pubmed: 2321721
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Sep;87(3):400-5
pubmed: 11517123
Indian J Anaesth. 2012 May;56(3):265-9
pubmed: 22923826
Anaesthesia. 1993 Feb;48(2):132-5
pubmed: 8460760
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):22-35
pubmed: 24602421
Clin Ther. 2014 Jun 1;36(6):906-17
pubmed: 24863260
J Anesth. 2020 Jun;34(3):421-433
pubmed: 32236681
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Jan;44(1):118-24
pubmed: 10669283
Drugs. 1988 Mar;35(3):244-85
pubmed: 3286213
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Apr;46(4):430-4
pubmed: 11952445
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Oct;32(10):725-34
pubmed: 26241763
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:142-150
pubmed: 32798713
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Apr;127(4):385-8
pubmed: 11296045
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jan;55(1):51-61
pubmed: 12534640
Anaesthesia. 1988 Apr;43(4):277-80
pubmed: 3377147
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 02;(7):CD005538
pubmed: 26134060
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Sep;52(9):1384-1388
pubmed: 28535959
Acta Otolaryngol. 1984 Jul-Aug;98(1-2):185-92
pubmed: 6380210
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2002 Apr;52(2):175-84
pubmed: 19475212
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 07;7:CD012294
pubmed: 29981164
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:140-151
pubmed: 33171275
Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Mar;21(3):316-24
pubmed: 21276131
Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Jun;14(6):443-51
pubmed: 15153204
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Oct;45(10):1940-6
pubmed: 20920710
J Pain Res. 2010 Jul 15;3:105-23
pubmed: 21197314
Anesthesiology. 2005 Dec;103(6):1225-32
pubmed: 16306736
Paediatr Anaesth. 2001 Jul;11(4):431-6
pubmed: 11442860
Trop Doct. 2005 Jul;35(3):136-9
pubmed: 16105333
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 3;3:CD014876
pubmed: 36870076
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):136-43
pubmed: 22023485
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Feb;16(1):35-41
pubmed: 25260983
Minerva Anestesiol. 1984 Jul-Aug;50(7-8):373-8
pubmed: 6395037
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Sep;22(5):1955-9
pubmed: 21959480
Br J Anaesth. 1999 May;82(5):715-7
pubmed: 10536549
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Feb;30(1):55-9
pubmed: 11939442
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Oct;62:36-43
pubmed: 27450664
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005 Aug;15(4):415-8
pubmed: 16108749
Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10(6):645-51
pubmed: 11119198
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Sep;24(9):953-61
pubmed: 24815417
N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 18;349(12):1157-67
pubmed: 13679531
Anaesthesia. 1988 Aug;43(8):641-3
pubmed: 3421455
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;21(3):321-326
pubmed: 28597117
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 28;8:CD012498
pubmed: 30153336
Niger J Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;9(2):102-4
pubmed: 17319338
Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(2):103-23
pubmed: 12529163
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jun;23(3):280-3
pubmed: 17593012
Minerva Anestesiol. 1999 Oct;65(10):741-5
pubmed: 10598433
Am J Med. 1986 Apr 28;80(4B):29-33
pubmed: 3085489
Anaesthesia. 1999 Mar;54(3):298-9
pubmed: 10364873
Anaesthesia. 1997 Jul;52(7):673-83
pubmed: 9244028
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 Jan;39(1):96-9
pubmed: 7725890
CMAJ. 2020 Aug 10;192(32):E901-E906
pubmed: 32778601
Anaesthesia. 2007 Dec;62(12):1241-5
pubmed: 17991260
Anaesthesia. 1992 Dec;47(12):1078-80
pubmed: 1489038
Minerva Stomatol. 1992 Dec;41(12):567-76
pubmed: 1301491
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1980 May;35(5):559-63
pubmed: 7004845
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Mar;88(3):412-8
pubmed: 15962653
BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 5;22(1):252
pubmed: 35513880
Anaesthesia. 2011 Oct;66(10):919-24
pubmed: 21883125
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1994 Jun;35(3):219-28
pubmed: 8040170