Comparison of circulating tumor DNA assays for Molecular Residual Disease detection in early-stage triple negative breast cancer.
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Dec 2023
11 Dec 2023
Historique:
accepted:
06
12
2023
received:
11
08
2023
revised:
16
10
2023
medline:
11
12
2023
pubmed:
11
12
2023
entrez:
11
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients who have completed treatment for early-stage breast cancer is associated with a high risk of relapse, yet the optimal assay for ctDNA detection is unknown. The cTRAK-TN clinical trial prospectively used tumor informed digital PCR (dPCR) assays for ctDNA molecular residual disease (MRD) detection in early-stage triple negative breast cancer. We compared tumor informed dPCR assays with tumor informed personalized multi-mutation sequencing assays in 141 patients from cTRAK-TN. MRD was first detected by personalized sequencing in 47.9% of patients, 0% first detected by dPCR, and 52.1% with both assays simultaneously (p<0.001, Fisher's exact test). The median lead time from ctDNA detection to relapse was 6.1 months with personalized sequencing and 3.9 months with dPCR (p=0.004, mixed effects Cox model). Detection of MRD at the first timepoint was associated with a shorter time to relapse compared with detection at subsequent timepoints (median lead time 4.2 vs 7.1 months, p=0.02). Personalized multi-mutation sequencing assays have potential clinically important improvements in clinical outcome in the early detection of MRD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38078899
pii: 731689
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2326
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM