Integrated Exposure-Response of Dupilumab in Children, Adolescents, and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis Using Categorical and Continuous Efficacy Assessments: A Population Analysis.

atopic dermatitis dupilumab exposure–response pediatrics

Journal

Pharmaceutical research
ISSN: 1573-904X
Titre abrégé: Pharm Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8406521

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 31 05 2023
accepted: 27 09 2023
medline: 12 12 2023
pubmed: 12 12 2023
entrez: 11 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

While the majority of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) achieve disease control with dupilumab treatment, there is variability in which patients achieve clear disease. The predictors of these responses are currently unclear. Integrated models were developed to evaluate the exposure-response (E-R) relationship of dupilumab in children, adolescents, and adults with AD. Data from six Phase II and III clinical studies were pooled (2,366 adults [> 18 years], 243 adolescents [≥ 12 to < 18 years] and 359 children [≥ 6 to < 12 years]) for model development. Efficacy was assessed using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). Indirect response models were applied to link measures of efficacy and functional serum dupilumab concentrations. The covariates on individual placebo-corrected response were assessed. Clinical trial scenarios were simulated to compare E-R relationships across age groups. Safety was not explored. After correcting for differences in placebo response and dupilumab exposure: 1) older age, higher body weight, lower baseline thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, and Asian race were associated with slightly lower EASI response, and no clear covariates were identified on IGA response; 2) clinical trial simulations generally showed slightly higher response at a given dupilumab concentration in children compared to adults and adolescents with severe and moderate AD. The collectively tested covariates explain some of the variability in dupilumab response in patients with AD. Patients in all age groups showed adequate response to dupilumab; however, children showed slightly higher drug effects compared to adults and adolescents at equivalent concentrations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While the majority of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) achieve disease control with dupilumab treatment, there is variability in which patients achieve clear disease. The predictors of these responses are currently unclear. Integrated models were developed to evaluate the exposure-response (E-R) relationship of dupilumab in children, adolescents, and adults with AD.
METHODS METHODS
Data from six Phase II and III clinical studies were pooled (2,366 adults [> 18 years], 243 adolescents [≥ 12 to < 18 years] and 359 children [≥ 6 to < 12 years]) for model development. Efficacy was assessed using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA). Indirect response models were applied to link measures of efficacy and functional serum dupilumab concentrations. The covariates on individual placebo-corrected response were assessed. Clinical trial scenarios were simulated to compare E-R relationships across age groups. Safety was not explored.
RESULTS RESULTS
After correcting for differences in placebo response and dupilumab exposure: 1) older age, higher body weight, lower baseline thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, and Asian race were associated with slightly lower EASI response, and no clear covariates were identified on IGA response; 2) clinical trial simulations generally showed slightly higher response at a given dupilumab concentration in children compared to adults and adolescents with severe and moderate AD.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The collectively tested covariates explain some of the variability in dupilumab response in patients with AD. Patients in all age groups showed adequate response to dupilumab; however, children showed slightly higher drug effects compared to adults and adolescents at equivalent concentrations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38082089
doi: 10.1007/s11095-023-03616-8
pii: 10.1007/s11095-023-03616-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Laughter MR, Maymone MBC, Mashayekhi S, Arents BWM, Karimkhani C, Langan SM, et al. The global burden of atopic dermatitis: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2017. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(2):304–9.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.19580 pubmed: 33006135
Kowalska-Olędzka E, Czarnecka M, Baran A. Comparison of treatment standards in atopic dermatitis management across selected geographies prior to emerging targeted therapies onset. J Drug Assess. 2019;8(1):122–5.
doi: 10.1080/21556660.2019.1619569 pubmed: 31231591 pmcid: 6567042
Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, Krol A, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies  [published online ahead of print, 2023 Jan 12]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):116–32.
Sidbury R, Davis DM, Cohen DE, Cordoro KM, Berger TG, Bergman JN, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(2):327–49.
Sidbury R, Alikhan A, Bercovitch L, Cohen DE, Darr JM, Drucker AM, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2022.12.029 .
Boguniewicz M, Alexis AF, Beck LA, Block J, Eichenfield LF, Fonacier L, et al. Expert perspectives on management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a multidisciplinary consensus addressing current and emerging therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(6):1519–31.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.005 pubmed: 28970084
DUPIXENT (dupilumab). Highlights of Prescribing Information. FDA, Updated October 2022. https://www.regeneron.com/downloads/dupixent_fpi.pdf . Accessed 18 Mar 2023.
Macdonald LE, Karow M, Stevens S, Auerbach W, Poueymirou WT, Yasenchak J, et al. Precise and in situ genetic humanization of 6 Mb of mouse immunoglobulin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(14):5147–52.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323896111 pubmed: 24706858 pmcid: 3986150
Murphy AJ, Macdonald LE, Stevens S, Karow M, Dore AT, Pobursky K, et al. Mice with megabase humanization of their immunoglobulin genes generate antibodies as efficiently as normal mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(14):5153–8.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324022111 pubmed: 24706856 pmcid: 3986188
Le Floc’h A, Allinne J, Nagashima K, Scott G, Birchard D, Asrat S, et al. Dual blockade of IL-4 and IL-13 with dupilumab, an IL-4Rα antibody, is required to broadly inhibit type 2 inflammation. Allergy. 2020;75(5):1188–204.
doi: 10.1111/all.14151 pubmed: 31838750
Paller AS, Siegfried EC, Thaçi D, Wollenberg A, Cork MJ, Arkwright PD, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids in children 6 to 11 years old with severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(5):1282–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.054 pubmed: 32574587
Simpson EL, Paller AS, Siegfried EC, Boguniewicz M, Sher L, Gooderham MJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adolescents with uncontrolled moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(1):44–56.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.3336 pubmed: 31693077
Thaçi D, Simpson EL, Beck LA, Bieber T, Blauvelt A, Papp K, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical treatments: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):40–52.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00388-8 pubmed: 26454361
Simpson EL, Bieber T, Guttman-Yassky E, Beck LA, Blauvelt A, Cork MJ, et al. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(24):2335–48.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610020 pubmed: 27690741
Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Gooderham M, Cather JC, Weisman J, Pariser D, et al. Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2287–303.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31191-1 pubmed: 28478972
Castro M, Corren J, Pavord ID, Maspero J, Wenzel S, Rabe KF, et al. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2486–96.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804092 pubmed: 29782217
Rabe KF, Nair P, Brusselle G, Maspero JF, Castro M, Sher L, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in glucocorticoid-dependent severe asthma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2475–85.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804093 pubmed: 29782224
Bacharier LB, Maspero JF, Katelaris CH, Fiocchi AG, Gagnon R, de Mir I, et al. Dupilumab in children with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(24):2230–40.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2106567 pubmed: 34879449
Bachert C, Han JK, Desrosiers M, Hellings PW, Amin N, Lee SE, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2019;394(10209):1638–50.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31881-1 pubmed: 31543428
Dellon ES, Rothenberg ME, Collins MH, Hirano I, Chehade M, Bredenoord A, et al. Dupilumab in adults and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(25):2317–30.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2205982 pubmed: 36546624
Yosipovitch G, Mollanazar N, Ständer S, Kwatra SG, Kim BS, Laws E, et al. Dupilumab in patients with prurigo nodularis: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials [published online ahead of print, 2023 May 4]. Nat Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02320-9 .
Kamal MA, Kovalenko P, Kosloski MP, Srinivasan K, Zhang Y, Rajadhyaksha M, et al. The posology of dupilumab in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;110(5):1318–28.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2366 pubmed: 34270797 pmcid: 9290854
Davis JD, Bansal A, Hassman D, Akinlade B, Li M, Li Z, et al. Evaluation of potential disease-mediated drug-drug interaction in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis receiving dupilumab. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104(6):1146–54.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.1058 pubmed: 29498038 pmcid: 6282936
Kovalenko P, DiCioccio AT, Davis JD, Li M, Ardeleanu M, Graham N, et al. Exploratory population PK analysis of dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against IL-4Rα, in atopic dermatitis patients and normal volunteers. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016;5(11):617–24.
doi: 10.1002/psp4.12136 pubmed: 27778477 pmcid: 5655850
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Approval package for dupixent (dupilumab). Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2022/761055Orig1s012.pdf . Accessed 11 May 2023.
BLA multi-disciplinary review and evaluation of dupixent (dupilumab). Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/139657/download . Accessed 10 May 2023.
Beal S, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann A, Bauer RJ. NONMEM User's Guides. (1989–2016). Ellicott City: Icon Development Solutions; 2016.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/ . Accessed 13 Oct 2023.
Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects model. AAPS J. 2011;13(2):143–51.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9255-z pubmed: 21302010 pmcid: 3085712
Brunner PM, Guttman-Yassky E. Racial differences in atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;122(5):449–55.
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.11.015 pubmed: 30465859
Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol. 2010;22(2):125–37.
doi: 10.5021/ad.2010.22.2.125 pubmed: 20548901 pmcid: 2883413
Ständer S. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(12):1136–43.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2023911 pubmed: 33761208
Yew YW, Thyssen JP, Silverberg JI. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the regional and age-related differences in atopic dermatitis clinical characteristics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(2):390–401.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.035 pubmed: 30287309
Renert-Yuval Y, Del Duca E, Pavel AB, Fang M, Lefferdink R, Wu J, et al. The molecular features of normal and atopic dermatitis skin in infants, children, adolescents, and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(1):148–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.001 pubmed: 33453290 pmcid: 9285652
Czarnowicki T, Esaki H, Gonzalez J, Malajian D, Shemer A, Noda S, et al. Early pediatric atopic dermatitis shows only a cutaneous lymphocyte antigen (CLA)(+) TH2/TH1 cell imbalance, whereas adults acquire CLA(+) TH22/TC22 cell subsets. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(4):941-951.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.05.049 pubmed: 26242300 pmcid: 4946641
Brunner PM, Israel A, Leonard A, Pavel AB, Kim HJ, Zhang N, et al. Distinct transcriptomic profiles of early-onset atopic dermatitis in blood and skin of pediatric patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;122(3):318-30.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.11.025 pubmed: 30508584
US Food and Drug Industry. Clinical Pharmacology Considerations for Pediatric Studies of Drugs, Including Biological Products. 2022. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/general-clinical-pharmacology-considerations-pediatric-studies-drugs-including-biological-products . Accessed 13 Oct 2023.
International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Guideline: Pediatric Extrapolation E11A. 2022. https://www.fda.gov/media/161190/download . Accessed 13 Oct 2023.

Auteurs

Emily Briggs (E)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
A2-Ai, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Mohamed A Kamal (MA)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA. Mohamed.kamal@regeneron.com.

Matthew P Kosloski (MP)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Ian Linsmeier (I)

Arcus Biosciences, Hayward, CA, USA.

Natalie Jusko (N)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amador Bioscience, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Nancy Dolphin (N)

Amador Bioscience, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Jason Chittenden (J)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Eric L Simpson (EL)

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Amy S Paller (AS)

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.

Elaine C Siegfried (EC)

Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Brad Shumel (B)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Noah A Levit (NA)

Dermatology Physicians of Connecticut, Fairfield, CT, USA.

Ashish Bansal (A)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.

John D Davis (JD)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Sunny Chapel (S)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

David E Smith (DE)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Nidal Huniti (N)

Amador Bioscience, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Classifications MeSH