Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of amustaline/glutathione pathogen-reduced RBCs in complex cardiac surgery: the Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation (ReCePI) study-protocol for a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial.
Acute kidney injury
Amustaline/GSH
Cardiac surgery
INTERCEPT
Pathogen reduction
Randomized controlled trial
Transfusion-transmitted infections
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Dec 2023
11 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
19
09
2023
accepted:
24
11
2023
medline:
12
12
2023
pubmed:
12
12
2023
entrez:
12
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leukocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen-reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies. ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-design, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from pre-surgery baseline within 48 ± 4 h of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen-reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥ 292 evaluable, transfused patients (> 146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%. RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen-reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBCs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leukocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen-reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies.
METHODS
METHODS
ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-design, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from pre-surgery baseline within 48 ± 4 h of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen-reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥ 292 evaluable, transfused patients (> 146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen-reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBCs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38082326
doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07831-x
pii: 10.1186/s13063-023-07831-x
pmc: PMC10712151
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
799Subventions
Organisme : Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
ID : HHS010020160009c
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Transfusion. 2006 Jul;46(7):1120-9
pubmed: 16836558
Transfusion. 2016 Mar;56 Suppl 1:S29-38
pubmed: 27001358
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 9;372(15):1419-29
pubmed: 25853746
Transfus Med Rev. 2019 Jul;33(3):146-153
pubmed: 31327668
Anesth Analg. 2005 May;100(5):1433-1458
pubmed: 15845701
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1129-37
pubmed: 18379238
Transfusion. 2018 Apr;58(4):905-916
pubmed: 29498049
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD002042
pubmed: 22513904
N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):409-17
pubmed: 9971864
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Jun;15(6):1597-605
pubmed: 15153571
Transfusion. 2017 Dec;57(12):2946-2957
pubmed: 28840603
Vox Sang. 2015 Nov;109(4):343-52
pubmed: 25981525
Blood. 2015 Jul 16;126(3):406-14
pubmed: 25931584
JAMA. 2012 Oct 10;308(14):1443-51
pubmed: 23045213
Anesth Analg. 2022 Oct 1;135(4):744-756
pubmed: 35544772
Transfus Med Rev. 2019 Apr;33(2):84-91
pubmed: 30930009
ISBT Sci Ser. 2014 Jul;9(1):30-36
pubmed: 25210533
Br J Haematol. 2019 Aug;186(4):625-636
pubmed: 31148155
BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586
pubmed: 23303884
Vox Sang. 2017 Apr;112(3):210-218
pubmed: 28220519
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 9;372(15):1410-8
pubmed: 25853745
Transfus Med Hemother. 2011;38(1):33-42
pubmed: 21779204
Transfusion. 2020 Oct;60(10):2389-2398
pubmed: 32692456
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;114(1):53-62
pubmed: 25240162
Transfusion. 2005 Nov;45(11):1739-49
pubmed: 16271099
Semin Hematol. 2019 Oct;56(4):229-235
pubmed: 31836028
Biologicals. 2010 Jan;38(1):14-9
pubmed: 19995680