The Inversion Problem Why Algorithms Should Infer Mental State and Not Just Predict Behavior.

algorithms biases decision-making heuristics

Journal

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
ISSN: 1745-6924
Titre abrégé: Perspect Psychol Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 12 12 2023
pubmed: 12 12 2023
entrez: 12 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

More and more machine learning is applied to human behavior. Increasingly these algorithms suffer from a hidden-but serious-problem. It arises because they often predict one thing while hoping for another. Take a recommender system: It predicts clicks but hopes to identify preferences. Or take an algorithm that automates a radiologist: It predicts in-the-moment diagnoses while hoping to identify their reflective judgments. Psychology shows us the gaps between the objectives of such prediction tasks and the goals we hope to achieve: People can click mindlessly; experts can get tired and make systematic errors. We argue such situations are ubiquitous and call them "inversion problems": The real goal requires understanding a mental state that is not directly measured in behavioral data but must instead be inverted from the behavior. Identifying and solving these problems require new tools that draw on both behavioral and computational science.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38085919
doi: 10.1177/17456916231212138
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

17456916231212138

Auteurs

Jon Kleinberg (J)

Department of Computer Science, Cornell University.

Jens Ludwig (J)

Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago.

Sendhil Mullainathan (S)

Booth School of Business, University of Chicago.

Manish Raghavan (M)

Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Classifications MeSH