"Nasal dorsum anatomy of major different ethnicities - surgical implications. A multicenter radiological study."


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 12 12 2023
pubmed: 12 12 2023
entrez: 12 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The heterogeneity of nasal features across different ethnical groups is evident. This large-scale multicenter study evaluates dorsal keystone area and its relation to superficial nasal anatomy, through computed tomography (CT) scans. Six different populations were included: South Caucasian, Middle Eastern, Black South African, Eastern Asian, Mestizo and Eastern European. Each center obtained CT scans performed between January 2020 and December 2022 from patients presenting a nasal hump and from an age and sex-matched control group. Osteocartilaginous measurements in relation to Ethmoidal-point and to Rhinion, as well as their relation to superficial nasal anatomy, were collected from nasal CT scans in midsagittal view. These were compared between populations and, in each center, compared between patient groups (nasal hump versus no nasal hump). The study population included 600 patients (254 with nasal hump), with a mean age of 33.98 (ranging 18 - 59) years old, and 55.6% were female. The distance from the Ethmoidal-point averaged: to Rhinion 10.1(±3.5)mm; and to nasal hump beginning point 1.68 (±0.23)mm. In 96% of cases the Ethmoidal-point was cranial or no more than 5mm caudal to the beginning of the nasal hump. S-shaped nasal bones were associated with nasal hump but its angulation (kyphion angle) did not correlate with nasal hump height. In most patients, the nasal hump has no ethmoid bone underneath it, and it apex is located over the septal cartilage. The Ethmoidal-point is a reliable landmark and should be considered when appreciating established and new preservation and structural rhinoplasty approaches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The heterogeneity of nasal features across different ethnical groups is evident. This large-scale multicenter study evaluates dorsal keystone area and its relation to superficial nasal anatomy, through computed tomography (CT) scans.
METHODS METHODS
Six different populations were included: South Caucasian, Middle Eastern, Black South African, Eastern Asian, Mestizo and Eastern European. Each center obtained CT scans performed between January 2020 and December 2022 from patients presenting a nasal hump and from an age and sex-matched control group. Osteocartilaginous measurements in relation to Ethmoidal-point and to Rhinion, as well as their relation to superficial nasal anatomy, were collected from nasal CT scans in midsagittal view. These were compared between populations and, in each center, compared between patient groups (nasal hump versus no nasal hump).
RESULTS RESULTS
The study population included 600 patients (254 with nasal hump), with a mean age of 33.98 (ranging 18 - 59) years old, and 55.6% were female. The distance from the Ethmoidal-point averaged: to Rhinion 10.1(±3.5)mm; and to nasal hump beginning point 1.68 (±0.23)mm. In 96% of cases the Ethmoidal-point was cranial or no more than 5mm caudal to the beginning of the nasal hump. S-shaped nasal bones were associated with nasal hump but its angulation (kyphion angle) did not correlate with nasal hump height.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In most patients, the nasal hump has no ethmoid bone underneath it, and it apex is located over the septal cartilage. The Ethmoidal-point is a reliable landmark and should be considered when appreciating established and new preservation and structural rhinoplasty approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38085998
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011238
pii: 00006534-990000000-02210
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Auteurs

David R Dias (DR)

Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Department, Porto, Portugal.
Instituto Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto.

Mariline Santos (M)

Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Department, Porto, Portugal.
Instituto Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto.

Maryam Sharafi (M)

Skull Base Research Center, The Five Senses Health Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Theran, Iran.

Maryam Jalessi (M)

Skull Base Research Center, The Five Senses Health Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Theran, Iran.

Cameron McIntosh (C)

Edge Day Hospital, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

James Stutterheim (J)

Bayradiology, St Georges Hospital, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

Jisun Kim (J)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Seung Yeon Jeon (S)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Sun Seong Kang (S)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Carlos Pedroza (C)

ENT department , Clínica imbanaco, Cali -Colombia.

Daniel Pedroza (D)

ENT department , Clínica imbanaco, Cali -Colombia.

Yury Rusetsky (Y)

ENT Department the Central State Moscow Academy, Moscow, Russia.

Margarita Dobrokhotova (M)

Department of Radiology, A. I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.

Dmitry Lezhnev (D)

Department of Radiology, A. I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.

Miguel G Ferreira (MG)

Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Department, Porto, Portugal.
Instituto Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto.
Hospital da Luz - Arrábida, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.

Classifications MeSH