Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies?

Artificial intelligence BI-RADS Breast tumors Decision support Ultrasound

Journal

Academic radiology
ISSN: 1878-4046
Titre abrégé: Acad Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9440159

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 18 09 2023
revised: 18 11 2023
accepted: 20 11 2023
medline: 13 12 2023
pubmed: 13 12 2023
entrez: 13 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been increasingly applied to breast ultrasonography. They are expected to decrease the workload of radiologists and to improve diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of an AI system for the BI-RADS category assessment in breast masses detected on breast ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 715 masses detected in 530 patients were analyzed. Three breast imaging centers of the same institution and nine breast radiologists participated in this study. Ultrasound was performed by one radiologist who obtained two orthogonal views of each detected lesion. These images were retrospectively reviewed by a second radiologist blinded to the patient's clinical data. A commercial AI system evaluated images. The level of agreement between the AI system and the two radiologists and their diagnostic performance were calculated according to dichotomic BI-RADS category assessment. This study included 715 breast masses. Of these, 134 (18.75%) were malignant, and 581 (81.25%) were benign. In discriminating benign and probably benign from suspicious lesions, the agreement between AI and the first and second radiologists was moderate statistically. The sensitivity and specificity of radiologist 1, radiologist 2, and AI were calculated as 98.51% and 80.72%, 97.76% and 75.56%, and 98.51% and 65.40%, respectively. For radiologist 1, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 54.10%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.58%, and the accuracy was 84.06%. Radiologist 2 achieved a PPV of 47.99%, NPV of 99.32%, and accuracy of 79.72%. The AI system exhibited a PPV of 39.64%, NPV of 99.48%, and accuracy of 71.61%. Notably, none of the lesions categorized as BI-RADS 2 by AI were malignant, while 2 of the lesions classified as BI-RADS 3 by AI were subsequently confirmed as malignant. By considering AI-assigned BI-RADS 2 as safe, we could potentially avoid 11% (18 out of 163) of benign lesion biopsies and 46.2% (110 out of 238) of follow-ups. AI proves effective in predicting malignancy. Integrating it into the clinical workflow has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies and short-term follow-ups, which, in turn, can contribute to sustainability in healthcare practices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38087719
pii: S1076-6332(23)00666-9
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.11.031
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Nilgun Guldogan (N)

Breast Clinic, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, 34662, Istanbul, Turkey (N.G., E.Y., E.B.T., E.A.). Electronic address: nilguld@hotmail.com.

Fusun Taskin (F)

Department of Radiology, Acibadem M.A.A. University School of Medicine, Atakent University Hospital, 34755, Istanbul, Turkey (F.T., S.E.); Acibadem M.A.A. University Senology Research Institute, 34457, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey (F.T., G.E.I., U.T.P.).

Gul Esen Icten (GE)

Acibadem M.A.A. University Senology Research Institute, 34457, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey (F.T., G.E.I., U.T.P.); Department of Radiology, Acibadem M.A.A. University School of Medicine, Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, Büyükdere St. 40, 34457, Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey (G.E.I.).

Ebru Yilmaz (E)

Breast Clinic, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, 34662, Istanbul, Turkey (N.G., E.Y., E.B.T., E.A.).

Ebru Banu Turk (EB)

Breast Clinic, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, 34662, Istanbul, Turkey (N.G., E.Y., E.B.T., E.A.).

Servet Erdemli (S)

Department of Radiology, Acibadem M.A.A. University School of Medicine, Atakent University Hospital, 34755, Istanbul, Turkey (F.T., S.E.).

Ulku Tuba Parlakkilic (UT)

Acibadem M.A.A. University Senology Research Institute, 34457, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey (F.T., G.E.I., U.T.P.).

Ozlem Turkoglu (O)

Department of Radiology, Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (O.T.).

Erkin Aribal (E)

Breast Clinic, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, 34662, Istanbul, Turkey (N.G., E.Y., E.B.T., E.A.); Department of Radiology, Acibadem M.A.A. University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A.).

Classifications MeSH