Validity and Reliability of the FlightScope Mevo+ Launch Monitor for Assessing Golf Performance.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Dec 2023
13 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
13
12
2023
pubmed:
13
12
2023
entrez:
13
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Brennan, A, Murray, A, Coughlan, D, Mountjoy, M, Wells, J, Ehlert, A, Xu, J, Broadie, M, Turner, A, and Bishop, C. Validity and reliability of the FlightScope Mevo+ launch monitor for assessing golf performance. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2023-The purpose of this study was to (a) assess the validity of the FlightScope Mevo+ against the TrackMan 4 and (b) determine the within-session reliability of both launch monitor systems when using a driver and a 6-iron. Twenty-nine youth golfers, with a minimum of 3 years of playing experience, volunteered for this study. All golfers completed 10 shots with a 6-iron and a driver, with 8 metrics concurrently monitored from both launch monitor systems in an indoor biomechanics laboratory. For both clubs, Pearson's r values ranged from small to near perfect (r range = 0.254-0.985), with the strongest relationships evident for clubhead speed (CHS) and ball speed (r ≥ 0.92). Bland-Altman plots showed almost perfect levels of agreement between devices for smash factor (mean bias ≤-0.016; 95% CI: -0.112, 0.079), whereas the poorest levels of agreement was for spin rate (mean bias ≤1,238; 95% CI: -2,628, 5,103). From a reliability standpoint, the TrackMan showed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.60-0.99) and coefficient of variation (CV) values ranged from good to poor (CV = 1.31-230.22%). For the Mevo+ device, ICC data ranged from poor to excellent (ICC = -0.22 to 0.99) and CV values ranged from good to poor (CV = 1.46-72.70%). Importantly, both devices showed similar trends, with the strongest reliability consistently evident for CHS, ball speed, carry distance, and smash factor. Finally, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were evident between devices for spin rate (driver: d = 1.27; 6-iron: d = 0.90), launch angle (driver: d = 0.54), and attack angle (driver: d = -0.51). Collectively, these findings suggest that the FlightScope Mevo+ launch monitor is both valid and reliable when monitoring CHS, ball speed, carry distance, and smash factor. However, additional variables such as spin rate, launch angle, attack angle, and spin axis exhibit substantially greater variation compared with the TrackMan 4, suggesting that practitioners may wish to be cautious when providing golfers with feedback relating to these metrics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38090982
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004685
pii: 00124278-990000000-00355
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Banyard H, Nosaka K, Haff GG. Reliability and validity of the load–velocity relationship to predict the 1RM back squat. J Strength Cond Res 31: 1897–1904, 2017.
Betzler N, Monk S, Wallace E, Otto S. Variability in clubhead presentation characteristics and ball impact location for golfers' drives. J Sports Sci 30: 439–448, 2012.
Bishop C, Shrier I, Jordan M. Ratio data: Understanding pitfalls and knowing when to standardise. Symmetry 15: 318–319, 2023.
Bishop C, Turner A, Jordan M, et al. A framework to guide practitioners for selecting metrics during the countermovement and drop jump tests. Strength Cond J 44: 95–103, 2022.
Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327: 307–310, 1986.
Brennan A, Ehlert A, Wells J, et al. Monitoring performance in golf: More than just clubhead speed. Strength Cond J, 2022. Epub ahead of print.
FlightScope Mevo+—FlightScope Mevo UK Store [Internet]. Flightscopemevo.co.uk. 2022. Available at: https://flightscopemevo.co.uk/products/flightscope-mevo-plus: June 18, 2023.
Glazier P. Beyond animated skeletons: How can biomechanical feedback be used to enhance sports performance? J Biomech 129: 1–9, 2021.
Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 3–13, 2009.
Koo T, Li M. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15: 155–163, 2016.
Langdown B, Bridge M, Li F-X. Movement variability in the golf swing. Sports Biomech 11: 273–287, 2012.
Leach R, Forrester S, Mears A, Roberts J. How valid and accurate are measurements of golf impact parameters obtained using commercially available radar and stereoscopic optical launch monitors? Measurement 112: 125–136, 2017.
Lückemann P, Haid DM, Brömel P, Schwanitz S, Maiwald C. Validation of an inertial sensor system for swing analysis in golf. Proceedings 2: 246, 2018.
Omoregie P. The impact of technology on sport performance. In: Proceedings of the 2016 INCEDI Conference, Accra, Ghana., 2016. pp. 896–905.
Read P, Miller S, Turner A. The effects of postactivation potentiation on golf club head speed. J Strength Cond Res 27: 1579–1582, 2013.
Rhea M. Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size. J Strength Cond Res 18: 918–920, 2004.
Titleist. 2023 Pro V1x Radar Capture Technology (RCT) | Titleist [Internet]. www.titleist.co.uk. 2023. Available at: https://www.titleist.co.uk/en_GB/product/pro-v1x-rct/004PVXRCT.html: July 13, 2023.
Trackman. TrackMan 4—The Superior Technology [Internet]. www.trackman.com. 2023. Available at: https://www.trackman.com/golf/trackman-4/tech-specs: June 20, 2023.
Villarrasa-Sapiña I, Ortega-Benavent N, Monfort-Torres G, Ramon-Llin J, García-Massó X. Test-retest reliability of task performance for golf swings of medium-to high-handicap players. Sensors 22: 9069, 2022.
Wells J, Mitchell A, Charalambous L, Fletcher I. Relationships between highly skilled golfers' clubhead velocity and force producing capabilities during vertical jumps and an isometric mid-thigh pull. J Sports Sci 36: 1847–1851, 2018.