90Y SPECT scatter estimation and voxel dosimetry in radioembolization using a unified deep learning framework.
90Y
Deep learning
Dosimetry
Radioembolization
SPECT
Scatter correction
Journal
EJNMMI physics
ISSN: 2197-7364
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101658952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Dec 2023
13 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
18
04
2023
accepted:
28
11
2023
medline:
13
12
2023
pubmed:
13
12
2023
entrez:
13
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
90Y SPECT-based dosimetry following radioembolization (RE) in liver malignancies is challenging due to the inherent scatter and the poor spatial resolution of bremsstrahlung SPECT. This study explores a deep-learning-based absorbed dose-rate estimation method for 90Y that mitigates the impact of poor SPECT image quality on dosimetry and the accuracy-efficiency trade-off of Monte Carlo (MC)-based scatter estimation and voxel dosimetry methods. Our unified framework consists of three stages: convolutional neural network (CNN)-based bremsstrahlung scatter estimation, SPECT reconstruction with scatter correction (SC) and absorbed dose-rate map generation with a residual learning network (DblurDoseNet). The input to the framework is the measured SPECT projections and CT, and the output is the absorbed dose-rate map. For training and testing under realistic conditions, we generated a series of virtual patient phantom activity/density maps from post-therapy images of patients treated with 90Y-RE at our clinic. To train the scatter estimation network, we use the scatter projections for phantoms generated from MC simulation as the ground truth (GT). To train the dosimetry network, we use MC dose-rate maps generated directly from the activity/density maps of phantoms as the GT (Phantom + MC Dose). We compared performance of our framework (SPECT w/CNN SC + DblurDoseNet) and MC dosimetry (SPECT w/CNN SC + MC Dose) using normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) relative to GT. When testing on virtual patient phantoms, our CNN predicted scatter projections had NRMSE of 4.0% ± 0.7% on average. For the SPECT reconstruction with CNN SC, we observed a significant improvement on NRMSE (9.2% ± 1.7%), compared to reconstructions with no SC (149.5% ± 31.2%). In terms of virtual patient dose-rate estimation, SPECT w/CNN SC + DblurDoseNet had a NMAE of 8.6% ± 5.7% and 5.4% ± 4.8% in lesions and healthy livers, respectively; compared to 24.0% ± 6.1% and 17.7% ± 2.1% for SPECT w/CNN SC + MC Dose. In patient dose-rate maps, though no GT was available, we observed sharper lesion boundaries and increased lesion-to-background ratios with our framework. For a typical patient data set, the trained networks took ~ 1 s to generate the scatter estimate and ~ 20 s to generate the dose-rate map (matrix size: 512 × 512 × 194) on a single GPU (NVIDIA V100). Our deep learning framework, trained using true activity/density maps, has the potential to outperform non-learning voxel dosimetry methods such as MC that are dependent on SPECT image quality. Across comprehensive testing and evaluations on multiple targeted lesions and healthy livers in virtual patients, our proposed deep learning framework demonstrated higher (66% on average in terms of NMAE) estimation accuracy than the current "gold-standard" MC method. The enhanced computing speed with our framework without sacrificing accuracy is highly relevant for clinical dosimetry following 90Y-RE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38091168
doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00598-9
pii: 10.1186/s40658-023-00598-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
82Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB022075
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Weber M, et al. EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(5):1682–99.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05600-z
pubmed: 35146577
pmcid: 8940802
Garin E, et al. Trans-arterial radioembolization dosimetry in 2022. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022;45(11):1608–21.
doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03215-x
pubmed: 35982334
Wang TH, et al. Combined Yttrium-90 microsphere selective internal radiation therapy and external beam radiotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: from clinical aspects to dosimetry. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190098.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190098
pubmed: 29293557
pmcid: 5749761
Mee SF, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) following Yttrium-90 ((90)Y) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT): a feasibility planning study using(90)Y delivered dose. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68:065003.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acbbb5
pmcid: 10001703
Dewaraja YK, et al. Improved quantitative (90) Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT reconstruction with Monte Carlo scatter modeling. Med Phys. 2017;44(12):6364–76.
doi: 10.1002/mp.12597
pubmed: 28940483
pmcid: 5734647
Elschot M, et al. Quantitative Monte Carlo-based 90Y SPECT reconstruction. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(9):1557–63.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.119131
pubmed: 23907758
D’Arienzo M. Emission of β+ particles via internal pair production in the 0+ – 0+ transition of 90Zr: historical background and current applications in nuclear medicine imaging. Atoms. 2013;1(1):2–12.
doi: 10.3390/atoms1010002
Pasciak AS, et al. Radioembolization and the dynamic role of (90)Y PET/CT. Front Oncol. 2014;4:38.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00038
pubmed: 24579065
pmcid: 3936249
Siman W, Mikell JK, Kappadath SC. Practical reconstruction protocol for quantitative (90)Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT. Med Phys. 2016;43(9):5093.
doi: 10.1118/1.4960629
pubmed: 27587040
pmcid: 4991990
Tran-Gia J, Salas-Ramirez M, Lassmann M. What you see is not what you get: on the accuracy of voxel-based dosimetry in molecular radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(8):1178–86.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.231480
pubmed: 31862802
pmcid: 7413234
Bolch WE, et al. MIRD pamphlet No: the dosimetry of nonuniform activity distributions—radionuclide S values at the voxel level. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(1):11S-36S.
pubmed: 9935083
Castiglioni I, et al. AI applications to medical images: from machine learning to deep learning. Phys Med. 2021;83:9–24.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006
pubmed: 33662856
Reader AJ, et al. Deep learning for PET image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2021;5(1):1–25.
doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3014786
Visvikis D, et al. Application of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging: a review of current status and future perspectives for clinical translation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(13):4452–63.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05891-w
pubmed: 35809090
pmcid: 9606092
Bradshaw TJ, et al. Nuclear medicine and artificial intelligence: best practices for algorithm development. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(4):500–10.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262567
pubmed: 34740952
Xiang H, et al. A deep neural network for fast and accurate scatter estimation in quantitative SPECT/CT under challenging scatter conditions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(13):2956–67.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04840-9
pubmed: 32415551
pmcid: 7666660
Lee MS, et al. Deep-dose: a voxel dose estimation method using deep convolutional neural network for personalized internal dosimetry. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10308.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46620-y
pubmed: 31311963
pmcid: 6635490
Akhavanallaf A, et al. Whole-body voxel-based internal dosimetry using deep learning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(3):670–82.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05013-4
pubmed: 32875430
Gotz TI, et al. A deep learning approach to radiation dose estimation. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(3):035007.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab65dc
pubmed: 31881547
Li ZY, et al. DblurDoseNet: a deep residual learning network for voxel radionuclide dosimetry compensating for single-photon emission computerized tomography imaging resolution. Med Phys. 2022;49(2):1216–30.
doi: 10.1002/mp.15397
pubmed: 34882821
Ljungberg M, Strand S-E, King MA. Monte Carlo calculations in nuclear medicine: applications in diagnostic imaging. 2nd ed. Series in medical physics and biomedical engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013. p. 111–28.
Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. 2014. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980 .
Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(4):601–9.
doi: 10.1109/42.363108
pubmed: 18218538
Fessler JA. Michigan image reconstruction toolbox. Available from: https://github.com/JeffFessler/mirt .
Wilderman SJ, Dewaraja YK. Method for fast CT/SPECT-based 3D Monte Carlo absorbed dose computations in internal emitter therapy. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2007;54(1):146–51.
doi: 10.1109/TNS.2006.889164
pubmed: 20305792
pmcid: 2841294
Kessler RM, Ellis JR Jr, Eden M. Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8(3):514–22.
doi: 10.1097/00004728-198406000-00028
pubmed: 6609942
Tran-Gia J, Lassmann M. Optimizing image quantification for (177)Lu SPECT/CT based on a 3D printed 2-compartment kidney phantom. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(4):616–24.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.200170
pubmed: 29097409
Li Z, Dewaraja YK, Fessler JA. Training end-to-end unrolled iterative neural networks for SPECT image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2023;7:410–20.
doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2023.3240934
pubmed: 37021108
pmcid: 10072846
Segars WP, et al. 4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. Med Phys. 2010;37(9):4902–15.
doi: 10.1118/1.3480985
pubmed: 20964209
pmcid: 2941518