Differences in eye movements for face recognition between Canadian and Chinese participants are not modulated by social orientation.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 24 04 2023
accepted: 18 11 2023
medline: 14 12 2023
pubmed: 14 12 2023
entrez: 14 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Face recognition strategies do not generalize across individuals. Many studies have reported robust cultural differences between West Europeans/North Americans and East Asians in eye movement strategies during face recognition. The social orientation hypothesis posits that individualistic vs. collectivistic (IND/COL) value systems, respectively defining West European/North American and East Asian societies, would be at the root of many cultural differences in visual perception. Whether social orientation is also responsible for such cultural contrast in face recognition remains to be clarified. To this aim, we conducted two experiments with West European/North American and Chinese observers. In Experiment 1, we probed the existence of a link between IND/COL social values and eye movements during face recognition, by using an IND/COL priming paradigm. In Experiment 2, we dissected the latter relationship in greater depth, by using two IND/COL questionnaires, including subdimensions to those concepts. In both studies, cultural differences in fixation patterns were revealed between West European/North American and East Asian observers. Priming IND/COL values did not modulate eye movement visual sampling strategies, and only specific subdimensions of the IND/COL questionnaires were associated with distinct eye-movement patterns. Altogether, we show that the typical contrast between IND/COL cannot fully account for cultural differences in eye movement strategies for face recognition. Cultural differences in eye movements for faces might originate from mechanisms distinct from social orientation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38096320
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295256
pii: PONE-D-23-11102
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0295256

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Gingras et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Francis Gingras (F)

Département de psychoéducation et psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada.
Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Amanda Estéphan (A)

Département de psychoéducation et psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada.
Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Daniel Fiset (D)

Département de psychoéducation et psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada.

He Lingnan (H)

School of Communication and Design, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Roberto Caldara (R)

Eye and Brain Mapping Laboratory (iBMLab), Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Caroline Blais (C)

Département de psychoéducation et psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada.

Classifications MeSH