Impact of Low-Dose Dronabinol Therapy on Cognitive Function in Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Care: A Case-Series Intervention Study.

cancer cognitive impairment medical cannabis pain management sleep disturbances

Journal

Palliative medicine reports
ISSN: 2689-2820
Titre abrégé: Palliat Med Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101770666

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
accepted: 06 11 2023
medline: 15 12 2023
pubmed: 15 12 2023
entrez: 15 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cannabis may offer therapeutic benefits to patients with advanced cancer not responding adequately to conventional palliative treatment. However, tolerability is a major concern. Cognitive function is a potential adverse reaction to tetrahydrocannabinol containing regimens. The aim of this study was to test cognitive function in patients being prescribed dronabinol as an adjuvant palliative therapy. Adult patients with advanced cancer and severe related pain refractory to conventional palliative treatment were included in this case-series study. Patients were examined at baseline in conjunction with initiation of dronabinol therapy and at a two-week follow-up using three selected Wechsler's adult intelligence scale III neurocognitive tests: Processing Speed Index (PSI), Perceptual Organization Index (POI), and Working Memory Index (WMI). Patients were also assessed using pain visual analog scale, Major Depression Inventory, and Brief Fatigue Inventory. Eight patients consented to take part in the study. Two patients discontinued dronabinol therapy, one due to a complaint of dizziness and another critical progression of cancer disease, respectively. The remaining six patients were successfully treated with a daily dosage of 12.5 mg dronabinol ( Cognitive function improved in this group of patients with advanced cancer in conjunction with low-dose dronabinol therapy. The cause is likely multifactorial including reported relief of cancer-associated symptoms. Further clinical investigation is required.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Cannabis may offer therapeutic benefits to patients with advanced cancer not responding adequately to conventional palliative treatment. However, tolerability is a major concern. Cognitive function is a potential adverse reaction to tetrahydrocannabinol containing regimens. The aim of this study was to test cognitive function in patients being prescribed dronabinol as an adjuvant palliative therapy.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Adult patients with advanced cancer and severe related pain refractory to conventional palliative treatment were included in this case-series study. Patients were examined at baseline in conjunction with initiation of dronabinol therapy and at a two-week follow-up using three selected Wechsler's adult intelligence scale III neurocognitive tests: Processing Speed Index (PSI), Perceptual Organization Index (POI), and Working Memory Index (WMI). Patients were also assessed using pain visual analog scale, Major Depression Inventory, and Brief Fatigue Inventory.
Results UNASSIGNED
Eight patients consented to take part in the study. Two patients discontinued dronabinol therapy, one due to a complaint of dizziness and another critical progression of cancer disease, respectively. The remaining six patients were successfully treated with a daily dosage of 12.5 mg dronabinol (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Cognitive function improved in this group of patients with advanced cancer in conjunction with low-dose dronabinol therapy. The cause is likely multifactorial including reported relief of cancer-associated symptoms. Further clinical investigation is required.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38098857
doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0024
pii: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0024
pmc: PMC10719641
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

326-333

Informations de copyright

© Ditte Buchwald et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors do not have potential conflicts of interest, including relevant financial interests, activities, relationships, and affiliations related to this article.

Auteurs

Ditte Buchwald (D)

Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.
Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Casper Schmidt (C)

Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Dorte Buchwald (D)

Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.
Palliative Care Team, Department of Gerontology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.

Kristina Iris Winter (KI)

Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.
Palliative Care Team, Department of Gerontology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.

Ivan Bo Nielsen (IB)

Palliative Care Team, Department of Gerontology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.

Kirsten Klostergaard (K)

Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.

Dorte Melgaard (D)

Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.
Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Steen K Fagerberg (SK)

Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.

Peter Derek Christian Leutscher (PDC)

Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.
Palliative Care Team, Department of Gerontology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH