EngAge - A metacognitive intervention to supplement working memory training: A feasibility study in older adults.

Cognitive training Engagement Metacognition Motivation Subjective memory

Journal

Aging brain
ISSN: 2589-9589
Titre abrégé: Aging Brain
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101776137

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 16 01 2023
revised: 31 03 2023
accepted: 15 06 2023
medline: 15 12 2023
pubmed: 15 12 2023
entrez: 15 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Working Memory (WM) training has shown promise in supporting cognitive functioning in older adult populations, but effects that generalize beyond the trained task have been inconsistent. Targeting cognitive processes in isolation might be a limiting factor given that metacognitive and motivational factors have been shown to impact older adults' engagement with challenging cognitive activities, such as WM training. The current feasibility study implemented a novel metacognitive intervention in conjunction with WM training in older adults and examined its potential amplifying short- and long-term effects on cognitive and self-report outcomes as compared to WM or active control training alone. One-hundred and nineteen older adults completed a cognitive training over the course of 20 sessions at home. The cognitive training targeted either WM or general knowledge. In addition, one of the WM training groups completed a metacognitive program via group seminars. We tested for group differences in WM, inhibitory control, and episodic memory, and we assessed participants' perceived self-efficacy and everyday memory failures. At post-test, we replicated earlier work by demonstrating that participants who completed the WM intervention outperformed the active control group in non-trained WM measures, and to some extent, in inhibitory control. However, we found no evidence that the supplemental metacognitive program led to benefits over and above the WM intervention. Nonetheless, we conclude that our metacognitive program is a step in the right direction given the tentative long-term effects and participants' positive feedback, but more longitudinal data with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these early findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38098966
doi: 10.1016/j.nbas.2023.100083
pii: S2589-9589(23)00020-8
pmc: PMC10719574
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100083

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Susanne M Jaeggi (SM)

University of California, Irvine, USA.

Alexandria N Weaver (AN)

University of California, Irvine, USA.

Elena Carbone (E)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.

Francesca E Trane (FE)

University of Colorado Boulder, USA.

Rachel N Smith-Peirce (RN)

Washington University in St. Louis, USA.

Martin Buschkuehl (M)

MIND Research Institute, Irvine, USA.

Christoph Flueckiger (C)

University of Kassel, Germany.

Madison Carlson (M)

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

John Jonides (J)

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Erika Borella (E)

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.

Classifications MeSH