A perspective on the use of deep deterministic policy gradient reinforcement learning for retention time modeling in reversed-phase liquid chromatography.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques are increasingly used for different tasks related to method development in liquid chromatography. In this study, the possibilities of a reinforcement learning algorithm, more specifically a deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm, are evaluated for the selection of scouting runs for retention time modeling. As a theoretical exercise, it is investigated whether such an algorithm can be trained to select scouting runs for any compound of interest allowing to retrieve its correct retention parameters for the three-parameter Neue-Kuss retention model. It is observed that three scouting runs are generally sufficient to retrieve the retention parameters with an accuracy (mean relative percentage error MRPE) of 1 % or less. When given the opportunity to select additional scouting runs, this does not lead to a significantly improved accuracy. It is also observed that the agent tends to give preference to isocratic scouting runs for retention time modeling, and is only motivated towards selecting gradient scouting runs when penalized (strongly) for large analysis/gradient times. This seems to reinforce the general power and usefulness of isocratic scouting runs for retention time modeling. Finally, the best results (lowest MRPE) are obtained when the agent manages to retrieve retention time data for % ACN at elution of the compound under consideration that spread the entire relevant range of ACN (5 % ACN to 95 % ACN) as well as possible, i.e., resulting in retention data at a low, intermediate and high % ACN. Based on the obtained results, we believe reinforcement learning holds great potential to automate and rationalize method development in liquid chromatography in the future.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.