Cabozantinib in the Routine Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence.

Advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) Effectiveness Monotherapy Real-world patients Tolerability

Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 05 10 2023
revised: 01 11 2023
accepted: 02 11 2023
medline: 16 12 2023
pubmed: 16 12 2023
entrez: 15 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Real-world cabozantinib use has increased since its approval to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 2016. We reviewed cabozantinib use in real-world clinical practice and compared outcomes with pivotal cabozantinib randomized control trials (RCTs). This PRISMA-standard systematic literature review evaluated real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cabozantinib in patients with RCC (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021245854). Systematic MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane database searches were conducted on November 2, 2022. Eligible publications included ≥ 20 patients with RCC receiving cabozantinib. After double-screening for eligibility, standardized data were abstracted, qualitatively summarized, and assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of 353 screened publications, 41 were included, representing approximately 11,000 real-world patients. Most publications reported cabozantinib monotherapy cohort studies (40/41) of retrospective (39/41) and multicenter (32/41) design; most included patients from North America and/or Europe (30/41). Baseline characteristics were demographically similar between real-world and pivotal RCT populations, but real-world populations showed greater variation in prevalence of prior nephrectomy, multiple-site/brain metastasis, and nonclear-cell RCC histology. Cabozantinib activity was reported across real-world treatment lines and tumor types. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate values from pivotal RCTs were within the ranges reported for equivalent outcomes across real-world studies. Common real-world grade ≥ 3 adverse events were consistent with those in pivotal RCTs (fatigue, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension), but less frequent. No new tolerability concerns were identified. Real-world RCC survival outcomes for cabozantinib monotherapy were broadly consistent with pivotal RCTs, despite greater heterogeneity in real-world populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38101983
pii: S1558-7673(23)00237-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure MG-G: Consultancy or advisory role: Amgen, Astellas Medivation, AstraZeneca, Bayer/Onyx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; Research funding (to institution): AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, and Roche; Travel, accommodations, and expenses: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer, and Roche. LB: Consultancy or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. MTC: Consultancy or advisory role: Astellas, AstraZeneca, AXDev, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, Pfizer, and SeaGen; Research funding: ApricityHealth, Aravive, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Janssen, and Pfizer/EMD Serono; Nonbranded educational programs: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer/EMD Serono, and Roche. AM: Consultancy or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, Ipsen, Pfizer, and Tesaro. BV: Consultancy or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; travel/accommodation/expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, and Ipsen; Research funding (institution): Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, and Pfizer; Speaker bureau/expert testimony: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, EUSA Pharma, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Pfizer. JZ: Research funding: Ipsen. PD: Employment: Ipsen; Stock and other ownership interests: Biogen and Ipsen. GP: Consulting or advisory role: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Janssen, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. LA: Consulting or advisory role: Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, and Roche; Travel, accommodation, expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, and MSD.

Auteurs

Marine Gross-Goupil (M)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux Saint André, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: marine.gross-goupil@chu-bordeaux.fr.

Lubomir Bodnar (L)

University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, Institute of Health Sciences, Siedlce, Poland.

Matthew T Campbell (MT)

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Agnieszka Michael (A)

University of Surrey, School of Biosciences and Medicine, Guildford, UK.

Balaji Venugopal (B)

Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Jakub Żołnierek (J)

LuxMed Onkologia, Warsaw, Poland.

Pascale Dutailly (P)

Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Giuseppe Procopio (G)

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Laurence Albiges (L)

Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH