Intra and inter-rater variability in the construction of patient-specific musculoskeletal model.

Hip joint Moment arm Musculoskeletal model Variability

Journal

Gait & posture
ISSN: 1879-2219
Titre abrégé: Gait Posture
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9416830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 07 08 2023
revised: 29 11 2023
accepted: 05 12 2023
medline: 17 12 2023
pubmed: 17 12 2023
entrez: 16 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Variations observed in biomechanical studies might be attributed to errors made by operators during the construction of musculoskeletal models, rather than being solely attributed to patient-specific geometry. What is the impact of operator errors on the construction of musculoskeletal models, and how does it affect the estimation of muscle moment arms and hip joint reaction forces? Thirteen independent operators participated in defining the muscle model, while a single operator performed 13 repetitions to define the muscle model based on 3D bone geometry. For each model, the muscle moment arms relative to the hip joint center of rotation was evaluated. Additionally, the hip joint reaction force during one-legged stance was assessed using static inverse optimization. The results indicated high levels of consistency, as evidenced by the intra- rater and inter-rater agreement measured by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), which yielded values of 0.95 and 0.99, respectively. However, the estimated muscle moment arms exhibited an error of up to 16 mm compared to the reference musculoskeletal model. It was found that muscles attached to prominent anatomical landmarks were specified with greater accuracy than those attached over larger areas. Furthermore, the variability in estimated moment arms contributed to variations of up to 12% in the hip joint reaction forces. Both moment arm and muscle force demonstrated significantly lower variability when assessed by a single operator, suggesting the preference for employing a single operator in the creation of musculoskeletal models for clinical biomechanical studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Variations observed in biomechanical studies might be attributed to errors made by operators during the construction of musculoskeletal models, rather than being solely attributed to patient-specific geometry.
RESEARCH QUESTION OBJECTIVE
What is the impact of operator errors on the construction of musculoskeletal models, and how does it affect the estimation of muscle moment arms and hip joint reaction forces?
METHODS METHODS
Thirteen independent operators participated in defining the muscle model, while a single operator performed 13 repetitions to define the muscle model based on 3D bone geometry. For each model, the muscle moment arms relative to the hip joint center of rotation was evaluated. Additionally, the hip joint reaction force during one-legged stance was assessed using static inverse optimization.
RESULTS RESULTS
The results indicated high levels of consistency, as evidenced by the intra- rater and inter-rater agreement measured by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), which yielded values of 0.95 and 0.99, respectively. However, the estimated muscle moment arms exhibited an error of up to 16 mm compared to the reference musculoskeletal model. It was found that muscles attached to prominent anatomical landmarks were specified with greater accuracy than those attached over larger areas. Furthermore, the variability in estimated moment arms contributed to variations of up to 12% in the hip joint reaction forces.
SIGNIFICANCE CONCLUSIONS
Both moment arm and muscle force demonstrated significantly lower variability when assessed by a single operator, suggesting the preference for employing a single operator in the creation of musculoskeletal models for clinical biomechanical studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38103325
pii: S0966-6362(23)01505-9
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.12.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

195-198

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Jan Votava (J)

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technicka 4, 16000 Prague, Czechia.

Adam Kratochvíl (A)

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technicka 4, 16000 Prague, Czechia.

Matej Daniel (M)

Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technicka 4, 16000 Prague, Czechia. Electronic address: matej.daniel@fs.cvut.cz.

Classifications MeSH