A Phase 2 Study of Sitravatinib in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Nivolumab Sitravatinib Urothelial carcinoma

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 18 10 2023
revised: 16 11 2023
accepted: 01 12 2023
medline: 18 12 2023
pubmed: 18 12 2023
entrez: 17 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) has demonstrated survival benefits in urothelial carcinoma (UC); however, not all patients benefit from CPI due to resistance. Combining sitravatinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of TYRO3, AXL, and MERTK (TAM) receptors and VEGFR2, with CPI may improve antitumor responses. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC. The 516-003 trial (NCT03606174) is an open-label, multicohort phase 2 study evaluating sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC enrolled in eight cohorts depending on prior treatment with CPI, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), or antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Overall, 244 patients were enrolled and treated with sitravatinib plus nivolumab (median follow-up 14.1-38.2 mo). Sitravatinib (free-base capsules 120 mg once daily [QD] or malate capsule 100 mg QD) plus nivolumab (240 mg every 2 wk/480 mg every 4 wk intravenously). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. The Predictive probability design and confidence interval methods were used. Among patients previously treated with PBC, ORR, and median PFS were 32.1% and 3.9 mo in CPI-naïve patients (n = 53), 14.9% and 3.9 mo in CPI-refractory patients (n = 67), and 5.4% and 3.7 mo in CPI- and ADC-refractory patients (n = 56), respectively. Across all cohorts, grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 51.2% patients and grade 4 in 3.3%, with one treatment-related death (cardiac failure). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 50.4% patients. TRAEs led to sitravatinib/nivolumab discontinuation in 6.1% patients. Sitravatinib plus nivolumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile but did not result in clinically meaningful ORRs in patients with advanced/metastatic UC in the eight cohorts studied. In this study, the combination of two anticancer drugs, sitravatinib and nivolumab, resulted in manageable side effects but no meaningful responses in patients with bladder cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) has demonstrated survival benefits in urothelial carcinoma (UC); however, not all patients benefit from CPI due to resistance. Combining sitravatinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of TYRO3, AXL, and MERTK (TAM) receptors and VEGFR2, with CPI may improve antitumor responses. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC.
METHODS METHODS
The 516-003 trial (NCT03606174) is an open-label, multicohort phase 2 study evaluating sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC enrolled in eight cohorts depending on prior treatment with CPI, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), or antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Overall, 244 patients were enrolled and treated with sitravatinib plus nivolumab (median follow-up 14.1-38.2 mo). Sitravatinib (free-base capsules 120 mg once daily [QD] or malate capsule 100 mg QD) plus nivolumab (240 mg every 2 wk/480 mg every 4 wk intravenously).
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS UNASSIGNED
The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. The Predictive probability design and confidence interval methods were used. Among patients previously treated with PBC, ORR, and median PFS were 32.1% and 3.9 mo in CPI-naïve patients (n = 53), 14.9% and 3.9 mo in CPI-refractory patients (n = 67), and 5.4% and 3.7 mo in CPI- and ADC-refractory patients (n = 56), respectively. Across all cohorts, grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 51.2% patients and grade 4 in 3.3%, with one treatment-related death (cardiac failure). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 50.4% patients. TRAEs led to sitravatinib/nivolumab discontinuation in 6.1% patients.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Sitravatinib plus nivolumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile but did not result in clinically meaningful ORRs in patients with advanced/metastatic UC in the eight cohorts studied.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
In this study, the combination of two anticancer drugs, sitravatinib and nivolumab, resulted in manageable side effects but no meaningful responses in patients with bladder cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38105142
pii: S2588-9311(23)00282-1
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Pavlos Msaouel (P)

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: PMsaouel@mdanderson.org.

Randy F Sweis (RF)

University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Manojkumar Bupathi (M)

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Littleton, Littleton, CO, USA.

Elisabeth Heath (E)

Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.

Oscar B Goodman (OB)

Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada - Southwest, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Christopher J Hoimes (CJ)

Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.

Matthew I Milowsky (MI)

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Nancy Davis (N)

Vanderbilt - Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty (AR)

University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

Joel Picus (J)

Washington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

David Shaffer (D)

New York Oncology Hematology - Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.

Shifeng Mao (S)

Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Nabil Adra (N)

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Jeffrey Yorio (J)

Texas Oncology - Austin Central, Austin, TX, USA.

Sunil Gandhi (S)

Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute - North Region (SCRI), Tampa Bay, FL, USA.

Petros Grivas (P)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Arlene Siefker-Radtke (A)

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Rui Yang (R)

Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Lisa Latven (L)

Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Peter Olson (P)

Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Curtis D Chin (CD)

Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Hirak Der-Torossian (H)

Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Amir Mortazavi (A)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Gopa Iyer (G)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH