Effectiveness of the preventive administration of vasoactive amines in counterbalancing significant patient blood pressure drops following nimodipine administration during mechanical thrombectomy procedures.

Stroke nimodipine stentriever thrombectomy vasospasm

Journal

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 18 12 2023
pubmed: 18 12 2023
entrez: 17 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Focal vasospasm (FV) of the occluded vessel can occur during the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Nimodipine is commonly used to treat vasospasm and can play a role in distinguishing it from artery narrowing due to iatrogenic dissection or residual clot. However, nimodipine administration can result in arterial hypotension and subsequent enlargement of the ischemic core. To assess the efficacy of preventive and continuous vasoactive amine infusion to counterbalance nimodipine-induced hypotension. We reviewed data from a prospective registry of patients treated for AIS between January 2019 and January 2022 who were administered nimodipine. All patients were equipped with an arterial cannula for invasive blood pressure measurement and given vasoactive amines preemptively before general anesthesia and throughout the procedure. Data obtained from invasive monitoring of mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in a time-lapse of 25 min before and after nimodipine administration were analyzed. MABP significantly decreased after nimodipine administration but remained within the recommended range (81.79 ± 0.49 mmHg). Nimodipine was effective in reducing FV caused by stent retriever passage in 76.3% of cases. Furthermore, it proved valuable in diagnosing iatrogenic dissection (9.2%), residual clot (10.5%), or intracranial stenosis (4%). Infusion of vasoactive amines effectively counteracted the intraarterial nimodipine effect, thus avoiding frank arterial hypotension during endovascular treatment. Nimodipine has been useful in differentiating the diagnosis of FV resulting from mechanical thrombectomy and other potential causes, such as iatrogenic dissection or residual clot.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Focal vasospasm (FV) of the occluded vessel can occur during the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Nimodipine is commonly used to treat vasospasm and can play a role in distinguishing it from artery narrowing due to iatrogenic dissection or residual clot. However, nimodipine administration can result in arterial hypotension and subsequent enlargement of the ischemic core.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy of preventive and continuous vasoactive amine infusion to counterbalance nimodipine-induced hypotension.
METHODS METHODS
We reviewed data from a prospective registry of patients treated for AIS between January 2019 and January 2022 who were administered nimodipine. All patients were equipped with an arterial cannula for invasive blood pressure measurement and given vasoactive amines preemptively before general anesthesia and throughout the procedure. Data obtained from invasive monitoring of mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in a time-lapse of 25 min before and after nimodipine administration were analyzed.
RESULTS RESULTS
MABP significantly decreased after nimodipine administration but remained within the recommended range (81.79 ± 0.49 mmHg). Nimodipine was effective in reducing FV caused by stent retriever passage in 76.3% of cases. Furthermore, it proved valuable in diagnosing iatrogenic dissection (9.2%), residual clot (10.5%), or intracranial stenosis (4%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Infusion of vasoactive amines effectively counteracted the intraarterial nimodipine effect, thus avoiding frank arterial hypotension during endovascular treatment. Nimodipine has been useful in differentiating the diagnosis of FV resulting from mechanical thrombectomy and other potential causes, such as iatrogenic dissection or residual clot.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38105436
doi: 10.1177/15910199231221510
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15910199231221510

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: PM is consultant for Stryker and Medtronic.

Auteurs

Gianmarco Bernava (G)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Rosa Tesoro (R)

Division of Anesthesia, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

José Boto (J)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Myriam Challita (M)

Division of Anesthesia, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Andrea Rosi (A)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jeremy Hofmeister (J)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Hasan Yilmaz (H)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Emmanuel Carrera (E)

Division of Neurology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Olivier Brina (O)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Philippe Reymond (P)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Michel Muster (M)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Zsolt Kulcsar (Z)

Division of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Karl-Olof Lovblad (KO)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Paolo Machi (P)

Division of Neuroradiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH