Restriction of oxycodone in the emergency department (ROXY-ED): A randomised controlled trial.

Analgesics drug prescriptions emergency service hospital opioid physicians’ practice patterns randomised controlled trial

Journal

British journal of pain
ISSN: 2049-4637
Titre abrégé: Br J Pain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101583844

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 18 12 2023
pubmed: 18 12 2023
entrez: 18 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The prescription of opioids in emergency care has been associated with harm, including overdose and dependence. The aim of this trial was to assess restriction of access to oxycodone (ROXY), in combination with education and guideline modifications, versus education and guideline modifications alone (standard care) to reduce oxycodone administration in the Emergency Department (ED). An unblinded, active control, randomised controlled trial was conducted in an adult tertiary ED. Participants were patients aged 18-75 years who had analgesics administered in the ED. The primary intervention was ROXY, through removal of all oxycodone immediate release tablets from the ED imprest, with availability of a small supply after senior clinician approval. The intervention did not restrict prescription of discharge medications. The primary outcome measure was oxycodone administration rates. Secondary outcomes were administration rates of other analgesic medications, time to initial analgesics and oxycodone prescription on discharge. There were 2258 patients eligible for analysis. Oxycodone was administered to 80 (6.1%) patients in the ROXY group and 221 (23.3%) patients in the standard care group (relative risk (RR) 0.26; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.33; Restricted access to oxycodone was superior to education and guideline modifications alone for reducing oxycodone use in the ED and reducing discharge prescriptions of oxycodone from the ED. The addition of simple restrictive interventions is recommended to enable rapid changes to clinician behaviour to reduce the potential harm associated with the prescribing of oxycodone in the ED.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The prescription of opioids in emergency care has been associated with harm, including overdose and dependence. The aim of this trial was to assess restriction of access to oxycodone (ROXY), in combination with education and guideline modifications, versus education and guideline modifications alone (standard care) to reduce oxycodone administration in the Emergency Department (ED).
Methods UNASSIGNED
An unblinded, active control, randomised controlled trial was conducted in an adult tertiary ED. Participants were patients aged 18-75 years who had analgesics administered in the ED. The primary intervention was ROXY, through removal of all oxycodone immediate release tablets from the ED imprest, with availability of a small supply after senior clinician approval. The intervention did not restrict prescription of discharge medications. The primary outcome measure was oxycodone administration rates. Secondary outcomes were administration rates of other analgesic medications, time to initial analgesics and oxycodone prescription on discharge.
Results UNASSIGNED
There were 2258 patients eligible for analysis. Oxycodone was administered to 80 (6.1%) patients in the ROXY group and 221 (23.3%) patients in the standard care group (relative risk (RR) 0.26; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.33;
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Restricted access to oxycodone was superior to education and guideline modifications alone for reducing oxycodone use in the ED and reducing discharge prescriptions of oxycodone from the ED. The addition of simple restrictive interventions is recommended to enable rapid changes to clinician behaviour to reduce the potential harm associated with the prescribing of oxycodone in the ED.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38107754
doi: 10.1177/20494637231189031
pii: 10.1177_20494637231189031
pmc: PMC10722107
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

491-500

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Biswadev Mitra (B)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Cristina Roman (C)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Bertha Wu (B)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Carl Luckhoff (C)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Diana Goubrial (D)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Timothy Amos (T)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Holly Bannon-Murphy (H)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Ronald Huynh (R)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Michael Dooley (M)

Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

De Villiers Smit (V)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Peter A Cameron (PA)

Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Classifications MeSH