Stakeholders' Perspectives, Needs, and Barriers to Self-Management for People With Physical Disabilities Experiencing Chronic Conditions: Focus Group Study.

assistive technologies assistive technology barrier chronic chronic condition chronic illness data development digital disability focus group interview mental health need perspective physical activity physical disabilities physical disability qualitative self-management support symptom technology

Journal

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies
ISSN: 2369-2529
Titre abrégé: JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101703412

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 07 10 2022
accepted: 19 10 2023
revised: 28 09 2023
medline: 18 12 2023
pubmed: 18 12 2023
entrez: 18 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While self-management programs have had significant improvements for individuals with chronic conditions, less is known about the impact of self-management programs for individuals with physical disabilities who experience chronic conditions, as no holistic self-management programs exist for this population. Similarly, there is limited knowledge of how other stakeholders, such as caregivers, health experts, and researchers, view self-management programs in the context of disability, chronic health conditions, and assistive technologies. This study aimed to obtain insight into how stakeholders perceive self-management relating to physical disability, chronic conditions, and assistive technologies. Nine focus groups were conducted by 2 trained facilitators using semistructured interview guides. Each guide contained questions relating to stakeholders' experiences, challenges with self-management programs, and perceptions of assistive technologies. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted on the focus group data. A total of 47 individuals participated in the focus groups. By using a constructivist grounded approach and inductive data collection, three main themes emerged from the focus groups: (1) perspectives, (2) needs, and (3) barriers of stakeholders. Stakeholders emphasized the importance of physical activity, mental health, symptom management, medication management, participant centeredness, and chronic disease and disability education. Participants viewed technology as a beneficial aide to their daily self-management and expressed their desire to have peer-to-peer support in web-based self-management programs. Additional views of technology included the ability to access individualized, educational content and connect with other individuals who experience similar health conditions or struggle with caregiving duties. The findings suggest that the development of any web-based self-management program should include mental health education and resources in addition to physical activity content and symptom management and be cost-effective. Beyond the inclusion of educational resources, stakeholders desired customization or patient centeredness in the program to meet the overall needs of individuals with physical disabilities and caregivers. The development of web-based self-management programs should be holistic in meeting the needs of all stakeholders. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05481593; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05481593.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While self-management programs have had significant improvements for individuals with chronic conditions, less is known about the impact of self-management programs for individuals with physical disabilities who experience chronic conditions, as no holistic self-management programs exist for this population. Similarly, there is limited knowledge of how other stakeholders, such as caregivers, health experts, and researchers, view self-management programs in the context of disability, chronic health conditions, and assistive technologies.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to obtain insight into how stakeholders perceive self-management relating to physical disability, chronic conditions, and assistive technologies.
METHODS METHODS
Nine focus groups were conducted by 2 trained facilitators using semistructured interview guides. Each guide contained questions relating to stakeholders' experiences, challenges with self-management programs, and perceptions of assistive technologies. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted on the focus group data.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 47 individuals participated in the focus groups. By using a constructivist grounded approach and inductive data collection, three main themes emerged from the focus groups: (1) perspectives, (2) needs, and (3) barriers of stakeholders. Stakeholders emphasized the importance of physical activity, mental health, symptom management, medication management, participant centeredness, and chronic disease and disability education. Participants viewed technology as a beneficial aide to their daily self-management and expressed their desire to have peer-to-peer support in web-based self-management programs. Additional views of technology included the ability to access individualized, educational content and connect with other individuals who experience similar health conditions or struggle with caregiving duties.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggest that the development of any web-based self-management program should include mental health education and resources in addition to physical activity content and symptom management and be cost-effective. Beyond the inclusion of educational resources, stakeholders desired customization or patient centeredness in the program to meet the overall needs of individuals with physical disabilities and caregivers. The development of web-based self-management programs should be holistic in meeting the needs of all stakeholders.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05481593; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05481593.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38109170
pii: v10i1e43309
doi: 10.2196/43309
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05481593']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e43309

Informations de copyright

©Eric Evans, Ayse Zengul, Amy Knight, Amanda Willig, Andrea Cherrington, Tapan Mehta, Mohanraj Thirumalai. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 18.12.2023.

Auteurs

Eric Evans (E)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Ayse Zengul (A)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Amy Knight (A)

Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Amanda Willig (A)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Andrea Cherrington (A)

Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Tapan Mehta (T)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Mohanraj Thirumalai (M)

Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Classifications MeSH