Artificial Intelligence-Based Emphysema Quantification in Routine Chest Computed Tomography: Correlation With Spirometry and Visual Emphysema Grading.


Journal

Journal of computer assisted tomography
ISSN: 1532-3145
Titre abrégé: J Comput Assist Tomogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703942

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 12 2023
pubmed: 19 12 2023
entrez: 18 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of the study is to assess the correlation between artificial intelligence (AI)-based low attenuation volume percentage (LAV%) with forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) and visual emphysema grades in routine chest computed tomography (CT). Furthermore, optimal LAV% cutoff values for predicting a FEV1/FVC < 70% or moderate to more extensive visual emphysema grades were calculated. In a retrospective study of 298 consecutive patients who underwent routine chest CT and spirometry examinations, LAV% was quantified using an AI-based software with a threshold < -950 HU. The FEV1/FVC was derived from spirometry, with FEV1/FVC < 70% indicating airway obstruction. The mean time interval of CT from spirometry was 3.87 ± 4.78 days. Severity of emphysema was visually graded by an experienced chest radiologist using an established 5-grade ordinal scale (Fleischner Society classification system). Spearman correlation coefficient between LAV% and FEV1/FVC was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic determined the optimal LAV% cutoff values for predicting a FEV1/FVC < 70% or a visual emphysema grade of moderate or higher (Fleischner grade 3-5). Significant correlation between LAV% and FEV1/FVC was found (ϱ = -0.477, P < 0.001). Increasing LAV% corresponded to higher visual emphysema grades. For patients with absent visual emphysema, mean LAV% was 2.98 ± 3.30, for patients with trace emphysema 3.22 ± 2.75, for patients with mild emphysema 3.90 ± 3.33, for patients with moderate emphysema 6.41 ± 3.46, for patients with confluent emphysema 9.02 ± 5.45, and for patients with destructive emphysema 16.90 ± 8.19. Optimal LAV% cutoff value for predicting a FEV1/FVC < 70 was 6.1 (area under the curve = 0.764, sensitivity = 0.773, specificity = 0.665), while for predicting a visual emphysema grade of moderate or higher, it was 4.7 (area under the curve = 0.802, sensitivity = 0.766, specificity = 0.742). Furthermore, correlation between visual emphysema grading and FEV1/FVC was found. In patients with FEV1/FVC < 70% a high proportion of subjects had emphysema grade 3 (moderate) or higher, whereas in patients with FEV1/FVC ≥ 70%, a larger proportion had emphysema grade 3 (moderate) or lower. The sensitivity for visual emphysema grading predicting a FEV1/FVC < 70% was 56.3% with an optimal cutoff point at a visual grade of 4 (confluent), demonstrating a lower sensitivity compared with LAV% (77.3%). A significant correlation between AI-based LAV% and FEV1/FVC as well as visual CT emphysema grades can be found in routine chest CT suggesting that AI-based LAV% measurement might be integrated as an add-on functional parameter in the evaluation of chest CT in the future.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38110294
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001572
pii: 00004728-990000000-00266
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

S.O.S. has a cooperation with Siemens-Healthineers, which does not bias the content of the manuscript. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Celli BR, Decramer M, Wedzicha JA, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: research questions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:e4–e27.
Diaz AA. Paraseptal emphysema: from the periphery of the lobule to the center of the stage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:783–784.
Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agustí AG, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:347–365.
Madani A, Keyzer C, Gevenois PA. Quantitative computed tomography assessment of lung structure and function in pulmonary emphysema. Eur Respir J. 2001;18:720–730.
Kang HS, Bak SH, Oh HY, et al. Computed tomography-based visual assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: comparison with pulmonary function test and quantitative computed tomography. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13:1495–1506.
Lynch DA, Moore CM, Wilson C, et al. CT-based visual classification of emphysema: association with mortality in the COPDGene study. Radiology. 2018;288:859–866.
Lynch DA, Austin JH, Hogg JC, et al. CT-definable subtypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2015;277:192–205.
El Kaddouri B, Strand MJ, Baraghoshi D, et al. Fleischner Society visual emphysema CT patterns help predict progression of emphysema in current and former smokers: results from the COPDGene study. Radiology. 2021;298:441–449.
Müller NL, Staples CA, Miller RR, et al. “Density mask”. An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. Chest. 1988;94:782–787.
Gevenois PA, de Maertelaer V, De Vuyst P, et al. Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:653–657.
Fischer AM, Varga-Szemes A, van Assen M, et al. Comparison of artificial intelligence-based fully automatic chest CT emphysema quantification to pulmonary function testing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214:1065–1071.
Coxson HO, Hogg JC. Erratum: a quantification of the lung surface area in emphysema using computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1500–1501.
Wiedbrauck D, Karczewski M, Schoenberg SO, et al. Influence of contrast agent on artificial intelligence-based CT low attenuation volume percentage measurement. Acta Radiol. 2023;64:2111–2117.
Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–338.
Yacoub B, Varga-Szemes A, Schoepf UJ, et al. Impact of artificial intelligence assistance on chest CT interpretation times: a prospective randomized study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;219:743–751.
Tanabe N, Sato S, Oguma T, et al. Associations of airway tree to lung volume ratio on computed tomography with lung function and symptoms in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res. 2019;20:77.
McGrow K. Artificial intelligence: essentials for nursing. Nursing. 2019;49:46–49.
Zhu D, Qiao C, Dai H, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of visual subtypes and low attenuation area based on HRCT in the diagnosis of COPD. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22:81.
Ebrahimian S, Digumarthy SR, Bizzo B, et al. Artificial intelligence has similar performance to subjective assessment of emphysema severity on chest CT. Acad Radiol. 2022;29:1189–1195.
Hersh CP, Washko GR, Estépar RSJ, et al. Paired inspiratory-expiratory chest CT scans to assess for small airways disease in COPD. Respir Res. 2013;14:42.
Obojski A, Patyk M, Zaleska-Dorobisz U. Similarities in quantitative computed tomography imaging of the lung in severe asthma with persistent airflow limitation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Med. 2021;10.
Stratelis G, Fransson SG, Schmekel B, et al. High prevalence of emphysema and its association with BMI: a study of smokers with normal spirometry. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26:241–247.
Barr RG, Berkowitz EA, Bigazzi F, et al. A combined pulmonary-radiology workshop for visual evaluation of COPD: study design, chest CT findings and concordance with quantitative evaluation. COPD. 2012;9:151–159.
Amaza IP, O'Shea AMJ, Fortis S, et al. Discordant quantitative and visual CT assessments in the diagnosis of emphysema. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021;16:1231–1242.
Mascalchi M, Camiciottoli G, Diciotti S. Lung densitometry: why, how and when. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:3319–3345.
Gierada DS, Bierhals AJ, Choong CK, et al. Effects of CT section thickness and reconstruction kernel on emphysema quantification relationship to the magnitude of the CT emphysema index. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:146–156.

Auteurs

Maciej Karczewski (M)

Department of Applied Mathematics, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland.

Stefan O Schoenberg (SO)

Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Hany Kayed (H)

Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Classifications MeSH