Male circumcision uptake and misperceived norms about male circumcision: Cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda.


Journal

Journal of global health
ISSN: 2047-2986
Titre abrégé: J Glob Health
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101578780

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 12 2023
pubmed: 19 12 2023
entrez: 19 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Over the past decade, 15 high-priority countries in eastern and southern Africa have promoted voluntary medical male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention. The prevalence of male circumcision in Uganda nearly doubled from 26% in 2011 to 43% in 2016, but remains below the 2020 target level. Little is known about how common male circumcision is perceived to be, how accurate such perceptions are, and whether they are associated with men's own circumcision uptake. We conducted a cross-sectional study of all adult residents of eight villages in Rwampara District, southwestern Uganda in 2020-2022. We elicited their perceptions of the adult male circumcision prevalence within their village: >50% (most men), 10% to <50% (some), <10%, (few to none), or do not know. We compared their perceived norms to the aggregated prevalence of circumcision reported in these villages. We used a modified multivariable Poisson regression model to estimate the association between perceived norms and personal circumcision uptake among men. We surveyed 1566 participants (91% response rate): 698 men and 868 women. Among the men, 167 (27%) reported being circumcised, including 167/444 (38%) men <50 years of age. Approximately one-fourth of the population (189 (27%) men and 177 (20%) women) believed that few to no men in their own village had been circumcised. In a multivariable regression model, men who underestimated the prevalence of male circumcision were less likely to be circumcised themselves (adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.37-0.83). In this population-based study in rural Uganda, one-fourth of men underestimated the prevalence of male circumcision. Men who underestimated the extent of circumcision uptake were themselves less likely to be circumcised. If the observed association is causal and underestimates within the population contribute to low uptake, then interventions correcting these misperceived norms could increase uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Over the past decade, 15 high-priority countries in eastern and southern Africa have promoted voluntary medical male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention. The prevalence of male circumcision in Uganda nearly doubled from 26% in 2011 to 43% in 2016, but remains below the 2020 target level. Little is known about how common male circumcision is perceived to be, how accurate such perceptions are, and whether they are associated with men's own circumcision uptake.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We conducted a cross-sectional study of all adult residents of eight villages in Rwampara District, southwestern Uganda in 2020-2022. We elicited their perceptions of the adult male circumcision prevalence within their village: >50% (most men), 10% to <50% (some), <10%, (few to none), or do not know. We compared their perceived norms to the aggregated prevalence of circumcision reported in these villages. We used a modified multivariable Poisson regression model to estimate the association between perceived norms and personal circumcision uptake among men.
Results UNASSIGNED
We surveyed 1566 participants (91% response rate): 698 men and 868 women. Among the men, 167 (27%) reported being circumcised, including 167/444 (38%) men <50 years of age. Approximately one-fourth of the population (189 (27%) men and 177 (20%) women) believed that few to no men in their own village had been circumcised. In a multivariable regression model, men who underestimated the prevalence of male circumcision were less likely to be circumcised themselves (adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.37-0.83).
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
In this population-based study in rural Uganda, one-fourth of men underestimated the prevalence of male circumcision. Men who underestimated the extent of circumcision uptake were themselves less likely to be circumcised. If the observed association is causal and underestimates within the population contribute to low uptake, then interventions correcting these misperceived norms could increase uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38112224
doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04149
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

04149

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure of Interests: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and declare that ACT is a member of the Journal of Global Health editorial board and reports receiving a financial honorarium from Elsevier, Inc. for his work as Co-Editor in Chief of the Elsevier-owned journal SSM-Mental Health.

Auteurs

Jessica M Perkins (JM)

Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Bernard Kakuhikire (B)

Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Charles Baguma (C)

Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Sehee Jeon (S)

Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Sarah F Walker (SF)

Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Rohit Dongre (R)

Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Viola Kyokunda (V)

Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Mercy Juliet (M)

Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Emily N Satinsky (EN)

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Alison B Comfort (AB)

Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Franciso, California, USA.

Mark J Siedner (MJ)

Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Scholastic Ashaba (S)

Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Alexander C Tsai (AC)

Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Classifications MeSH