Comparison of topical permethrin 5% vs. benzyl benzoate 25% treatment in scabies: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 23 07 2023
revised: 21 11 2023
accepted: 08 12 2023
medline: 18 3 2024
pubmed: 19 12 2023
entrez: 19 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Scabies is a pruritic parasitic infestation of the skin. High-income countries have reported an increasing incidence over the last few years. Studies have indicated a reduction in the sensitivity of scabies mites to the standard treatment of choice, topical permethrin 5%. To evaluate in a head-to-head manner the efficacy of two topical scabicides [permethrin 5% and benzyl benzoate 25% (BB)] in the treatment of scabies using the same administration modality; and to address potential confounding factors such as incorrectly performed treatment and hygiene measures. In total, 110 patients with dermoscopy-verified scabies infestation were enrolled and randomized into two equally sized groups in a double-blinded manner. Fifty-five received topical permethrin 5% and 55 received topical BB 25%, both for daily use over a period of three consecutive days. Treatment outcome was evaluated by dermoscopy at a 3-week follow-up visit. Treatment resulted in a dermoscopy-verified cure rate of 27% in the permethrin group and 87% in the BB group. The tolerability and safety profile of permethrin 5% cream was excellent, while the BB emulsion produced a burning sensation in 43% of patients. Topical permethrin demonstrated a lack of efficacy in the majority of scabies cases, whereas BB demonstrated an excellent cure rate and reasonable tolerability. Considering the reduced sensitivity of scabies mites to permethrin 5%, our results suggest that BB is an appropriate first-line therapy in the treatment of scabies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Scabies is a pruritic parasitic infestation of the skin. High-income countries have reported an increasing incidence over the last few years. Studies have indicated a reduction in the sensitivity of scabies mites to the standard treatment of choice, topical permethrin 5%.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To evaluate in a head-to-head manner the efficacy of two topical scabicides [permethrin 5% and benzyl benzoate 25% (BB)] in the treatment of scabies using the same administration modality; and to address potential confounding factors such as incorrectly performed treatment and hygiene measures.
METHODS METHODS
In total, 110 patients with dermoscopy-verified scabies infestation were enrolled and randomized into two equally sized groups in a double-blinded manner. Fifty-five received topical permethrin 5% and 55 received topical BB 25%, both for daily use over a period of three consecutive days. Treatment outcome was evaluated by dermoscopy at a 3-week follow-up visit.
RESULTS RESULTS
Treatment resulted in a dermoscopy-verified cure rate of 27% in the permethrin group and 87% in the BB group. The tolerability and safety profile of permethrin 5% cream was excellent, while the BB emulsion produced a burning sensation in 43% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Topical permethrin demonstrated a lack of efficacy in the majority of scabies cases, whereas BB demonstrated an excellent cure rate and reasonable tolerability. Considering the reduced sensitivity of scabies mites to permethrin 5%, our results suggest that BB is an appropriate first-line therapy in the treatment of scabies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38112640
pii: 7478651
doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad501
doi:

Substances chimiques

Permethrin 509F88P9SZ
benzyl benzoate N863NB338G
Benzoates 0
Acaricides 0
Ivermectin 70288-86-7

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

486-491

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

Auteurs

Damian Meyersburg (D)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Salzburg of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Magdalena Hoellwerth (M)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Salzburg of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Matthias Brandlmaier (M)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Salzburg of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Allesandra Handisurya (A)

Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Andreas Kaiser (A)

Department of Psychosomatics and Inpatient Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Christine Prodinger (C)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Salzburg of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Johann W Bauer (JW)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Salzburg of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH