Genome-wide gene-environment interaction analyses to understand the relationship between red meat and processed meat intake and colorectal cancer risk.
Journal
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology
ISSN: 1538-7755
Titre abrégé: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200608
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Dec 2023
19 Dec 2023
Historique:
accepted:
11
12
2023
received:
21
06
2023
revised:
05
09
2023
medline:
19
12
2023
pubmed:
19
12
2023
entrez:
19
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
High red meat and/or processed meat consumption are established colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors. We conducted a genome-wide gene-environment (GxE) interaction analysis to identify genetic variants that may modify these associations. A pooled sample of 29,842 CRC cases and 39,635 controls of European ancestry from 27 studies were included. Quantiles for red meat and processed meat intake were constructed from harmonized questionnaire data. Genotyping arrays were imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium. Two-step EDGE and joint tests of GxE interaction were utilized in our genome-wide scan. Meta-analyses confirmed positive associations between increased consumption of red meat and processed meat with CRC risk (per quartile red meat OR = 1.30; 95%CI = 1.21-1.41; processed meat OR = 1.40; 95%CI = 1.20-1.63). Two significant genome-wide GxE interactions for red meat consumption were found. Joint GxE tests revealed the rs4871179 SNP in chromosome 8 (downstream of HAS2); greater than median of consumption ORs = 1.38 (95%CI = 1.29-1.46), 1.20 (95%CI = 1.12 -1.27), and 1.07 (95%CI = 0.95 - 1.19) for CC, CG and GG, respectively. The two-step EDGE method identified the rs35352860 SNP in chromosome 18 (SMAD7 intron); greater than median of consumption ORs = 1.18 (95%CI = 1.11-1.24), 1.35 (95%CI = 1.26-1.44), and 1.46 (95%CI = 1.26-1.69) for CC, CT, and TT, respectively. We propose two novel biomarkers that support the role of meat consumption with an increased risk of CRC. The reported GxE interactions may explain the increased risk of CRC in certain population subgroups.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
High red meat and/or processed meat consumption are established colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors. We conducted a genome-wide gene-environment (GxE) interaction analysis to identify genetic variants that may modify these associations.
METHODS
METHODS
A pooled sample of 29,842 CRC cases and 39,635 controls of European ancestry from 27 studies were included. Quantiles for red meat and processed meat intake were constructed from harmonized questionnaire data. Genotyping arrays were imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium. Two-step EDGE and joint tests of GxE interaction were utilized in our genome-wide scan.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Meta-analyses confirmed positive associations between increased consumption of red meat and processed meat with CRC risk (per quartile red meat OR = 1.30; 95%CI = 1.21-1.41; processed meat OR = 1.40; 95%CI = 1.20-1.63). Two significant genome-wide GxE interactions for red meat consumption were found. Joint GxE tests revealed the rs4871179 SNP in chromosome 8 (downstream of HAS2); greater than median of consumption ORs = 1.38 (95%CI = 1.29-1.46), 1.20 (95%CI = 1.12 -1.27), and 1.07 (95%CI = 0.95 - 1.19) for CC, CG and GG, respectively. The two-step EDGE method identified the rs35352860 SNP in chromosome 18 (SMAD7 intron); greater than median of consumption ORs = 1.18 (95%CI = 1.11-1.24), 1.35 (95%CI = 1.26-1.44), and 1.46 (95%CI = 1.26-1.69) for CC, CT, and TT, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We propose two novel biomarkers that support the role of meat consumption with an increased risk of CRC.
IMPACT
CONCLUSIONS
The reported GxE interactions may explain the increased risk of CRC in certain population subgroups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38112776
pii: 731778
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0717
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM